The mediating role of innovation on enabling and coercive control in enhancing HEIs performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v26i2.25541Keywords:
Coercive Control, Enabling Control, Higher Education Performance, HEIs Governance, Innovation, Management Control SystemAbstract
Research aims: In a competitive environment, leaders of higher education institutions (HEIs) must adopt strategies to enhance performance. This study examines the role of management control systems (MCS) in fostering innovation to improve HEIs performance.
Design/Methodology/Approach: Using a quantitative approach, data were collected through surveys from 210 lecturers at private HEIs in Indonesia, employing random sampling techniques. Hypothesis testing was conducted using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).
Research findings: The results reveal that MCS, encompassing both enabling and coercive control, significantly enhances higher education performance. Additionally, innovation was found to impact performance positively. The results also showed that innovation mediated the relationship between MCS implementation and performance improvement, suggesting that supportive leadership and constructive feedback from leaders not only encourage innovation but also contribute to improving overall organizational outcomes.
Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study is among the first to conceptualize MCS through the dual lenses of enabling and coercive control as a catalyst for innovation in higher education. Integrating management control theory with innovation-driven performance frameworks it contributes to both academic discourse and practical HEIs governance.
Research limitation/Implication: A key limitation is the focus solely on private higher education. Future research should compare private and public higher education, as differing organizational cultures and regulations may influence control system effectiveness and innovation. The findings offer theoretical insights into the relationship between MCS, innovation, and performance in higher education while also providing practical guidance for higher education managers in designing effective strategies.
References
Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative science quarterly 41(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393986
Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2004). Souplesse et efficience: Une etude sur le terrain des systemes de controle de gestion d’une chaine de restauration. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 271–301. https://doi.org/10.1506/VJR6-RP75-7GUX-XH0X
Alharbi, I. B., Jamil, R., Mahmood, N. H. N., & Shaharoun, A. M. (2023). Transformational leadership’s impact on organizational innovation: The mediating role of management control system. Global Business Review, 24(6), 1418-1433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920934640
Alharbi, Y. M. (2020). Super Twisting Fractional Order Energy Management Control for a Smart University System Integrated DC Micro-Grid. IEEE Access, 8, 128692–128704. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3008858
Al-Jayyousi, O., Al-Alawi, A., Al-Mahamid, S., & Bugawa, A. (2019). Entrepreneurial University and Organizational Innovation: The Case of Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain. In Management and Administration of Higher Education Institutions at Times of Change, 117–136. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-627-420191008
Al-Tarawneh, H. A., & Mubaslat, M. M. (2012). Design and Use of Management Accounting and Control Systems in the Jordanian Universities’ Faculties. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 1(1), 242. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v1i1.773
Arrieta, M. del C., & Avolio, B. (2020). Factors of higher education quality service: the case of a Peruvian university. Quality Assurance in Education, 28(4), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-03-2020-0037
Asif, M., & Searcy, C. (2014). A composite index for measuring performance in higher education institutions. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 31(9), 983–1001. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2013-0023
Badri, M. A., & Abdulla, M. H. (2004). Awards of excellence in institutions of higher education: An AHP approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540410538813
Balaboniene, I., & Vecerskiene, G. (2014). The Peculiarities of Performance Measurement in Universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 605–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.249
Bernd, D. C., & Beuren, I. M. (2022). Do enabling management control systems stimulate innovation? Business Process Management Journal, 28(2), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-09-2021-0588
Beuren, I. M., dos Santos, V., & Bernd, D. C. (2022). Effects of using the management control system on individual performance with the intervenience of feedforward and organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(4), 1042–1060. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2021-0055
Beuren, I. M., & dos Santos, V. (2019). Enabling and coercive management control systems and organizational resilience. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 30(81). https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201908210
Beuren, I. M., Souza, G. E. de, & Bernd, D. C. (2021). Effects of budget system use on innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2019-0166
Bisbe, J., Kruis, A. M., & Madini, P. (2019). Coercive, enabling, diagnostic, and interactive control: Untangling the threads of their connections. Journal of Accounting Literature, 43(1), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACCLIT.2019.10.001
Biswas, S. S. N., & Akroyd, C. (2022). Management control systems and the strategic management of innovation. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-04-2021-0083
Bobe, B. J., & Taylor, D. W. (2010, July). Use of management control systems in university faculties: evidence of diagnostic versus interactive approaches by the upper echelons. In the sixth Asia Pacific interdisciplinary research in accounting conference, Sydney. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228384659
