Eleven sectors’ reaction to the political event 2023: evidence from Indonesia Stock Exchange

Ainun Rochimah, Indah Yuliana

Abstract


Research aims: This study analyzes the differences in market reaction towards eleven sectors in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the political event, i.e., the announcement of the Indonesian presidential and vice-presidential nominees in 2023.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This study applied the event study method with indicators of abnormal return, trading volume activity, security return variability, and bid-ask spread. The hypothesis test was a non-parametric test by Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test with a window period of seven days of observation (-3, 0, +3).
Research findings: The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test results revealed a mixed reaction by eleven sectors in IDX to this political event, in which there was a difference and no difference in the reactions.
Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study contributes to providing insight into the reaction of eleven different sectors in the IDX to the different announcements of the Indonesian presidential and vice-presidential nominees in 2023. Previous research usually focused on stock indices or only testing one particular sector. Hence, this study investigated eleven sectors in the capital market to compare the different reactions and to expand the results.
Practitioner/Policy implication: Research on capital market reactions to political events provides important information for investors to make investment decisions based on investor sentiment that assesses the electability of prospective heads of state to advance the Indonesian economy.
Research limitation/Implication: The scope of this study is the announcement of the Indonesian presidential and vice-presidential nominees in 2023; future researchers can continue research on capital market reactions to the Indonesian presidential election 2024 events and add relevant variables, such as foreign sales and foreign buys.


Keywords


Eleven Sectors; Event Study; Market Reaction; Political Event

Full Text:

PDF

References


Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P. (1988). A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability. The Review of Financial Studies, 1(1), 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/1.1.3

Affleck-Graves, J., Callahan, C. M., & Ramanan, R. (2000). Detecting Abnormal Bid-Ask Spread: A Comparison of Event Study Methods. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 14, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008328107489

Ahmed, S., Hasan, M. M., & Kamal, M. R. (2023). Russia–Ukraine crisis: The effects on the European stock market. European Financial Management, 29(4), 1078–1118. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12386

Ahmed, W. M. A. (2017). The impact of political regime changes on stock prices: The case of Egypt. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 12(3), 508–531. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-12-2015-0258

Audi, M., Sulehri, F. A., Ali, A., & Al-Masri, R. (2022). An Event Based Analysis of Stock Return and Political Uncertainty in Pakistan: Revisited. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 12(5), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.13239

Bandiyono, A., & Amalia, P. (2021). The Effect of State Budget Ratification and Expenditure on The Indonesian Capital Market: An Empirical Study on The LQ 45 Index Shares. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 25(2), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v25i2.5134

Binder, J. J. (1998). The Event Study Methodology Since 1969. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 11, 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008295500105

CNBCIndonesia. (2023a, Oktober). Beda dengan Jokowi, Pasar Sambut Dingin Capres-Cawapres 2024. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20231023112422-128-482811/beda-dengan-jokowi-pasar-sambut-dingin-capres-cawapres-2024

CNBCIndonesia. (2023b, September 4). Intrik Di Balik Duet Anies-Cak Imin & Kecewanya Demokrat!. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20230904093205-8-468786/intrik-di-balik-duet-anies-cak-imin-kecewanya-demokrat

CNBCIndonesia. (2024, January 30). Lengkap! Profil Anies-Cak Imin-Prabowo-Gibran-Ganjar-Mahfud. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20240128172721-128-509658/lengkap-profil-anies-cak-imin-prabowo-gibran-ganjar-mahfud

CNNIndonesia. (2023, November 22). Apa Faktor Penyebab Elektabilitas Ganjar-Mahfud Merosot?. CNNIndonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20231122102936-617-1027425/apa-faktor-penyebab-elektabilitas-ganjar-mahfud-merosot

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419

Eldomiaty, T. I., Anwar, M., Magdy, N., & Hakam, M. N. (2020). Robust examination of political structural breaks and abnormal stock returns in Egypt. Future Business Journal, 6(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-020-00014-z

Fama, E. F. (1998). Market Efficiency, Long-Terms Return, and Behavioral Finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00026-9

Foster, F. D., & Viswanathan, S. (1993). Variations in Trading Volume, Return Volatility, and Trading Costs: Evidence on Recent Price Information Models. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04706.x

Hanafi, M. (1997). Informasi Laporan Keuangan: Studi Kasus Pada Emiten BEJ. KELOLA Gadjah Mada University Business Review, VI(16), 74–87.

Hatmanti, A., & Sudibyo, B. (2017). Pengaruh pelantikan kabinet kerja hasil reshuffle jilid ii terhadap harga saham LQ-45. Jurnal Economia, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v13i1.11797

IDX. (2023). Ringkasan Saham. Indonesian Stock Exchange. https://www.idx.co.id/id/data-pasar/ringkasan-perdagangan/ringkasan-saham/

Jogiyanto. (2019). Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi (11th ed.). BPFE-Yogyakarta.

