Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure on Politically Connected-Family Firms
Abstract
Research aims: This study examines the relationship between political connections and family ownership toward CSR activities disclosure.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employed 624 Indonesian public companies on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) list for 2010-2018. The researchers used OLS (Ordinary Least Squares) regression by considering the fixed effect diversity of industry, year, and type of GRI to examine the relationship between political connections and family ownership on CSR disclosure.
Research Findings: This study discovered that companies with political connections disclosed more CSR activities because they desired to bind themselves with the government, instruments of legacy, and social motivation. However, family firms were not found to have a significant relationship with CSR disclosure. In addition, the strong family ownership in the firm impacted the reduced strength of political connections, thereby reducing the company's CSR activities disclosure.
Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study is interesting because the researchers combined the issue of the politically connected board and family firms, which are frequently found in the context of Indonesian companies. The researchers expect this study to enhance corporate board characteristics and CSR disclosure literature. Practically, the researchers expect this study could provide useful information for investors to make investment decisions. Furthermore, this study provides insight for regulators, who need a view of how political connections and family companies exist in responding to the regulations they set. Therefore, the existing regulations can be improved. Yet, this study was limited to the proxy of political connection based on local regulation of politically exposed person (PEP).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abeysekera, A. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility versus corporate shareholder responsibility: A family firm perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance, 61, 101370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.05.003
Al-Hadi, A., Al-Yahyaee, K. H., Hussain, S. M., & Taylor, G. (2017). Market risk disclosures, corporate governance structure and political connections: evidence from GCC firms. Applied Economics Letters, 25(19), 1346–1350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1420877
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82–113. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.82
Bianchi, M. T., Monteiro, P., Azevedo, G., Oliveira, J., Viana, R. C., & Branco, M. C. (2019). Political connections and corporate social responsibility reporting in Portugal. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(4), 1203–1215. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-10-2018-0111
Biswas, P. K., Roberts, H., & Whiting, R. H. (2019). The impact of family vs. non-family governance contingencies on CSR reporting in Bangladesh. Management Decision, 57(10), 2758–2781. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-11-2017-1072
Block, J. H., & Wagner, M. (2014). The Effect of Family Ownership on Different Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Large US Firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(7), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1798
Boubakri, N., Cosset, J.-C., & Saffar, W. (2012). The Impact of Political Connections on Firms’ Operating Performance and Financing Decisions. Journal of Financial Research, 35(3), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2012.01322.x
Campopiano, G., & De Massis, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: A Content Analysis in Family and Non-family Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2174-z
Chang, L., Li, W., & Lu, X. (2015). Government Engagement, Environmental Policy, and Environmental Performance: Evidence from the Most Polluting Chinese Listed Firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1802
Chau, G., & Leung, P. (2006). The impact of board composition and family ownership on audit committee formation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006.01.001
Chen, S., Chen, X. & Cheng, Q. (2008). Do Family Firms Provide More or Less Voluntary Disclosure? Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 499–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2008.00288.x
Chen, Y.-C., Hung, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.009
Cheng, Q. (2014). Family firm research - A review. China Journal of Accounting Research, 7(3), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2014.03.002
Claessens, S., & Djankov, S. (2000). East Asian corporations. World Bank Discussion Papers. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4631-8
Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & García-Sánchez, I.-M. (2015). The role of independent directors at family firms in relation to corporate social responsibility disclosures. International Business Review, 24(5), 890–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.04.002
Cui, V., Ding, S., Liu, M., Wu, Z., & Cui, V. (2018). Revisiting the Effect of Family Involvement on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Behavioral Agency Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3309-1
De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. (2014). Ability and Willingness as Sufficiency Conditions for Family-Oriented Particularistic Behavior: Implications for Theory and Empirical Studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12102
Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852
Deegan, C. (2007). Organizational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting. Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, 127–149. https://doi.org/10.4324/noe0415384889.ch7
Dewenter, K. L., & Malatesta, P. H. (2001). State-Owned and Privately Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labor Intensity. American Economic Review, 91(1), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.320
