About the Journal

JOURNAL HISTORY

JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi was first published in February 2010 and next published consistently every February and October.
JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi since 2020 is published three times a year, i.e. in April, August, and December.
December 2020, JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi is accredited grade 4 by the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of Indonesia, Decree (SK) No. 28/E/KPT/2019 valid from Vol 9 No 1 (2018) until Vol 13 No 1 (2022).
December 2023, JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi is accredited grade 2 by the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of Indonesia, Decree (SK) 79/E/KPT/2023 valid from Vol 13 No 2 (2022) until Vol 18 No 1 (2027).

FOCUS AND SCOPE

JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi is a continuous scientific journal (met twice). The main purpose of this journal is to disseminate scientific articles in the field of business, which have a theoretical and implementation foundation. In this regard, the related article must be related to the science of business management and financial accounting related to business practices. Editors accept scientific articles that have not been received, both in Indonesian and English

Focus and Scope:

Business
Management
Marketing
Finance
Theoretical and implementation foundation

SECTION POLICIES

Article

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative

An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an unprecedented public good. The old tradition is the willingness of scientists and scholars to publish the fruits of their research in scholarly journals without payment, for the sake of inquiry and knowledge. The new technology is the internet. The public good they make possible is the world-wide electronic distribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and other curious minds. Removing access barriers to this literature will accelerate research, enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor and the poor with the rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the foundation for uniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for knowledge.

For various reasons, this kind of free and unrestricted online availability, which we will call open access, has so far been limited to small portions of the journal literature. But even in these limited collections, many different initiatives have shown that open access is economically feasible, that it gives readers extraordinary power to find and make use of relevant literature, and that it gives authors and their works vast and measurable new visibility, readership, and impact. To secure these benefits for all, we call on all interested institutions and individuals to help open up access to the rest of this literature and remove the barriers, especially the price barriers, that stand in the way. The more who join the effort to advance this cause, the sooner we will all enjoy the benefits of open access.

The literature that should be freely accessible online is that which scholars give to the world without expectation of payment. Primarily, this category encompasses their peer-reviewed journal articles, but it also includes any unreviewed preprints that they might wish to put online for comment or to alert colleagues to important research findings. There are many degrees and kinds of wider and easier access to this literature. By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.

While the peer-reviewed journal literature should be accessible online without cost to readers, it is not costless to produce. However, experiments show that the overall costs of providing open access to this literature are far lower than the costs of traditional forms of dissemination. With such an opportunity to save money and expand the scope of dissemination at the same time, there is today a strong incentive for professional associations, universities, libraries, foundations, and others to embrace open access as a means of advancing their missions. Achieving open access will require new cost recovery models and financing mechanisms, but the significantly lower overall cost of dissemination is a reason to be confident that the goal is attainable and not merely preferable or utopian.

To achieve open access to scholarly journal literature, we recommend two complementary strategies.

I. Self-Archiving: First, scholars need the tools and assistance to deposit their refereed journal articles in open electronic archives, a practice commonly called, self-archiving. When these archives conform to standards created by the Open Archives Initiative, then search engines and other tools can treat the separate archives as one. Users then need not know which archives exist or where they are located in order to find and make use of their contents.

II. Open-access Journals: Second, scholars need the means to launch a new generation of journals committed to open access, and to help existing journals that elect to make the transition to open access. Because journal articles should be disseminated as widely as possible, these new journals will no longer invoke copyright to restrict access to and use of the material they publish. Instead they will use copyright and other tools to ensure permanent open access to all the articles they publish. Because price is a barrier to access, these new journals will not charge subscription or access fees, and will turn to other methods for covering their expenses. There are many alternative sources of funds for this purpose, including the foundations and governments that fund research, the universities and laboratories that employ researchers, endowments set up by discipline or institution, friends of the cause of open access, profits from the sale of add-ons to the basic texts, funds freed up by the demise or cancellation of journals charging traditional subscription or access fees, or even contributions from the researchers themselves. There is no need to favor one of these solutions over the others for all disciplines or nations, and no need to stop looking for other, creative alternatives.

