Reaksi Pasar terhadap Ketepatwaktuan Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan

Muchamad Syafruddin

Abstract


The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether there is market reaction to the timeliness of financial report submission. Market reaction is surrogated by the impact the firms no to submit financial report on timelines on the quality of earnings information/ERC (hypothesis 1). Secondary objectives of this study is to investigate whether there is impact degree of persistence, growth, and predictability on the quality of earnings information/ERC (hypothesis 2). The second secondary objectives of this study is to investigate whether there is impact degree of risk (β) on the quality of earnings information/ERC (hypothesis 3). The third secondary objectives of  this study is to investigate whether there is impact firm size on the quality of earnings information/ERC (hypothesis 4). To conclude all of the objectives mentioned above, in model 1, cumulative abnormal returns 1 (CAR 1) are regressed on dummy (D), unexpected earnings (MUE), multiplication of dummy (D) and unexpected earnings (MUE), multiplication of market book value (MBV) and unexpected earnings (MUE), multiplication of risk (β) and unexpected earnings (MUE), and multiplication of firm size (FZ) and unexpected earnings (MUE). Furthermore, in model 2, cumulative abnormal returns 2 (CAR 2) are regressed on dummy (D), unexpected earnings (MUE), multiplication of dummy (D) and unexpected earnings (MUE), multiplication of market book value (MBV) and unexpected earnings (MUE), multiplication of risk (β) and unexpected earnings (MUE), and multiplication of firm size (FZ) and unexpected earnings (MUE). While in model 1, cumulative abnormal returns (CAR 1) are measured using event windows, from 5 days before to 5 days after the submission of financial report [-5,+5], in model 2, cumulative abnormal returns (CAR 2) are measured using event windows, from 10 days before to 10 days after the submission of financial report [-10,+10]. Chow F-Test is also used to conclude whether there is impact the firms not to submit financial report on timelines on the quality of earnings information. This study uses the sample of 82 firm years of manufacturing firms listed on the Jakarta Stock Exchange. This study uses one observation periods, 1998 – 2001 with 82 cases. The results of this study shows that the null hypothesis 1, 2  and 3 can be rejected on both model 1 and model 2. Inversely, this study shows that the null hypothesis 4 can not be rejected on both model 1 and model 2. The Chow F-Test shows that the firms not to submit financial report on timelines impacts on the quality of earnings information

Keywords


Timelines of Financial Submission; Persistence; Growth; Predictability of Earnings; Risk (Β); Firm Size; Quality Of Earnings Information; ERC

Full Text:

Download Article

References


Accounting Principles Board, “Basic Concepts and Accounting Principles Underlying Financial Statements,” Statement No. 4 (American Institutes of Certified Public Accountants), October, 1970

Ainun, N. 1998. Timeliness of Annual Financial Statement Submission: A Preliminary Empirical Evidence From Indonesia. Working paper. Gadjah Mada University

Alford. A., J. Jones. Dan M. Zmijewski. Extention and violation of the statutory SEC from 10-K fillin requirements. Journal of Accounting an Economics 17 (January) : 229 – 254

Ansah, S. Owusu, 2000, Timelines of Corporate Financial Reporting in Emerging Capital Markets: Empirical Evidence from the Zimbabwe Stock, Journal Accounting and Business Research, Vo. 30, 241- 267.

Bae, B. dan H. Sami. 1999. The Effect of Environmental Liabilities on Earnings Reaksise Coefficients. Working paper. Virginia Commonwealth University dan Temple University.

Ball R. dan Brown, 1968. An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 159-178.

Bambang Sutop, 2001, Dampak Pemoderasi Perataan Laba Terhadap kandungan Informasi Inkremental Arus Kas, Disertasi, Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Bapepam, 1996, Himpunan Peraturan Pasar Modal Indonesia

Bates, R., 1968, Discussion of the Information Content of Annual Earnings

Announcement, Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies, Supplement Vol. 6, Journal of Accounting Research, 93-95.