Kamal, M. R., Ahmed, S., & Hasan, M. M. (2023). The impact of the Russia-Ukraine crisis on the stock market: Evidence from Australia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 102036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102036

Kemuning, N. L. D., Prianthara, I. B. T., & Wistawan, I. M. A. P. (2021). Reaksi Pasar terhadap Peristiwa Politik 2019 di Indonesia. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(7), 1746. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2021.v31.i07.p11

Kirana, N., & Sembel, R. (2019). The effect of political event on the Indonesian Stock Market: an event study of presidential election on LQ45 Index Stocks. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 19(1), 40-49.

Kirikkaleli, D. (2020). The effect of domestic and foreign risks on an emerging stock market: A time series analysis. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 51, 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.11.005

Listyaningsih, E., Sariningsih, E., & Mudrikah, R. (2020). Stock Market Reaction to Indonesia Presidential and Legislative Election. Binus Business Review, 11(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v11i2.6302

Luhur, S. (2010). Reaksi Pasar Modal Indonesia Seputar Pemilihan Umum 8 Juli 2008 Pada Saham LQ-45. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 14(2), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v14i2.971

Mansur, F., & Jumaili, S. (2014). Reaksi pasar modal terhadap peristiwa pemilihan umum tahun 2014 pada perusahaan terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal penelitian Universitas Jambi: seri humaniora, 16(2), 43448.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (1997). Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Academy of management journal, 40(3), 626-657. https://doi.org/10.5465/257056

MKRI. (2023, Oktober). Batas Usia Capres-Cawapres 40 Tahun Atau Menduduki Jabatan yang Dipilih dari Pemilu/Pilkada. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=19660&menu=2

Musah, G., Domeher, D., & Musah, A. (2023). Presidential elections and stock return volatility: Evidence from selected sub-Saharan African stock markets. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 15(3), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-02-2023-0033

Nazir, M. S., Younus, H., Kaleem, A., & Anwar, Z. (2014). Impact of political events on stock market returns: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 30(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-03-2013-0011

Obradović, S., & Tomić, N. (2017). The effect of presidential election in the USA on stock return flow – a study of a political event. Economic Research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 30(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305802

Perwitasari, A. W., & Gunarsih, T. (2017). TVA, Abnormal Return, and Investor Perception on Changing of Tick Size 2 May 2016. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 21(3), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v21i3.1316

Roll, R. (1984). A Simple Implicit Measure of The Effective Bid-Ask Spread in an Efficient Market. The Journal of Finance, 4, 1127–1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03897.x

Ruven, R., Azam, A. N., & Ferry, S. (2019). Impact of presidential election on indonesian capital market: an event study analysis. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 7(91), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2019-07.18

Saragih, E. M., Sadalia, I., & Silalahi, A. S. (2019). The Impact of Presidential Election on Abnormal Return, Trading Volume Activity, Security Return Variability in Banking Industries Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Research & Review, 6(5), 246-261.

Sen, M. (2017). How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment. Political Research Quarterly, 70(2), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917695229

Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (2nd ed.). Penerbit Alfabeta.

Tempo. (2023, Oktober). Respons Tudingan Politik Dinasti, Gibran Rakabuming: Biar Warga yang Menilai. Tempo. https://pemilu.tempo.co/read/1787034/respons-tudingan-politik-dinasti-gibran-rakabuming-biar-warga-yang-menilai

Trinugroho, I., Fajrin, A., & Sutaryo, S. (2016). Is the effect of a political event more pronounced for government controlled firms? Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy Ventura, 19(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v19i2.629

Wardhani, R. S., Vebtasvili, Aprilian, R. I., Yanto, Suhdi, Yunita, A., & Agustina, D. (2022). Mengenal Saham. Penerbit K-Media.

Wei, J. (2021). Geopolitical Factor Impact of Brexit-related Events on Stocks. Proceeding. 5th International conference on education, management and social science (EMSS 2021), 239–252.

Wibowo, A., & Darmanto, S. (2017). Reaction of Indonesian Capital Market Investors to the Implementation of Tax Amnesty. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 21(4), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v21i4.1607

Wong, W.-Y., & Hooy, C.-W. (2020). Market response towards different types of politically connected firms during political events: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 17(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-09-2019-0331

Yudaruddin, R., & Lesmana, D. (2023). Banking sector’s reaction during the Russian invasion of Ukraine: Who reacted the most? Journal of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-04-2023-0206

Zulfikar, R., & Mayvita, P. A. (2017). The effects of political events against abnormal return and total volume sharia shares activity that listed in jakarta islamic index (JII). JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 14(02), 157. https://doi.org/10.31106/jema.v14i02.511




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v25i2.21000

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Office:
Ruang Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMY
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id

Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View My Stats