Open access to peer-reviewed journal literature is the goal. Self-archiving (I.) and a new generation of open-access journals (II.) are the ways to attain this goal. They are not only direct and effective means to this end, they are within the reach of scholars themselves, immediately, and need not wait on changes brought about by markets or legislation. While we endorse the two strategies just outlined, we also encourage experimentation with further ways to make the transition from the present methods of dissemination to open access. Flexibility, experimentation, and adaptation to local circumstances are the best ways to assure that progress in diverse settings will be rapid, secure, and long-lived.

The Open Society Institute, the foundation network founded by philanthropist George Soros, is committed to providing initial help and funding to realize this goal. It will use its resources and influence to extend and promote institutional self-archiving, to launch new open-access journals, and to help an open-access journal system become economically self-sustaining. While the Open Society Institute's commitment and resources are substantial, this initiative is very much in need of other organizations to lend their effort and resources.

We invite governments, universities, libraries, journal editors, publishers, foundations, learned societies, professional associations, and individual scholars who share our vision to join us in the task of removing the barriers to open access and building a future in which research and education in every part of the world are that much more free to flourish.

February 14, 2002
Budapest, Hungary

Leslie Chan: Bioline International
Darius Cuplinskas: Director, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Michael Eisen: Public Library of Science
Fred Friend: Director Scholarly Communication, University College London
Yana Genova: Next Page Foundation
Jean-Claude Guédon: University of Montreal
Melissa Hagemann: Program Officer, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Stevan Harnad: Professor of Cognitive Science, University of Southampton, Universite du Quebec a Montreal
Rick Johnson: Director, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC)
Rima Kupryte: Open Society Institute
Manfredi La Manna: Electronic Society for Social Scientists
István Rév: Open Society Institute, Open Society Archives
Monika Segbert: eIFL Project consultant
Sidnei de Souza: Informatics Director at CRIA, Bioline International
Peter Suber: Professor of Philosophy, Earlham College & The Free Online Scholarship Newsletter
Jan Velterop: Publisher, BioMed Central

RETRACTION, WITHDRAWAL, & CORRECTION (R-W-C) POLICY

ARTICLE RETRACTION

JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi, we have a commitment to maintaining the integrity of the academic record, so there are times when there is a need to retract articles. An article would be retracted for the following reasons:

If there are major scientific errors, that will invalidate the article conclusion. An example is when there is evidence that that the findings in the article is unreliable either due to an honest error – a miscalculation or experimental error or as a result of misconduct – data fabrication.
If the research and resulting findings have already been posted elsewhere without appropriate cross-referencing, justification, or permission – the case of a redundant publication.
If there are plagiarism issues – the use of the words used in another publication without giving credit – or inappropriate authorship.

To make sure that retractions are handled to the best practice of publications, and also in accordance with COPE retraction guidelines, JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi make use of the following retraction process:

Any article which requires potential retraction should be brought to the notice of the journal editor.
Once this is done, the journal editor would follow the guidelines according to the COPE flow chat – this includes the evaluations of the answers given by the author of the article t certain questions.
The editor's findings are then sent over to the Ethics Advisory Board before any action can be taken. This step is put in place to ensure a consistent approach to these situations in accordance with the best practices of the industry.
The decision on whether or not the publication is going to be retracted or not is communicated to the author and other relevant bodies such as the Author's institution if necessary.
When all this is concluded, a retraction statement is posted online and then published in the next available issue of the journal – we are going to be giving detailed information on this step as we move on.

Note: if the author retains copyright for an article, this does not qualify them for the right to retract it after publication. The integrity of the public scientific record is important, and COPE's Retraction Guidelines still apply in such cases.

ARTICLE WITHDRAWAL

It is not in the jurisdiction of an author to withdraw a submitted manuscript. This is because referees, editors, and publishers have spent a lot of time editing and processing the submitted manuscript leaving the sudden retraction a waste of valuable resources. Before an author submits a manuscript, through our OJS, the author is required to provide the following checklist:

If the author requests the removal or withdrawal of his/her manuscript when it is still in the peer-reviewing process, there would be a fine of $150 USD per manuscript.
If the author wants to withdraw the article after being accepted for publication, the author would be asked to pay $200 USD per manuscript.
If the article has been published as “Article in Press” – articles which have accepted for publication although not formally coming without the complete package – that has errors, or has violated the Journal publishing ethics guideline as viewed by editors, or has been discovered to be a duplicate to another published article, or maybe it has been Withdrawn from the JGPP website. The author would be fined a total of $250 USD per manuscript. The term "Withdrawn" means that the article's content has been replaced with a PDF of HTML page stating that the article has been withdrawn.
If the author refuses to pay the penalty at any point, the author, alongside any affiliation linked to him/her, would be blacklisted for publication for three years.
If there is a request to withdraw a manuscript by the author, an official letter signed by the corresponding agency leader and the author must be sent to the Principal Editor.

