Does the cost behavior remain sticky? a 20-year literature review of cost stickiness
Abstract
Research aims: This study aims to describe the development of cost stickiness research over the past twenty years globally and presents a future research agenda.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The method used in this study is a systematic literature review with a final research sample of 91 articles from 42 international journals indexed by Scopus Q1-Q4 and 20 articles from national journals indexed by SINTA 1-4.
Research findings: This research found annual developments and fluctuations in cost stickiness research topics in international and national journals. Mapping of cost stickiness research exhibits that (1) the dominating antecedent variable is revenue change, (2) the popular consequence variable is accounting conservatism, (3) the most widely used theory is cost stickiness theory, (4) the majority of cost stickiness research used quantitative methods with secondary data, (5) the widely used population is public sector or profit-oriented companies, and (6) the proxy dominating cost stickiness research is SG&A.
Theoretical contribution/Originality: This research mapping is based on six critical aspects of cost stickiness and provides several suggestions for future research. It is expected that future research related to cost stickiness can use this research as a reference and inspiration.
Research limitation/Implication: Several websites in national journals indexed by SINTA 1-4 could not be accessed due to errors, limiting the number of research samples in national journals. Hence, future research can expand the search for articles in SINTA 1-6 or through other pages/portals (such as Web of Science) to more comprehensively describe the development of cost stickiness research.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are Selling, General, and Administrative Cost “Sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(972), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095
Azmi, Z., & Januryanti, J. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Sticky Cost. J-MAS (Jurnal Manajemen dan Sains), 6(1), 274-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jmas.v6i1.219
Banker, R. D., Basu, S., Byzalov, D., & Chen, J. Y. S. (2016). The Confounding Effect of Cost Stickiness on Conservatism Estimates. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.07.001
Banker, R. D., & Byzalov, D. (2014). Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43-79. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50846
Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., Fang, S., & Liang, Y. (2017). Cost Management Research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51965
Bugeja, M., Lu, M., & Shan, Y. (2015). Cost Stickiness in Australia: Characteristics and Determinants. Australian Accounting Review, 25(3), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12066
Chen, J. V., Kama, I., & Lehavy, R. (2019). A Contextual Analysis of the Impact of Managerial Expectations on Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Review of Accounting Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-019-09491-2
Cheung, J., Kim, H., Kim, S., & Huang, R. (2016). Is the Asymmetric Cost Behavior Affected by Competition Factors? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 25 (1-2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2016.1266271
Dewi, A. C., Fitriana, A., & Setiawan, D. (2018). Perkembangan Penelitian di Bidang Pengungkapan di Indonesia: Telaah Konseptual. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 22(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol22.iss1.art1
Ditta, A. S. A., & Setiawan, D. (2019). Corporate Governance in Indonesia: One Decade Perspective. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 23(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v23i1.2182
Evelyn, E. (2018). Pengaruh Perubahan Penjualan, Asset Intensity, Profitability, Size, dan Leverage terhadap Cost Stickiness. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(2), 411-418.
Fourati, Y. M., Ghorbel, R. C., & Jarboui, A. (2020). Sticky Cost Behavior and Its Implication on Accounting Conservatism: A Cross-Country Study. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(1), 169-197. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-08-2018-0071
Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2018). Managerial Accounting Sixteenth Edition. McGraw-Hill Education: New York.