Dicko, S., Khemakhem, H., & Zogning, F. (2020). Political connections and voluntary disclosure: the case of Canadian listed companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 24(2), 481-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09471-3
Ding, S., Jia, C., Wu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2014). Executive political connections and firm performance: Comparative evidence from privately-controlled and state-owned enterprises. International Review of Financial Analysis, 36, 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2013.12.006
Dyer, W. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Family Firms and Social Responsibility: Preliminary Evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 785–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00151.x
Faccio, M. (2006). Politically Connected Firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704
Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between Politically Connected and Nonconnected Firms: A Cross-Country Analysis. Financial Management, 39(3), 905–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053x.2010.01099.x
Fu, J., Shimamoto, D., & Todo, Y. (2017). Can firms with political connections borrow more than those without? Evidence from firm-level data for Indonesia. Journal of Asian Economics, 52, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.08.003
Global Reporting Initiative. (2019). GRI’s Contribution to Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/public-policy-partnerships/sustainable-development/
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Gusrianti, G., Nirmala, M. P., Kamela, H., Djakman, C. D., & Adhariani, D. (2020). Corporate social responsibility disclosure to firm value with family ownership as the moderating variable. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(11), 674-688. Retrieved from https://scholar.ui.ac.id/en/publications/corporate-social-responsibility-disclosure-to-firm-value-with-fam
Haque, F., & Jones, M. J. (2020). European firms’ corporate biodiversity disclosures and board gender diversity from 2002 to 2016. The British Accounting Review, 52(2), 100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100893
Harymawan, I., & Nowland, J. (2016). Political connections and earnings quality. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 24(4), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-05-2016-0056
Harymawan, I., Agustia, D., & Agung, A. K. (2017). Characteristics of politically connected firms in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(4), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(4).2017.02
Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., Madyan, M., & Sucahyati, D. (2019). The Role of Political Connections on Family Firms’ Performance: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Financial Studies, 7(4), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs7040055
Hung, C.-H. D., Jiang, Y., Liu, F. H., Tu, H., & Wang, S. (2017). Bank political connections and performance in China. Journal of Financial Stability, 32, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.09.003
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2019). The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, 451–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198802280.013.20
Jackowicz, K., Kozłowski, Ł., & Mielcarz, P. (2014). Political connections and operational performance of non-financial firms: New evidence from Poland. Emerging Markets Review, 20, 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2014.06.005
Kent, P., & Zunker, T. (2013). Attaining legitimacy by employee information in annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1072–1106. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-03-2013-1261
Kim, J., Fairclough, S., & Dibrell, C. (2017). Attention, Action, and Greenwash in Family-Influenced Firms? Evidence From Polluting Industries. Organization & Environment, 30(4), 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616673410
Kong, D., Cheng, X., & Jiang, X. (2021). Effects of political promotion on local firms’ social responsibility in China. Economic Modelling, 95, 418-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.03.009
KPMG. (2017). The Road Ahead. The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting. Retrieved from https://www.integratedreporting.org/resource/kpmg-the-road-ahead-the-kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017/
Kuo, L., Yeh, C.-C., & Yu, H.-C. (2011). Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management: Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(5), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.274
Kuttner, M., Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B., & Mitter, C. (2020). Corporate social responsibility in Austrian family firms: socioemotional wealth and stewardship insights from a qualitative approach. Journal of Family Business Management, 11(2), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfbm-04-2019-0028
Lamb, N. H., & Butler, F. C. (2016). The Influence of Family Firms and Institutional Owners on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance. Business & Society, 57(7), 1374–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316648443
Li, D., Lin, H., & Yang, Y. (2016). Does the stakeholders – corporate social responsibility (CSR) relationship exist in emerging countries? Evidence from China. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-01-2015-0018
Li, Y., Miao, X., Zheng, D., & Tang, Y. (2019). Corporate Public Transparency on Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Political Embeddedness. Sustainability, 11(19), 5531. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195531
Lin, K. J., Tan, J., Zhao, L., & Karim, K. (2015). In the name of charity: Political connections and strategic corporate social responsibility in a transition economy. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 327-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.007
Lind, D., Wathen, S., & Marchal, W. (2007). Teknik-teknik statistika dalam bisnis dan ekonomi menggunakan kelompok data global. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Ling, L., Zhou, X., Liang, Q., Song, P., & Zeng, H. (2016). Political connections, overinvestments, and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese listed real estate firms. Finance Research Letters, 18, 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.05.009