Brittingham, B., Harris, M. J., Lambert, M., Murray, F., Peterson, G., Trapnell, J., Vlasses, P., Wheelan, B., Wolff, R., Zlotlow, S., & Eaton, J. (2010). The Value of Accreditation. Council for Higher Education Accreditation. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/ValueofAccreditation.pdf
Brown, W. O. (2001). Faculty participation in university governance and the effects on university performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00136-0
Burney, L. L., Henle, C. A., & Widener, S. K. (2009). A path model examining the relations among strategic performance measurement system characteristics, organizational justice, and extra- and in-role performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.11.002
Cable, D. M., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. (2013). Breaking them in or eliciting their best? Reframing socialization around newcomers’ authentic self-expression. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213477098
Chadwick, C., & Dabu, A. (2009). Human resources, human resource management, and the competitive advantage of firms: Toward a more comprehensive model of causal linkages. Organization Science, 20(1), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0375
Chapman, C. S. (1998). Accountants in organisational networks. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(8), 737–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00033-6
Choi, B. K., Moon, H. K., & Ko, W. (2013). An organization’s ethical climate, innovation, and performance: Effects of support for innovation and performance evaluation. Management Decision, 51(6), 1250–1275. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-Sep-2011-0334
Davila, A., & Ditillo, A. (2017). Management control systems for creative teams: Managing stylistic creativity in fashion companies. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(3), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51806
Dicker, R., Garcia, M., Kelly, A., & Mulrooney, H. (2019). What does ‘quality’ in higher education mean? Perceptions of staff, students and employers. Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), 1425–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1445987
Dimes, R., & de Villiers, C. (2020). How management control systems enable and constrain integrated thinking. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(4), 851–872. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-05-2020-0880
Doornich, J. B., Kaarbøe, K., & Bourmistrov, A. (2019). The tension between intention and attention: Dialectic changes in the coercive and enabling orientations of organizational rules. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 16(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-06-2017-0056
Ekstrom, C. (2020). Enabling and Coercive Control: Coexistence in the Case of Banking. In Enabling Control in Organizations.
Endenich, C., Lachmann, M., Schachel, H., & Zajkowska, J. (2022). The relationship between management control systems and innovativeness in start-ups: evidence for product, business model, and ambidextrous innovation. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change 19(5), 706-734. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-06-2022-0087
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2005). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Goos, M., & Salomons, A. (2017). Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations. Research in Higher Education, 58, 341-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9429-8
Gordon, O. O., & Kalenzi, A. (2019). Internal control and quality service delivery in a public health sector: A case study of a Local Government in Uganda. African Journal of Business Management, 13(16), 557–563. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm2019.8819
Gupta, P., & Sharma, A. M. (2014). A Study of the Impact of Corporate Governance Practices on Firm Performance in Indian and South Korean Companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.163
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354331182
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair. J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Henao-García, E. A., & Cardona Montoya, R. A. (2024). Management innovation and its relation to innovation outcomes and firm performance: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(8), 2393-2418.. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2022-0564
Henri, J. F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.07.001
Hokayem, J. El, & Kairouz, A. (2014). Euro-med: Public Management and Good Local Governance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.516
Hui, C. H., Cheng, K., & Gan, Y. (2003). Psychological collectivism as a moderator of the impact of supervisor–subordinate personality similarity on employees’ service quality. Applied Psychology, 52(2), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00130
Ibrahim, H. A.-H. (2014). Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Education. Open Journal of Education, 2(2), 106. https://evqa.ut.ac.ir/file/download/page/1647246079-qualityassurance.pdf
Iqbal, S., Taib, C. A. Bin, & Razalli, M. R. (2024). The effect of accreditation on higher education performance through quality culture mediation: the perceptions of administrative and quality managers. TQM Journal, 36(2), 572–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2022-0322
Ismail, T. (2016). Culture control, capability and performance: Evidence from creative industries in Indonesia. Asian Review of Accounting, 24(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-01-2014-0014
Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Meyer, M. W. (2003). Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: Evidence from a balanced scorecard. The accounting review, 78(3), 725-758. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.725
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
Kardos, M. (2012). The Reflection of Good Governance in Sustainable Development Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1166–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1098
Kim, N. Y., & Miller, G. (2008). Perceptions of the ethical climate in the Korean tourism industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 941-954. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25482340
Kim, T. (2008). Changing university governance and management in the UK and elsewhere under market conditions: Issues of quality assurance and accountability. Intellectual Economics, 8011(2).
