Pengukuran Kinerja Non Finansial: Suatu Cara meningkatkan ‘Value’ Perusahaan

Main Article Content

Ietje Nazaruddin

Abstract

The primary purpose performance evaluation is to motivate employees to attain organizational goals and to comply with predetermined behavior standards to produce desire actions and out comes. The behavior standards could be prescribed managerial policies or formal plans for desire integrated actions (Siegel, 1989). Innovation in measuring the financial performance of these organizations played a vital role in their successful growth at the industrial age. Unfortunately, Financial measure are used for monitoring purpose are not under the complete control of the people being monitored (Zimmermen, 1995). At its heart, an overemphasis on achieving and maintaining short-term financial results can cause companies to overinvest in short-term fixes and to underinvest in long-term value creation, particularly in the intangible and intellectual assets that generate (Kaplan, 1999) The emergence of the information era requires the new measurements systems, that complete financial measurement to improve competitive organizations. The non-financial measurement complement financial measures of the drivers of future performance to superior performance. Non financial measure can solve to overemphasis maximize short-term financial result if only financial measure uses. Kaplan introduces the way to solve the irresistible force to build long-range competitive capabilities and the immovable object of the historical-cost financial accounting model has created a new synthesis: the Balanced Scorecard

Article Details

How to Cite
Nazaruddin, I. (2015). Pengukuran Kinerja Non Finansial: Suatu Cara meningkatkan ‘Value’ Perusahaan. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 1(1), 32–40. Retrieved from https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai/article/view/458
Section
Articles

References

Frederick F Reichheld. 1996. Learning from Customer Defection, Harvard Business Review, hal. 56-69.

Jerold L. Zimmerman. 1995. Accounting for Decision Making and Control, Richard D Irwin, Inc.

Ietje. 1998. Pengaruh Desentralisasi dan Karakteristik Informasi Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen terhadap Kinerja Manajerial, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, hal 141-162.

Lawrence S Maisel. 1996. Performance Measurement: The Balanced Scorecard Approach, hal. 1-6.

Robert E Lusch, Michael. 1994. The Case for an off-Balanced-Sheet Controller, Sloan Management Review, Hal 101-104.

Robert S Kaplan, David P Norton .1996. Using the Balanced Scorecard as Strategic Management System, Harvard Business Review, Hal. 75-85.

———————. 1992. The Balanced Scorecard measure that Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review , hal 71-79.

——————. 1996. Translating Strategy into Action ‘The Balanced Scorecard’, Harvard Business Scholl Press Boston

Siegel. 1989. Behavioral Accounting, South-western Publishing Co.

Stanley F Slater. 1996. The Challenge of Sustaining Competitive Advantage, Industrial Marketing Management, Hal. 79-86.