ARTICLE CORRECTION

Issuing a correction is considered by Journal of Governance and Public Policy if the following happens:

A small section of a reliable publication reports flawed data, which misleads due to an honest error.
The Contributor list or Author is incorrect (e.g., a deserving author has been omitted, and likewise, a person who is not worthy of authorship criteria has been included.

Corrections to peer-reviewed content fall into one of these three categories:

Publisher correction (erratum): this helps to notify readers of a major error made by a publishing staff that negatively impacts a publication record or the scientific veracity of the article, or the reputation of the Journal or authors.
Author correction (corrigendum): this also helps to notify a reader of an error made by an author, which negatively impacts the scientific integrity of a publication record or the reputation of the author of the journal.
Addendum: this is where there is an addition to the article by the author to explain inconsistencies and expand the existing work or explain or update the information in the main work.

Deciding whether a correction should be issued is made by the editor of a journal, and this sometimes comes with advice from Reviewers or Editorial Board Members. Handling Editors would contact the Authors of the concerned paper with a clarification request, but the final decision on a correction is required, and if so, which type rests on the editors.

ARTICLE REMOVAL

There might be a need to remove a published article from an online platform in a limited number of cases. This would only occur if an article is defamatory or infringes the legal rights of others, or we have good reason to believe that the publication would cause certain court orders. In such situations, while the metadata of the article will be retained, the text would be will be replaced with another screen, which points out that the article has been removed to prevent any legal complications.

ARTICLE REPLACEMENT

At a point, an author of an original paper may wish to remove or retract the flawed original and replace it with another corrected version. Under these circumstances, the retraction procedure would be followed, with the difference stating that the article retraction notice would contain a link to the – corrected – re-published article alongside the history of the document.

Author Fee

JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi is a journal publication that is not oriented to profit. Therefore, for the publication process, JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi regarding certain costs, namely:

The cost of article submission IDR 0, - (USD 0.-)
Processing Fees for the publication of articles received IDR 2.000.000,- (USD 99.17.-)

Peer Review Process

JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi implements Double-blind Peer Review Process. All submitted manuscripts are read by Editor in Chief of the Mutiara Medika: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan initially for desk evaluation. Unsuitable submitted manuscripts in terms of focus and scope would be rejected promptly without external review. Manuscripts evaluated to be of potential interest to our readership would be assigned to a corresponding section editor for further handling. The section editor will request at least two scientists to review the manuscript. Based on the comments from the reviewers, Section Editor, and Editor in Chief will make the decision on the manuscript.

The duration of the review process in JBTI is 8 to 12 weeks. This review period depends on the board of reviewers. The stages of the review process applied at JBTI are as follows:

Submission of manuscripts is only processed via online i.e OJS of JIWP, website: https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/bti/index
The incoming manuscripts will be checked whether it matches the focus and scope of JBTI. The editor will inform whether the manuscripts are in accordance with JBTI's focus and scope. If appropriate, the next process will be carried out. If not, we will recommend the manuscript to be submitted to another journal. Editor of JBTI will notify immediately via email.
Furthermore, the manuscripts will be checked with Turnitin (similarity check). If more than 20% level of similarity, the manuscripts will be asked to be repaired or rejected by JBTI editor in chief. This decision is entirely the prerogative right of the JBTI editor in chief and cannot be contested.
Then, the manuscripts will be reviewed at the editorial level to find out whether it contributes sufficiently to the development of science and practice in the field of pharmacurtical science. The editor will inform the authors of the results of this review. Manuscripts that qualify at this stage will proceed to the review stage by peer reviewer.
For manuscript that is accepted with revisions (minor or major), it will contain comments from peer reviewers and be returned to the author to be revised. Referring to the policy in JBTI, reviewers only give suggestions on whether the manuscript is accepted or rejected. Meanwhile, the final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of the manuscript is in the hand of the editor and editor-in-chief.
The author is given the time to revise the manuscript no later than one month. Extra time to revise should be asked to editor via email (jbti@umy.university). If there is no notification after the specified period, then the Author is deemed to resign.
Manuscripts that have gone through final revisions and are accepted by the editor will be published in JBTI in the edition determined by the editor in chief.

