Interpretasi Investor Non-Profesional atas Implementasi International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 8 dan Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) 5 dalam Perspektif Framing Information

Erni Suryandari, Imelda Puspita Arisanti

Abstract


This study attemps to determines the effects of variable implementation of IFRS 8 which differs in IFRS 8 positive frame, IFRS 8 negative frame, PSAK 5 positive frame, and PSAK 5 negative frame toward non profesional investor’s interpretation. This experiment study is an experiment with factorial design 2x2 between subject. The subject is 120 participants from accounting undergraduate students of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta University as a subtitute of non professional investors. Data analysis used to test hypotetical result is multiple regression with additional analysis using SPSS ver. 16. The results show that segment information in IFRS 8 with positive frame positive and significantly affect non professional investor’s interpretation than those in PSAK 5 with positive frame. In contrast, segment information in PSAK 5 with negative frame positive and significantly affect non professional investor’s interpretation than those in IFRS 8 with negative frame. This study proves that assessment and individu interpretation can be affected by framing and Prospect Theory plays a role in option choosing and the assessment. There is no difference in interpretation by investor non professional when the information given such as difference format


Keywords


IFRS 8; PSAK 5; Framing Effect, Non Professional Investor’s Interpretation

Full Text:

Download Article

References


Arifin, A. 2004. Pengaruh Framing pada Keputusan Akuntansi Managerial dalam Perspektif Individu-kelompok: Pengujian atas Prospect Theory dan Fuzzy-Trace Theory. Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Bateman, T. dan C. Zeithaml. 1989. The Psychological Contest of Strategic Decisions: A Model and Covergent Experiment Findings. Strategic Managment Journal, 10, 59-74.

Behn, B. K., N. B. Nichols, dan D. L. Street. (2002). “The Predictive Ability of Geographic Segment Disclosures by U. S. Companies: SFAS No. 131 vs SFAS No. 14”. Journal of International Accounting Research. Vol. 1, 2002, pp 31-44.

Biyanto, F. 2001. Pengaruh Tanggungjawab, Motivasi Intrinsik dan Pembingkaian Informasi Anggaran dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Investasi dengan Group–Shifts sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Chen, P. F. dan G. Zhang. 2006. Segment Profitability, Misvaluation, and Corporate Divestment. HKUST Business School Research Paper No. 07-07. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Business School.

Crawford, L., C. Helliar dan D. Power. 2012. Politics or Accounting Principle: Why was IFRS 8 so Controvesional?. Publication of ICEW Centre of Business Performance. University of Dundee.

Elliot W.B. dan K. E. Jackson. 2006. The Association between Non-professional Investors’ Information Choices and Their Portfolio Returns: The Importance of Investing Experience. The Accounting Review.

Epstein, B. J. dan E. K. Jermakowicz. 2010. Interpretation and Application of International Financial reporting Standards. United States of America: Wiley Publishing.

Frederickson, J. R. dan J. S. Miller. 2004. The Effects of Proforma Earnings Disclosures on Analysts’ and Nonprofessional Investors’ Equity Valuation Judgments. The Accounting Review, 79 (3), 667-686.

Fortin, A. dan S. Berthelot. 2009. Annual Report Risk Disclosures and Non Professional Investor’s Judgments and Decisions. Research by Unversity du Quebec a Montreal dan University de Sherbrooke.

Hope, O. K., W. B. Thomas dan G. Winterbotham. 2004. The Impact of Nondisclosure of Geographic Segment Earnings on Earnings Predictability. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance.

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. 1994. Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) No. 5 Pelaporan Informasi Keuangan menurut Segmen. Jakarta: Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.

Nichols, N. B., D. L. Street dan A. Tarca. 2013. The Effect of Segment Reporting under IFRS 8 and SFAS 131 Management Approach: A Research Review”. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 24 (3).

Putri, N. K., Z. B. Supriyadi dan E. Nahartyo. 2012. “Experimental Test of Framing and Non-Professional Investor’s Decision: Study of Risk Information in IFRS No. 7. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 15 (2), 305-316.

Takemura, K. 1993. Influence of Elaboration on the Framing of Decision. The Journal of Psychology, 128 (1), 33- 39.

Tversky, A. dan D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Bias. Science Journal, 185, 1124-131.

Wardani, E. K. dan Sukirno. 2014. Pengaruh Framing Effect terhadap Keputusan Investasi dengan Locus of Control sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Nominal, 3 (1).

Wijayanti, G. A. dan C. H. Rusiti. 2014. Analisis Manajemen Laba di Tingkat Segmen Sebelum dan Sesudah Penerapan Adopsi IFRS 8 menjadi PSAK 5 (2009) pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal Ekonomi Akuntansi, 1-13.

Wulandari, T. R. 2011. Penerapan Standar Akuntansi Pelaporan dan Pengungkapan Segmen oleh Perusahaan Multinasional. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pajak, 14 (1).

Yahya, M. N. dan J. Surya. 2012. Pengaruh Framing Effect sebagai Determinan Escalation of Commitment dalam Keputusan Investasi: Dampak dari Working Experience. Jurnal Akuntansi, 4 (2), 153-154.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.18165

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 68 times
Download Article - 54 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Office:
Certified Public Accountant (CPA) Test Centre Room
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2 Pojok Barat, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id
Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 334)

Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.