Kocak, A., Carsrud, A., & Oflazoglu, S. (2017). Market, entrepreneurial, and technology orientations: impact on innovation and firm performance. Management Decision, 55(2), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2015-0146
Koufteros, X., Verghese, A., & Lucianetti, L. (2014). The effect of performance measurement systems on firm performance: A cross-sectional and a longitudinal study. Journal of Operations Management, 32(6), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.06.003
Pangkalan Data Pendidikan Tinggi. (2024). Statistik Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://pddikti.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/statistik
Kumar, P., Shukla, B., & Passey, D. (2020). Impact of Accreditation on Quality and Excellence of Higher Education Institutions. Revista Investigacion Operacional, 41(2). https://rev-inv-ope.pantheonsorbonne.fr/sites/default/files/inline-files/41220-01.pdf
Lill, P., Wald, A., & Munck, J. C. (2020). In the field of tension between creativity and efficiency: a systematic literature review of management control systems for innovation activities. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 919–950. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0329
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
Mahama, H., & Cheng, M. M. (2013). The effect of managers’ enabling perceptions on costing system use, psychological empowerment, and task performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-50333
Marin-Idarraga, D. A., & Cuartas-Marin, J. C. (2019). Relationship between innovation and performance: Impact of competitive intensity and the organizational slack. RAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 59(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020190203
Moores, K., & Mula, J. (2000). The Salience of Market, Bureaucratic, and Clan Controls in the Management of Family Firm Transitions: Some Tentative Australian Evidence. Family Business Review, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00091.x
Muktiyanto, A., Hermawan, A. A., & Hadiwidjaja, R. D. (2020). The role of management control systems in the performance of higher education through good university governance. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 13(3), 288-310. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2020.108777
Nani, D. A., & Safitri, V. A. D. (2021). Exploring the relationship between formal management control systems, organisational performance and innovation: The role of leadership characteristics. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 14(1), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol14no1.8
Nedwek, B. P., & Neal, J. E. (1994). Performance indicators and rational management tools: A compatative assessment of projects in North America and Europe. Research in Higher education, 35, 75-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496663
Nofianti, L., & Suseno, N. S. (2014). Factors Affecting Implementation of Good Government Governance (GGG) and their Implications towards Performance Accountability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.056
Octavianus, S., Triposa, R., Sari, D., Mononimbar, Y., Parluhutan, T., Salatiga-Kopeng, K. M., & Getasan, S. D. (2021). The role of TQM approach in Indonesia higher education quality assurance. In International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education ICLSSEE. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-3-2021.2306449
Pratolo, S., Mukti, A. H., & Sofyani, H. (2022). The Service Quality of Community Health Centers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Do Governance Practices Benefit? Journal of Accounting and Investment, 23(2), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v23i2.14324
Radianto, W. E. D. (2015). Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen Di Entrepreneural University. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 6(2), 272-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2015.08.6022
Radtke, R. R., & Widener, S. K. (2016). The complex world of control: Integration of ethics and uses of control. Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, 31, 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-351220160000031002
Sa’adon, S. K. A. M. A. & R. A. (2019). Management Control System and Innovation: Implication for Malaysian Manufacturing Innovation Performance. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17576/ajag-2019-12-13
Santos, V. dos, & Beuren, I. M. (2022). How enabling and coercive control systems influence individuals’ behaviors? Analysis under the lens of construal level theory. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change 19(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-02-2022-0026
Sasmita, D., Saarce, D., & Hatane, E. (2017). Pengaruh Management Control System Terhadap Customer Oriented Measures Melalui Employee Oriented Measures Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Business Accounting Review, 5(1), 433–444.
Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. (2017). Organization culture and leadership (5th Edition). Wiley
Shurafa, R., & Mohamed, R. B. (2016). Management control system, organizational learning, and firm’s performance: An empirical study from developing economy. International Journal of advanced and applied sciences, 3(10), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2016.10.013.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of management, 37(5), 1390-1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385695
Sofyani, H., Abu Hasan, H., & Saleh, Z. (2022a). Does internal control contribute to quality management in higher education institutions? Indonesia’s adoption experience of the COSO integrated framework. TQM Journal 35(8). https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2022-0201
Sofyani, H., Abu Hasan, H., & Saleh, Z. (2022b). Internal control implementation in higher education institutions: determinants, obstacles and contributions toward governance practices and fraud mitigation. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2020-0246
Spanò, R., & Zagaria, C. (2022). Performance Management Systems: Emerging Issues and Future Trends. In Integrating Performance Management and Enterprise Risk Management Systems: Emerging Issues and Future Trends, 5-33. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-151-920221002
Spekle, R. F., van Elten, H. J., & Widener, S. K. (2017). Creativity and control: A paradox Evidence from the levers of control framework. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 29(2), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51759
Stark, E., & Hester, M. (2019). Coercive Control: Update and Review. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218816191
Subramanian, A. (1996). Organizational Innovativeness: Exploring the Relationship Between Organizational Determinants of Innovation, Types of Innovations, and Measures of Organizational Performance. In Int. J. Mgmt Sci. Vo| (Vol. 24, Issue 6) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00031-X.
Torre, D. L. E. M., Gomez-Sancho, J.-M., & Perez-Esparrells, C. (2017). Comparing university performance by legal status: a Malmquist-type index approach for the case of the Spanish higher education system. Tertiary Education and Management, 23(3), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1296966
Toyosaki, H. (2024). The effect of enabling performance measurement systems on team learning behaviour and team effectiveness. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 24(4), 919–938. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2023-0390
Urdari, C., Farcas, T. V., & Tiron-Tudor, A. (2017). Assessing the legitimacy of HEIs’ contributions to society: The perspective of international rankings. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2015-0108
Van der Steen, M. P. (2022). Identity work of management accountants in a merger: The construction of identity in liminal space. Management Accounting Research, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2022.100792
Van Triest, S., Kloosterman, H., & Groen, B. A. C. (2023). Under which circumstances are enabling control and control extensiveness related to employee performance? Management Accounting Research, 59, 100831. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MAR.2023.100831
Van Veen-Dirks, P. M. G., Leliveld, M. C., & Kaufmann, W. (2021). The effect of enabling versus coercive performance measurement systems on procedural fairness and red tape. Journal of Management Control, 32, 269–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-021-00316-5
Vlasceanu, L., Grunberg, L., & Parlea, D. (2007). Quality Assurance and Accreditation: A Glossary of Basic Terms and DefinitionsQuality Assurance and Accreditation: A Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000134621
Wanous, J. P. (1992). Organizationa entry : recruitment, selection, orientation, and socialization of newcomers (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Reading, Mass.
Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 757–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.01.001
Wijethilake, C., Munir, R., & Appuhami, R. (2018). Environmental Innovation Strategy and Organizational Performance: Enabling and Controlling Uses of Management Control Systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3259-7
Yaakub, M. H., & Mohamed, Z. A. (2020). Measuring the performance of private higher education institutions in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(3), 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-10-2018-0208
Zheng, S., Zhang, W., & du, J. (2011). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 1035–1051. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179352
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Reni Farwitawati, Tubagus Ismail, Imam Abu Hanifah, Ina Indriana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
License
Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