If the author needs help with the submission process, guidance to use the Open Journal System, or does not get confirmation from JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi for long time, author can contact our journal manager by email in jbti@umy.university to Mr. Nuryakin.

Publication Ethics

Jurnal Bisnis: Teori dan Implikasi (JBTI) merupakan jurnal ilmiah berkala (setahun dua kali). Tujuan utama jurnal ini adalah untuk mendiseminasi artikel ilmiah dalam bidang bisnis, yang memiliki fondasi teori dan implemetatif. Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut, artikel yang dipublikasikan harus berkaitan dengan ilmu manajemen bisnis dan akuntansi keuangan terutama yang terkait dengan praktek bisnis. Redaksi menerima artikel-artikel ilmiah yang belum dipublikasikan, baik dalam bahasa Indonesia maupun bahasa Inggris. ISSN: 2085-7721 (Print) dan ISSN: 2622-0733 (Online).

Pedoman Etika untuk Publikasi Jurnal

Publikasi sebuah artikel di jurnal JBTI ter-review merupakan bangunan penting dalam pengembangan jaringan pengetahuan yang koheren dan diakui. Ini adalah refleksi langsung dari kualitas karya penulis dan lembaga yang mendukung mereka. Artikel-artikel yang ter-review mendukung dan mewujudkan metode ilmiah. Oleh karena itu, penting untuk menyepakati standar perilaku etika yang diharapkan untuk semua pihak yang terlibat dalam tindakan penerbitan: penulis, editor jurnal, mitra bestari, penerbit dan masyarakat.

Magister Manajemen Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta sebagai penerbit jurnal JBTI mengambil tugas memelihara semua tahap penerbitan dengan sangat serius dan kami menyadari etika dan tanggung jawab kami lainnya. Kami berkomitmen untuk memastikan bahwa iklan, cetak ulang atau pendapatan komersial lainnya tidak berdampak atau mempengaruhi keputusan editorial. Selain itu, Magister Manajemen Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta dan Dewan Editorial akan membantu dalam komunikasi dengan jurnal dan/atau penerbit lain, yang mana ini berguna dan diperlukan.

Keputusan Publikasi

Editor JBTI bertanggung jawab untuk memutuskan artikel terkirim mana yang harus diterbitkan. Validasi pekerjaan tersebut dan pentingnya bagi peneliti dan pembaca harus selalu mendorong keputusan tersebut. Para editor dapat dipandu oleh kebijakan dari dewan editor jurnal dan dibatasai oleh ketentuan hukum yang berlaku, seperti pencemaran nama baik, pelanggaran hak cipta dan plagiarisme. Para editor dapat berunding dengan editor lain atau mitra bestari dalam membuat keputusan ini.

Aspek Keadilan

Editor setiap saat mengevaluasi naskah untuk konten intelektual penulis tanpa memandang ras, jenis kelamin, orientasi seksual, keyakinan agama, etnis, kewarganegaraan, atau pandangan politik dari para penulis.

Kerahasiaan

Editor dan setiap staf editorial harus tidak mengungkapkan informasi apapun tentang naskah terkirim kepada orang lain selain penulis, reviewer, calon reviewer, dewan editor lainnya yang sesuai, dan penerbit, yang sesuai.

Pengungkapan dan Konflik Kepentingan

Bahan yang tidak dipublikasikan dalam sebuah naskah yang diajukan tidak boleh digunakan dalam penelitian editor sendiri tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari penulis.

Tugas Reviewer:

Kontribusi untuk Keputusan Editorial

Mitra bestari membantu editor dalam membuat keputusan editorial dan dapat membantu penulis dalam meningkatkan kualitas manuskrip melalui editor.

Kecepatan

Setiap reviewer yang dipilih yang merasa tidak memenuhi syarat atau minat untuk menelaah manuskrip dan atau tidak mempunyai cukup waktu untuk menelaah harus segera memberitahu editor dan undur diri dari proses peninjauan.

Kerahasiaan

Setiap manuskrip diterima untuk di-review harus diperlakukan sebagai dokumen rahasia. Manuskrip harus tidak disebarkan atau didiskusikan dengan orang lain kecuali diizinkan oleh editor.

