Peer Review : Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Jasa Firma Akuntan Publik

Harjanti Widiastuti

Abstract


In recent years, most people ask qualities of CPA firm’s work in accounting and auditing services. In response to the call for more accountability, public accountants should make “audit” or review to their work and disclose more detail their operations. In 1977, the Amarican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) established a review mechanism referred to as “peer review” or some people called “auditor’s audit” The result of Maier and Fuglister’s survey indicated that peer review program is perceived by auditors as one of the most important appraisal activities to improve audit quality. Depart from their survey, this article describe a simple explanation concerning quality control system as a background and guidance to perform peer review, peer review concept itself and how audit quality can be improved through peer review.


Keywords


Quality Control System; Peer Review; Prevention Activities; Appraisal Activities

Full Text:

Download Article

References


AICPA, 1995, “Peer Review Standards Interpretation no.1”, Journal of Accountancy, September, pp. 118.

Auditing Standards Board, 1996, “Statement on Quality Control Standards No 2 dan 3”, Journal of Accountancy, August, pp. 107-110.

Botwin, Bruce S., 1989, “Arranging for A Successful Review”, Journal of Accountancy, December, pp. 72-80.

Bremser, Wayne G. et. al, 1988, “CPA Firm Peer Review : Do They Inprove Quality” The CPA Journal, May, pp. 75-77.

Carmichael, D.R. dan John J. Willingham, 1985, “Perspective in Auditing”, Mc Graw-Hill Inc.

Cook, J. Michael dan Haldon G. Robinson, 1979, “Peer Review – The Accounting Profession’s Program”, The CPA Journal, March, pp. 11-16.

Dennis, Anita, 1997, “A Refresher Course in Peer Review”, Journal of Accountancy, February, pp. 72-73.

Ehlen, Craig R. Dan Robert B. Welker, 1996, “Practitioners’ Suggestions for Improving Practice Monitoring”, The CPA Journal, July, pp. 20-25.

Ever, Charles J. dan David B. Pearson, 1989, “Lessons Learned from Peer Review”, Journal of Accountancy, April, pp. 96-105.

Hoover, Delano C, dan Glenn A. Roberts, 1996, “Avoiding Peer Review Findings. Part 2”, The Ohio CPA Journal, February, pp. 42-44.

Macklin, Marie., 1989, “How Three Firm Benefited from Peer Review”, Journal of Accountancy, June, pp. 87-90.

Mancuso, Anthony J, 1991, “The Road To Quality”, The CPA Journal, September, pp. 94-95.

_______, 1992, “The Third Year of Quality Review Begin-Now It’s Sole Practitioners’ Turn”, The CPA Journal, June, pp. 86-87.

Meier, Heidi Hylton, dan Jayne Fuglister., 1992, “How to Improve Audit Quality : Perceptions of Auditors and Clients”, The Ohio CPA Journal, June, pp. 21-24.

Schemutte, James dan John R. Thieling, 1996, “Quality Control Standards Revisited”, The CPA Journal, June, pp. 14-18.

Shapiro, Leslie S., 1996, “Quality Review fo Quality Work”, National Public Accountant, November, p. 7.

Stauffer, C. David, et al., 1989, “How to Prepare For Your First Review”, Journal of Accountancy, August, pp. 80-82.

Zeronda, Willian A., 1997, “Peer Review Ensures CPAS Keep High Standards”, Capital District Business Review, Vol 23, p. 19.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Office:
Ruang Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMY
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id

Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View My Stats