ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN BEBAS TERDAKWA ANGGOTA POLRI DALAM PERKARA TERTEMBAKNYA WARGA SIPIL DI MESUJI LAMPUNG

I Ketut Seregig

Abstract


The Free Verdict handed down by the Appellate Court of the Tanjungkarang High Court is a judgment that has fulfilled the sense of justice for the defendant AKP WH as a member of the Police, because the Panel of Judges has shown the authority of this law in the eyes of the public in general and gives appreciation to the Indonesian Police measures in securing the show  anarchist feelings that people do. However, the justification justifying the decision of the Tanjungkarang High Court of  Appeals Court is the issue that needs to be investigated to determine what is considered by the Panel of Justices so that in its decision to free the Defendant AKP WH from all charges.The conclusion of the research that has been done is that the free judgment handed down by the Appeals Judge to the defendant is based on several considerations that are used as justification reasons, among others; the defendant has performed his duties in accordance with the procedures laid down in the applicable law and the use of firearms to disperse anarchist masses and no longer any party to the act of the defendant, material or moral, as all parties have agreed to make peace. Reviewing the facts presented in the appeals court by the Appeals Panel is used as the Rejection and Forgiveness Reason because there is no longer any legal provisions violated by the defendant AKP WH, the Panel of Judges frees the defendant from all charges

Keywords


State Duty; Anarchist; Free Verdict

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdussalam, 2009. Hukum kepolisian sebagai hukum positif dalam disiplin hokum – Restu Agung, Jakarta.

Atmasasmita, Romli, 2001. Reformasi Hukum, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Penegakan Hukum Cetakan Pertama – Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Djamin, Awaloedin, 2007. Kedudukan Polri Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan – PTIK Press, Jakarta.

F.Susanto, Anton, 2010. Teori-teori hukum Hukum – Refika Aditama Bandung.

Lamintang, P.A.F, 1997. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia – Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Nawawi Arief, Barda, 2002. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana – Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Purnomo, Bambang, 1996. Teori pertanggung jawaban Pidana – Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. Rifai, Ahmad, 2011. Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim – Sinar grafika Jakarta.

Saleh, Roeslan, 1999. Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana-Aksara Baru Jakarta. Sitompul, DPM, 2004.

Beberapa Tugas dan Wewenang Polri – Divisi Pembinaan Hukum Polri, Jakarta.

Sianturi, S.R, 1996. Asas-asas Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya–Alumni Ahaem-Patahaem Jakarta.

Soesilo, R., 1999. KUHP serta komentar-komentar nya lengkap dengan pasal demi pasal – Politeia Bogor.

Soekanto, Soerjono, 1991. Kriminologi Suatu Pengantar, penerbit Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Sudarto, Hukum Pidana, 1997 – Yayasan Sudarto Fakultas Hukum UNDIP, Semarang.

Sugiono, 2005. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif – Alfabeta, Bandung.

Sumpeno, Wahyudin, 2009. Polri sebagai fasilitator mendampingi masyarakat, edisi ke-1 – Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Perkapolri Nomor: 1/2009, tentang Penggunaan Kekuatan dalam Tindakan Kepolisian.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2018.0101.48-59

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 I Ketut seregig



             

  

JMH Visitor