Standar Objektivitas

Review harus dilakukan secara objektif. Kritik pribadi dari penulis adalah tidak pantas untuk disampaikan. Reviewer harus menyatakan pandangan mereka secara jelas dengan argumen yang mendukung.

Pengakuan Sumber

Reviewer harus mengidentifikasi karya telah terbit yang relevan yang belum dikutip oleh penulis. Pernyataan bahwa observasi, derivasi, atau argumen telah dilaporkan sebelumnya harus disertai dengan kutipan yang relevan. Reviewer juga harus menyatakan ke editor jika ada kesamaan substansial atau tumpang tindih antara naskah yang dipertimbangkan dan setiap artikel lain yang diterbitkan.

Pengungkapan dan Benturan Kepentingan

Informasi atau ide yang diperoleh dalam proses review harus dijaga kerahasiaannya dan tidak digunakan untuk keuntungan pribadi. Reviewer harus menolak naskah di mana mereka memiliki konflik kepentingan akibat kompetisi, kolaborasi, atau hubungan dan koneksi lainnya dengan salah satu penulis, perusahaan, atau lembaga yang berkaitan dengan manuskrip.

Tugas Penulis:

Standar Pelaporan

Penulis laporan penelitian asli harus menyajikan laporan yang akurat dari pekerjaan yang dilakukan serta diskusi objektif dari signifikansi risetnya. Data yang mendasari harus disertakan secara akurat di manuskrip. Sebuah manuskrip harus mengandung detail dan referensi yang cukup untuk mengizinkan orang lain untuk meniru pekerjaan. Laporan penipuan atau pemberian informasi tidak akurat secara sengaja merupakan perilaku yang tidak etis dan tidak dapat diterima.

Akses Data dan Retensi

Penulis diminta untuk memberikan data mentah yang terkait dengan manuskrip untuk editorial, dan harus siap untuk menyediakan akses publik terhadap data tersebut (konsisten dengan jurnal JBTI), jika memungkinkan, dan harus dalam hal apapun untuk menyimpan data tersebut setelah publikasi.

Orisinalitas dan Plagiarisme

Para penulis harus memastikan bahwa mereka telah menulis karya sepenuhnya asli, dan jika penulis telah menggunakan pekerjaan dan atau kata-kata dari orang lain, maka ini telah dikutip dengan tepat.

Publikasi Ganda, Redundan dan Serentak

Seorang penulis tidak boleh mempublikasikan manuskrip yang menjabarkan esensi penelitian yang sama di lebih dari satu jurnal atau publikasi utama. Pengiriman manuskrip yang sama untuk lebih dari satu jurnal bersamaan merupakan perilaku penerbitan tidak etis dan tidak dapat diterima.

Pengakuan Sumber

Pengakuan yang tepat dari karya orang lain harus selalu diberikan. Penulis harus mengutip publikasi yang telah berpengaruh dalam menentukan dari pekerjaan yang dilaporkannya.

Daftar Penulis Manuskrip

Penulis harus dibatasi hanya kepada mereka yang telah membuat kontribusi yang signifikan terhadap konsepsi, desain, pelaksanaan, atau interpretasi penelitian yang dilaporkan. Semua orang yang telah membuat kontribusi yang signifikan harus terdaftar sebagai penulis pembantu. Orang atau pihak lain yang telah berpartisipasi dalam aspek-aspek substantif tertentu dari proyek penelitian, mereka harus diakui atau terdaftar sebagai kontributor. Penulis korespondensi harus memastikan bahwa semua penulis yang sesuai tercantum dalam manuskrip dan tidak ada penulis yang tidak sesuai, dan bahwa semua penulis telah melihat dan menyetujui versi final dari kertas dan telah sepakat untuk pengajuan untuk publikasi.

Bahaya dan Subjek Manusia atau Hewan

Jika pekerjaan melibatkan bahan kimia, prosedur atau peralatan yang memiliki bahaya yang tidak biasa melekat dalam penggunaannya, penulis harus dengan jelas mengidentifikasi ini dalam naskah.

Pengungkapan dan Konflik Kepentingan

Semua penulis harus mengungkapkan dalam naskah mereka setiap konflik kepentingan baik substantif atau keuangan yang mungkin ditafsirkan untuk mempengaruhi hasil atau interpretasi manuskrip mereka. Semua sumber dukungan keuangan untuk proyek tersebut harus diungkapkan.

