Analisis Tindak Tutur Menyatakan Pendapat dalam Drama Seri “1 Rittoru No Namida”

Asteria Permata Martawijaya

Abstract


Expressing opinion is a speech act that can be considered unpolite if delivered in a direct speech. Therefore, when expressing their opinions Japanese people often use various speech act constructions so that their opinions are not too straight to the point. This is done in order to respect and maintain the interlocutor’s feeling. In this study, the author examines speech acts expressing opinions in everyday conversation by looking at the construction used and its meaning. This research is limited to speech acts expressing opinions or facts in conversations on 1 Rittoru no Namida drama series. The method that used in this reseach is descriptive method. From the results of the study it was found that when expressing opinions or facts, speakers in the drama series 1 Rittoru no Namida used various constructions. The most widely used construction is guess construction. In addition, the construction of approval requests construction, avoidance construction, considerations construction, and elliptical construction are also used on the conversations.

 


Keywords


speech acts; expressing opinions; 1 Rittoru no Namida

Full Text:

PDF

References


Austin, J.L. 1962. How To Do Things With Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aziz, Aminudin E. 2000. “Aspek-aspek Budaya yang Terlupakan dalam Praktek Pengajaran Bahasa Asing”. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Blum–Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requestand Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Albex Publishing Corporation.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. 1978. Universals of Language Usages: Politeness Phenomena; in: Esther Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56-311.

Chaer, Abdul & Agustina, Leonie. 1995. Sosiolingusitik Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Edizal. 2001. Tutur Kata Manusia Jepang. Padang: Kayu Pasak.

Kartomihardjo, S. 1993. “Analisis Wacana dengan Penerapannya pada Beberapa Wacana” dalam Bambang Kaswanti Purwo (Ed.). PELIBA 6. Jakarta: Lembaga Bahasa Unika Atma Jaya.

Nadar, F. X. (2009). Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Rahardi, Kunjana. 2001. Alih Kode dan Campur Kode. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Rahardi, Kunjana. 2002. Sosiopragmatik. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Rahardi, Kunjana. 2007. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : Erlangga.

Tarigan, Guntur. 1990. Pengajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.

Wijana, Putu. 1996. Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi offset.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jjlel.3124

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Japanese Language Education and Linguistics

 

 

Editorial Office

Journal of Japanese Language Education and Linguistics

KH Ibrahim Building (E6) First Floor, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Jalan Brawijaya, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Yogyakarta, 55183

email: jjlel.pbj@umy.ac.id

Phone: +62 274 387656, ext. 459

Department of Japanese Language Education, Faculty of Language Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta




                                                                                                                        Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.