Minat Konsumen Terhadap Beras Organik di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dan Jawa Tengah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/agr.2234Keywords:
consumer concerns, consumer interest, consumer perception, organic riceAbstract
Various cases of food poisoning has caused people to more selective in choosing food by taking into account the health and food safety. Consumer awareness and preferences towards healthy food has resulted an increasing on consumption of organic food. This study aims to explain the consumer perceptions of organic rice, and its effect on consumer buying interest. The study was conducted by analized and interviewed 120 respondents. The binomial logit regression analysis was applied to explain the influence of consumer's perception on agricultural products. This research shows the consumers of organic rice come from various groups of people, most of them are from fixed-income consumer, high level of education, and small size family. Consumers of organic rice has a high concern on their family, has a perception on high level of purity, and has high concern on the health of agricultural environment. However, consumers perception on organic farming practices was in moderate category. Organic agricultural products are still perceived as a high price product. Consumer interest on consuming organic rice would increase due to an increasing on consumer concerns on the family, perception of purity, concern on agriculture environmental health, and perception of the practice of organic farming.References
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2015. SNI 6729-2010 Sistem Pangan Organik (Online). Diakses 9 Februari 2015. www.bsn.go.id
Biao, X., Xiaorong, W., Zhuhong, D., & Yaping, Y. 2003. Critical impact assessment of organic agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16: 297-311.
Canavari, M., Gazzani, G. M., Spadoni, R, & Regazzi, D. 2002. Food safety and organic fruit demand in Italy: a survey. British Food Journal 104 (3-5): 220-232.
Connor, R., & Douglas, L. 2002. Consumer attitudes to organic foods. Nutrition and Food Science 31 (4/5): 254-258.
Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. 1993. Perilaku Konsumen: Edisi 6. Binarupa Aksara, Jakarta.
Fotopoulos, Christos, & Krystallis, A. 2002. Purchasing motives and profile the Greek organic consumer: a countrywide survey. British Food Journal 104 (8/9): 730-765.
Gianluigi, G., Prete, M. I., Peluso, A. M., R. Maloumby-Baka, C., & Buffa, C. 2009. The role of ethics and product personality in intention to purchase organic food products: a structural equation modeling approach. Int Rev Econ.
IFOAM, 2009. The 2009 Annual Report (Online). Diakses 17 Februari 2010. www.ifoam.org.
Malhotra, N. M. 2004. Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, Fourth Edition. Prentice Hall, Saddle River, NJ.
Peter, & Olson. 1996. Consumer Behavior. McGraw Hill co.
Ricciuto, L., Tarasuk, V., & Yatchew, A. 2006. Socio-demographic influence on food purchasing among Canadian koueholds. European Journal of Clinical Science 60: 778-790.
Rimal, A. P. 2002. Factors affecting meat preferences among American consumers. Family Economics and Nutrition Review 14 (2): 36-43.
Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. 1997. Consumer Behavior: 6th Edition. Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Shepherd, Richard, Magnusson, M., & Sjoden, P. 2005. Determinant of consumer behaviour related to organic foods. Ambio 34 (4/5): 352-359.
Sangkumchaliang, Parichard, & Huang, W. C. 2012. Consumers’ perceptions and attitudes of organic food products in Northern Thailand. International Foods and Agribusiness Management Review 15: 87-102.
Unnevehr, L. J., Duff, B., & Juliano, B. O.1992. Consumer demand for rice grain quality: introduction and major finding. Dalam Consumer Demand for Rice Grain Quality. IRRI, Manila.
Zander, Katrin, & Hamm, U. 2010. Consumer preference for additional ethical attributes of organic food. Food Quality and Preference 21: 495 – 503.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal is based on the work at https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ag/index under license from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free to:
- Share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even comercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms, which include the following:
- Attribution. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Information for authors
The author should be aware that by submitting an article to this journal, the article's copyright will be fully transferred to AGRARIS. Authors are allowed to resend their manuscript to other journals or intentionally withdraw the manuscript only if both parties (AGRARIS and Authors) have agreed on the issue. Once the manuscript has been published, authors are allowed to use their published article under AGRARIS copyrights.
All authors are required to deliver the agreement of license transfer once they submit the manuscript to AGRARIS. By signing the agreement, the copyright is attributed to this journal to protect the intellectual material for the authors. Authors are allowed to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium and in any circumstances.
• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
AGRARIS is licensed under an International License