Kesalahan Mendasar dalam Karya yang Diterbitkan

Ketika penulis menemukan kesalahan atau ketidaktepatan signifikan dalam karya yang diterbitkannya, adalah kewajiban penulis untuk segera memberitahukan editor jurnal atau penerbit dan bekerja sama dengan editor untuk menarik kembali atau memperbaiki manuskrip.

Author Guidelines

Judul Naskah Publikasi Maksimum 12 Kata dlm bhs.Ind atau Inggris

(Center, Times New Roman 12, maks 12 kata Bhs. Ind. or 10 words in English)

First Author*¹, SecondAuthor², Third Author³

¹Institution/affiliation

Email Adress

²Institution/affiliation

Email Adress

³Institution/affiliation

Email Adress

ABSTRACT

Abstrak Maksimal 250 kata berbahasa Indonesia dicetak miring dengan Times New Roman 11 point. Abstrak harus jelas, deskriptif dan harus memberikan gambaran singkat masalah yang diteliti. Abstrak meliputi alasan pemilihan topik atau pentingnya topik penelitian, metode penelitian dan ringkasan hasil. Abstrak harus diakhiri dengan komentar tentang pentingnya hasil atau kesimpulan singkat.

Kata kunci—3-5 kata kunci, Motivasi, Kepuasan, Kinerja Karyawan

A maximum 250 word abstract in English in italics with Times New Roman 11 point. Abstract should be clear, descriptive, and should provide a brief overview of the problem studied. Abstract topics include reasons for the selection or the importance of research topics, research methods and a summary of the results. Abstract should end with a comment about the importance of the results or conclusions brief.

Keywords—3-5 keywords, Motivation, Satisfaction, Job Performance

1. PENDAHULUAN

Dokumen ini adalah template untuk versi Word (doc). Bila anda dapat menggunakan versi dokumen ini sebagai referensi untuk menulis manuscript anda.

Pendahuluan menguraikan latar belakang permasalahan yang diselesaikan, isu-isu yang terkait dengan masalah yg diselesaikan, ulasan penelitan yang pernah dilakukan sebelumnya oleh peneliti lain yg relevan dengan penelitian yang dilakukan.

2. KAJIAN TEORI

Dokumen ini adalah template untuk versi Word (doc). Bila anda dapat menggunakan versi dokumen ini sebagai referensi untuk menulis manuscript anda.

Kajian teori menguraikan tentang teori-teori yang digunakan dalam menunjang penelitian tersebut hingga penyusunan hipotesis dan model penelitian.

3. METODE PENELITIAN

Makalah hendaknya memuat tulisan yang berisi 1. Metode Penelitian (bisa meliputi tempat penelitian, populasi dan sampel, definisi operasional, metode yang dipakai untuk menyelesaikan penelitian. Pada setiap paragraph bisa terdiri dari beberapa subparagraph yang dituliskan dengan penomoran angka arab seperti yang ditunjukkan section berikut ini. Ukuran kertas adalah A4.

4. HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN

Pembahasan terhadap hasil penelitian dan pengujian yang diperoleh disajikan dalam bentuk uraian teoritik, baik secara kualitatif maupun kuantitatif. Hasil percobaan sebaiknya ditampilkan dalam berupa grafik atau pun tabel.

5. KESIMPULAN

Kesimpulan harus mengindikasi secara jelas hasil-hasil yang diperoleh, kelebihan dan kekurangannya, serta kemungkinan pengembangan selanjutnya.

Kesimpulan dapat berupa paragraf, namun sebaiknya berbentuk point-point dengan menggunakan numbering atau bullet.

6. SARAN

Saran-saran untuk untuk penelitian lebih lanjut untuk menutup kekurangan penelitian. Tidak memuat saran-saran diluar untuk penelitian lanjut.

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Komposisi daftar pustaka yang digunakan terdiri dari 80% dari sumber referensi utama (jurnal, prosiding) dan maksimum 20% sumber referensi sekunder (buku teks) yang diterbitkan dalam 10 tahun terakhir. Disarankan untuk menggunakan aplikasi manajemen perpustakaan (Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Reference Manager). Silakan ikuti gaya Harvard (Harvard style). Ini direkomendasikan untuk penulis.