Golden, J., Mashruwala, R., & Pevzner, M. (2020). Labor Adjustment Costs and Asymmetric Cost Behavior: An Extension. Management Accounting Research, 46(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2019.07.004
Gray, D. L. (2020). Are Operating Lease Costs Sticky Cost for Retail Firms? Advances in Management Accounting, 32, 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-787120200000032003
Guenther, T. W., Riehl, A., & Rößler, R. (2014). Cost Stickiness: State of the Art of Research and Implications. Journal of Management Control, 24(4), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-013-0176-0
Herawati, N., & Bandi, B. (2017). Dua Puluh Tahun Riset Perpajakan dalam Akuntansi: Suatu Studi Bibliografi. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 19(2), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.19.2.102-121
Herawati, N., & Bandi, B. (2019). Makro Ekonomi dan Return Saham: Suatu Telaah Pustaka di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 19(1), 119-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jab.v19i1.288
Herawati, N., Rahmawati, R., Bandi, B., & Setiawan, D. (2019). Penelitian penghindaran pajak di Indonesia. InFestasi, 15(2), 108-135. https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v15i2.6006
Ibrahim, A. E. A. (2018). Board Characteristics and Asymmetric Cost Behavior: Evidence from Egypt. Accounting Research Journal, 31(2), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-11-2015-0148
Ibrahim, A. E. A., Ali, H., & Aboelkheir, H. (2022). Cost Stickiness: A Systematic Literature Review of 27 Years of Research and A Future Research Agenda. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 46, 100439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100439
Ibrahim, A. E. A., & Ezat, A. N. (2017). Sticky Cost Behavior: Evidence from Egypt. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-06-2014-0027
Irawan, D. (2021). Intellectual Capital on Cost Stickiness: A Modified Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (MVAIC) Approach. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 11(2), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v11i2.17432
Krisnadewi, K. A., & Soewarno, N. (2020). Competitiveness and Cost Behaviour: Evidence from the Retail Industry. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-08-2018-0120
Krisnadewi, K. A., & Soewarno, N. (2021). Optimism and Profit-Based Incentives in Cost Stickiness: An Experimental Study. Journal of Management Control, 32(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00309-w
Li, Z., Ying, Q., Chen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Managerial Risk Appetite and Asymmetry Cost Behavior: Evidence from China. Accounting and Finance, 60(5), 4651–4692. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12692
Linggardjaja, I. K. (2020). Factors Affecting Cost Stickiness: A Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, Dan Akuntansi), 4(1), 52–65. https://www.journal.stiemb.ac.id/index.php/mea/article/view/205
Lusiana, L., & Kristianti, I. (2020). Sticky Cost Behavior in Selling, General, and Administrative Costs in Indonesian Manufacturing Companies. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 24(2), 214-224.
Muslim, A. I., & Setiawan, D. (2020). A Literature Review of Tax Avoidance. Assets: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pendidikan, 9(2), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.25273/jap.v9i2.6112
Permatasari, I., & Tjahjadi, B. (2024). A closer look at integrated reporting quality: a systematic review and agenda of future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(3), 661-692. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-08-2022-1782
Ratnawati, L., & Nugrahanti, Y. W. (2015). Perilaku Sticky Cost Biaya Penjualan, Biaya Administrasi dan Umum Serta Harga Pokok Penjualan pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 18(2), 65–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v18i2.314
Salehi, M., Ziba, N., & Daemi Gah, A. (2018). The Relationship Between Cost Stickiness and Financial Reporting Quality in Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 1550–1565. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2017-0255
Setiawati, L. P. E., Rasmini, N. K., & Mimba, N. P. S. H. (2017). Perilaku Cost Stickiness Dalam Kompensasi Eksekutif Bank BUMN dan Non BUMN yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 6(5), 2337-3067.
Sugiri, S., Febrianto, R., & Kresnawati, E. (2016). Sticky Cost Behavior of Bank’s Executive Compensation in Four South East Asian Countries. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 19(3), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v19i3.771
Weil, R., & Maher, M. (2005). Handbook of Cost Management. John Wiley & Sons.
Windyastuti. (2013). Pengujian Variabel Ketenagakerjaan terhadap Biaya Stickiness. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 17(3), 426–433. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v17i3.761
Xue, S., & Hong, Y. (2015). Earnings Management, Corporate Governance and Expense Stickiness. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2015.02.001
Yang, Y. (2018). Do Accruals Earnings Management Constraints and Intellectual Capital Efficiency Trigger Asymmetric Cost Behaviour? Evidence from Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 29(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12250
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v25i2.20919
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Office:
Ruang Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMY
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id
Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
View My Stats