Beaver, W.H. 1968. The Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcements.

Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement): 67-92.

---------R.Clarke, dan W.F. Wright. 1979. The Association Between Unsystematic

Security Return and the Magnitude of Earnings Forecast Errors. Journal of Accounting Research 17 (Autumn): 316-340.

---------R. Lambert, dan D. Morse 1980. The Information content of Security Prices, Jounal of Accounting and Economics (March): 3-28.

--------dan S. Ryan 1987. The Information Content of Security Prices: A Second Look, Jounal of Accounting and Economics (March): 149-158.

Biddle, G.C. dan G.S. Seow. 1991. The Estimation and Determinants of Associations between Return and Earnings: Evidence from Cross-Industry Comparation.

Journal of Accounting, Audit and Finance (Spring): 183-232.

Brown, S.J. dan J.B. Warner. 1980. Measuring Security Price Performance. Journal of Financial Economics 8 (September): 205-208.

--------, 1985. Using Daily Stock Return: The Case of Events Studies. Journal of Financial Economics 14: 3-31.

Cho, J.Y. dan K. Jung. 1991. Earnings Reaksise Coeficients: A Synthesis of Theory and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature 10: 85-116.

Choi, S.K. , 1990. Managerial Incentives and Earnings Reaksise Coeficients, Working Paper, Vanderbilt University.

---------dan C. Jeter. 1992. The Effects of Qualified Audit Opinions on Earnings

Reaksise Coeficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics 15: 229-247.

Collins, D. W. dan S. P. Kothari. 1989. An Analysis of Intertemporal and Cross- sectional Determinants of Earnings Reaksise Coeficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11:143-182.

---------dan L. DeAngelo. 1990. Accounting Information and Corporate Governance: Market and Analyst Reactions to Earnings of Firms Enganged in Proxy Contests. Journal of Accounting and Economics 13: 213-247.

---------dan W. Salatka, 1993. Noisy Accounting Earnings Signals and Earnings

Reaksise Coeficients: The Case of Foreign Currency Accounting. Contemporary Accounting Research 10, N0. 1: 119-159.

Courtis, J, K. 1976, Relationship between Timelines in Corporate Reporting and Corporate Attribute, Accounting and Business Research, 45-56

Dhaliwal, D.S. dan S.S. Reynolds. 1994. The Effect of the Default risk of Debt on the Earning Reaksise Coeficients. The Accounting Review 69, No. 2 (April): 412-419.

Dyer, J. C. and Arthur J. McHugh, 1975, The Timelines of Australian Annual Reports, Journal of Accounting Research, 204-219

Easton, P. D. dan M. Zmijewski. 1989. Cross-sectional Variation in the Stock Market Reaksise to Accounting Earnings Announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11: 117-141.

---------dan T.S. Harris. 1991. Earnings as an Explanatory Variable for Returns. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Spring): 19-36.

Financial Accounting Standard Board, Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts No.2: The qualitative characteristic of financial information, (American Institutes of Certified Public Accountants), October, 1980

Foster. 1986. Financial Statement Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Givoly, D., dan D. Palmon. 1982. Timelines of Annual Earnings Announcements: Some Empirical Evidence. The Accounting Review 57 (July): 486-508.

Grahita Chandrarin, 2002, Pengaruh Kerugian Perdagangan Valutas Asing Terhadap ERC: Studi di Bursa Efek Jakarta, Disertasi, Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Hayn, C. 1995. The Information Content of Losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (September): 125-153.

Harikumar, T. dan C.I. Harter. 1995. Earnings Reaksise Coeficients and Persistence: New Evidence using Tobin'q as a proxy for persistence. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance (Spring) 401-420.

