Predisposisi Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perencanaan Kampung Wisata (Studi Kasus Kampung Wisata Santan)

Sutrisno Sutrisno


This study aimed to analyze predisposition (readiness), especially understanding and attitudes towards the tourist village program and to analyze community participation in the declaration and plan of participation in the program tourist village. The experiment was conducted in the village (Kampung) Santan Village Guwosari, Pajangan Bantul. Respondents are determined by the census. The results showed general cognitive understanding people's understanding of the tourist village, the knowledge of the planning and launching of Kampung Dusun Santan as Tourism is still largely lacking (only know a little bit). This is due to the constraints of socialization and domination of the village leaders in planning the tourist village less evenly involve villagers. Once people get the socialization though still very limited, affective response was very positive and support the tourist village. They hoped that Kampung Santan be more advanced and increased economy. Public participation in the tourist village program showed improved symptoms, ranging from participation since the planning, at the time of the declaration and the time after the launching. Forms of participation can be seen from the amount of involvement of communities themselves and plan the most desirable programs. Tourism Village program were most interested in the community is the provision of infrastructure, because the program is expected to bring direct benefits to the community. It is recommended that the socialization and solidarity of citizens needs to be improved so that participation can be improved.


predisposition; response; participation; tourist village

Full Text:



Awang, S.A.; H. Santoso; W.T. Widayati; Y. Nugroho; Kustomo; Sapardiono. 2001. Gurat hutan rakyat di kapur selatan. Yogyakarta: Debut Press.

Blackstock, K. 2005. A critical look at community base tourism. Community Development Journal 40(1): 39 – 49.

Echtner, C. M. 2002. The content of the third world tourism marketing: a 4A Approach. International Journal of Tourism Research 4: 413-434.

Damanik, J. & H. F. Weber. 2006. Perencanaan Kampung Wisata: Dari Teori ke Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Pariwisata dan Penerbit Andi.

Gartner, W. C. 2004. Rural tourism development in the USA. International Journal of Tourism Research 6: 151 – 164.

Lansing, P., and P. De Vries. 2007. Sustainable tourism: ethical alternative or marketing ploy?. Journal of Business Ethics 72:77-85.

Nugroho, I. (2011). Ekowisata dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Pike, S. 2005. Tourism destination branding complexity. The Journal of Product and Brand Management 14(4): 258 – 259.

Pinel, D. P. 1998. Create A Good Fit: A Community-Based Tourism Planning Model. Pinel & Association Research & Planning, Canada.

Santosa, S. P. 2002. Pengembangan Pariwisata Indonesia. Diunduh pada tanggal 20 Mei 2009.

Simon, H. 1999. Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Rakyat (Cooperative Forest Management). Teori dan Aplikasi pada Hutan Jati di Jawa. Yogyakarta: Bigraf Publishing.

Welford, R. dan B. Ytterhus. 2004. Suistainable development and tourism destination management: A case study of the Lillahammer region, Norwey. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 11:410 – 422.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 45 times
PDF - 90 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal AGRARIS

Editorial Office

AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research

Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Gedung Siti Walidah, F3 Lt 1

Jln. Brawijaya Tamantirto Kasihan Bantul 55183 Indonesia

Ph. +62 274 387656  Fax. +62 274 387646


p-ISSN: 2407-814X , e-ISSN: 2527-9238 

Creative Commons License
AGRARIS is licensed under an International License