● Buku dengan urutan penulisan: Penulis, tahun, judul buku (harus ditulis miring) volume (jika ada), edisi (jika ada), nama penerbit dan kota penerbit .

Castleman, K. R., 2004, Marketing Processing Business, Vol. 1, Ed.2, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

● Buku Terjemahan dengan urutan penulisan: Penulis asli (nama depan, tengah. (disingkat), belakang. (disingkat)), tahun buku terjemahan, judul bukuterjemahan (harus ditulis miring), volume (jika ada), edisi (jika ada), (diterjemahkan oleh : nama penerjemah), nama penerbit terjemahan dan kota penerbit terjemahan.

Gonzales, R., P. 2004, Digital Marketing, Vol. 1, Ed.2, diterjemahkan oleh Handayani, S., Andri Offset, Yogyakarta.

● Artikel dalam Buku dengan urutan penulisan: Penulis artikel, tahun, judul artikel (harus ditulis miring), nama editor, judul buku (harus ditulis miring), volume (jika ada), edisi (jika ada), nama penerbit dan kota penerbit.

Wyatt, J. C, dan Spiegelhalter, D., 1991, Field Trials of Marketing Decision-Aids: Potential Problems and Solutions, Clayton, P. (ed.): Proc. 15th Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Vol 1, Ed. 2, McGraw Hill Inc, New York.

● Pustaka dalam bentuk artikel dalam majalah ilmiah:

Urutan penulisan: Penulis, tahun, judul artikel, nama majalah (harus ditulis miring sebagai singkatan resminya), nomor, volume dan halaman.

Yusoff, M, Rahman, S.,A., Mutalib, S., and Mohammed, A., 2006, Diagnosing Application Development for Marketing Using Neural Network Technique, Journal of Information Technology, vol 18, hal 152-159.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.
If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.

Copyright Notice

JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Peer Review Process

The duration of the review process in JBTI is 8 to 12 weeks. This review period depends on the board of reviewers. The stages of the review process applied at JBTI are as follows:

Submission of manuscripts is only processed via online i.e OJS of JIWP, website: https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/bti/index
The incoming manuscripts will be checked whether it matches the focus and scope of JBTI. The editor will inform whether the manuscripts are in accordance with JBTI's focus and scope. If appropriate, the next process will be carried out. If not, we will recommend the manuscript to be submitted to another journal. Editor of JBTI will notify immediately via email.
Furthermore, the manuscripts will be checked with Turnitin (similarity check). If more than 20% level of similarity, the manuscripts will be asked to be repaired or rejected by JBTI editor in chief. This decision is entirely the prerogative right of the JBTI editor in chief and cannot be contested.
Then, the manuscripts will be reviewed at the editorial level to find out whether it contributes sufficiently to the development of science and practice in the field of pharmacurtical science. The editor will inform the authors of the results of this review. Manuscripts that qualify at this stage will proceed to the review stage by peer reviewer.
For manuscript that is accepted with revisions (minor or major), it will contain comments from peer reviewers and be returned to the author to be revised. Referring to the policy in JBTI, reviewers only give suggestions on whether the manuscript is accepted or rejected. Meanwhile, the final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of the manuscript is in the hand of the editor and editor-in-chief.
The author is given the time to revise the manuscript no later than one month. Extra time to revise should be asked to editor via email (jbti@umy.university). If there is no notification after the specified period, then the Author is deemed to resign.
Manuscripts that have gone through final revisions and are accepted by the editor will be published in JBTI in the edition determined by the editor in chief.

Author Fee

The cost of article submission IDR 0, - (USD 0.-)
Processing Fees for the publication of articles received IDR 2.000.000,- (USD 99.17.-)

Crossmark Policy

CrossMark, a CrossRef multi-publisher project, offers a standard way to find the definitive edition of a text for readers. Elsevier acknowledges the importance to scholars and librarians of the credibility and completeness of the scholarly record and attaches the highest importance to preserving trust in the authority of its electronic database. By pressing the CrossMark button, the reader will be told of the document's current status and will also include detailed information on the document's publishing history.

Retraction, Withdrawal, Correction, Removal, Replacement (R-W-C-R-R) Policy, click here.

DOI: 10.18196/bti-crossmark

Submissions

Online Submissions

Already have a Username/Password for JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi?
Go to Login

Need a Username/Password?
Go to Registration

Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.

Indexing

Copyright Notice

JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).