Holthausen, R. dan R. Verrecchia. 1988. The Effect of Sequential Information Releases on the Variance of Price Change in an Intertemporal multi-assets Market, Journal of Accounting Research 26, 82-106

Imhoff, E. dan G. Lobo. 1992. The Effect of Ex Ante Earnings Uncertainty on Earnings Reaksise Coeficiets. The Accounting Review 67 (April): 427-439.

Jogiyanto, Hartono. 1999. Bias di Beta Sekuritas dan Koreksinya Untuk Pasar Modal

yang Sedang Berkembang: Bukti Empiris di Bursa Efek Jakarta, Seminar Nasional dan Hasil-hasil Penelitian Forum Komunikasi Penelitian Manajemen dan Bisnis V. Universitas Diponegoro.

Kothari, S.P. dan J.L. Zimmerman. 1995. Price and Return Models. Journal of

Accounting and Economics 20 (September): 155-192.

---------, 2001, Capital Market Research in Accounting, Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (September): 155-192.

Kormendi, R. dan R. Lipe. 1987. Earnings Innovation, Earning Persistence and Stock Returns. Journal of Business 60 (July): 323-345.

Lawrence, E., 1983., Reporting delays for failed firms. Journal of Accounting Research 21 (Autumn): 606-610

Lee, B. B. dan H. Sami. 1996. The effect of R&D and advertising outlays on earnings reaksise coeficiet. Working Paper. Concordia University dan Temple University.

Lev, B. 1989. On The Usefulness of Earnings and Earnings Research: Lessons and Direction from two Decades of Empirical Research. Journal of Accounting Research 27 (Supplement): 153-192

Lipe, R. 1990. The Relation Between Stock Returns and Accounting Given Alternatif Information. The Accounting Research (January): 49-71.

Muchamad, Syafruddin, 2001, The Effect of Timelines of Financial Reporting on Earnings Reaksise Coeficients: A Prelimanary Empirical Study in Jakarta Stock Exchange, Working Paper, The Fourth Asian Academy of Management (AAM) Conference 2001: Proceedings, Johor Bahru, Malaysia. 24-33.

Pincus, M. 1991. Accounting Methods and Differential Market Reaksise to The Announcement of Earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance.

Schwartz, K. dan B. Soo 1996. Evidence of regulatory non-complience with SEC disclosure rules on auditor changes. The Accounting Review 4 (October): 555- 572.

Shevlin, T. dan d. shores. 1993. Firm Size, Security Returns, and Unexpected Returns: The Anomalous Signed-Suze Effect. Contemporary Accounting Research. 10, No.1 (Fall): 1-30.

Suwardjono. 1997. The Impact of Accounting Methods on The Association Between Unexpected Earnings and Abnormal Return: The Case of Oil and Gas Industry. Unpublished Desertasi. Kent State University.

Teets, W.R. 1992. The Association between Stock Market Reaksises to Earnings Announcements and Regulation of Electric Utilities. Journal of Accounting Research 30 (Autumn): 274-285.

---------dan C.E. Wasley. 1996. Estimating Earnings Reaksise Coeficients: Pooled versus Firm-specific Models. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21 (June): 279-295.

Teoh, S.H. dan T.J. Wong. 1993. Perceived Auditor Quality and Earning Reaksise Coeficients. The Accounting Review 68 (April): 346-366.

Watts, R., L., 1978, Systematic Abnormal Return After Quartely Earnings

Announcements, Journal of Financial Economics, 127-150

Wasley, C., 1991. Mandatory Accounting Changes and Earnings Reaksise Coeficients: SFAS No. 2 and Accounting for Research and Development Costs, Working paper, Washington University.

Whittred, G. 1982. Audit Qualification and The Timelines of Corporate Annual Reports. The Accounting Review. LV, 4 (October): 563-577.

---------dan I. Zimmer. 1984. Timelines of Financial Reporting and Financial Distress.

The Accounting Review. LIX, 2 (April): 287-295.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Office:
Ruang Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMY
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id

Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View My Stats