Liu, X., & Zhang, C. (2017). Corporate governance, social responsibility information disclosure, and enterprise value in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1075–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.102
López-González, E., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Meca, E. (2019). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A contingency approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1044–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.251
Lueg, K., Krastev, B., & Lueg, R. (2019). Bidirectional effects between organizational sustainability disclosure and risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.379
Madden, L., McMillan, A., & Harris, O. (2020). Drivers of selectivity in family firms: Understanding the impact of age and ownership on CSR. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 11(2), 100335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.100335
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4011987
Mok, H. M. K., Lam, K. & Cheung, I. (1992). Family control and return covariation in Hong Kong’s common stocks. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 19(2), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1992.tb00625.x
Montecchia, A., Giordano, F., & Grieco, C. (2016). Communicating CSR: integrated approach or Selfie? Evidence from the Milan Stock Exchange. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.099
Nekhili, M., Nagati, H., Chtioui, T., & Rebolledo, C. (2017). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market value: Family versus nonfamily firms. Journal of Business Research, 77, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.001
Nordqvist, M., Kumeto, G., Melin, L., & Waldkirch, M. (2015). Theoretical Perspectives on Family Businesses. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479665
O’Boyle, E. H., Rutherford, M. W., & Pollack, J. M. (2010). Examining the Relation Between Ethical Focus and Financial Performance in Family Firms: An Exploratory Study. Family Business Review, 23(4), 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486510375412
Papoutsi, A., & Sodhi, M. S. (2020). Does disclosure in sustainability reports indicate actual sustainability performance? Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121049
Pascual-Fuster, B., & Crespí-Cladera, R. (2018). Politicians in the boardroom: Is it a convenient burden? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(6), 448–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12261
Sekhon, A. K., & Kathuria, L. M. (2019). Analyzing the impact of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance: evidence from top Indian firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-04-2019-0135
Talbot, D., & Barbat, G. (2019). Water disclosure in the mining sector: An assessment of the credibility of sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1241–1251. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1880
Tessema, A. (2019). The impact of corporate governance and political connections on information asymmetry: International evidence from banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council member countries. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 35, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2019.05.001
Ting, P.-H. (2021). Do large firms just talk corporate social responsibility? - The evidence from CSR report disclosure. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101476
Van der Laan Smith, J., Adhikari, A., & Tondkar, R. H. (2005). Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(2), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.12.007
Velte, P., Stawinoga, M., & Lueg, R. (2020). Carbon performance and disclosure: A systematic review of governance-related determinants and financial consequences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120063
Wang, D., Ma, G., Song, X., & Liu, Y. (2016). Political connection and business transformation in family firms: Evidence from China. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.05.001
Wati, L. N., Ramdany, R., & Momon, M. (2020). Does corporate governance affect financial reporting quality of politically connected firms? Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 2126–2143. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(45)
Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1998). A Behavioral Agency Model of Managerial Risk Taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.192967
Wu, W., Wu, C., Zhou, C., & Wu, J. (2012). Political connections, tax benefits and firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(3), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.005
Xu, N., Yuan, Q., Jiang, X., & Chan, K. C. (2015). Founder’s political connections, second generation involvement, and family firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance. 33, 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.004
Zaid, M. A. A., Abuhijleh, S. T. F., & Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C. (2020). Ownership structure, stakeholder engagement, and corporate social responsibility policies: The moderating effect of board independence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1888
Zellweger, T., Sieger, P., & Halter, F. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.04.001
Zhang, M., Di Fan, D., & Zhu, C. J. (2014). High-Performance Work Systems, Corporate Social Performance and Employee Outcomes: Exploring the Missing Links. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(3), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1672-8
Zhou, H., He, F., & Wang, Y. (2017). Did family firms perform better during the financial crisis? New insights from the S&P 500 firms. Global Finance Journal, 33, 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.01.001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v23i2.14865
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Office:
Ruang Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMY
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id
Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
View My Stats