Email this article Adjudicating Separation of Powers: Lessons From The European Court of Human Rights for A Future Asian Human Rights Mechanism?
Abstract
Efforts to build a regional human rights mechanism in Asia are being renewed. Separation of powers adjudication will be inevitable if the right of access to court is included in the new mechanism. This is significant since the potential for separation of powers cases involving human rights issues in Asia is high. An Asian human rights mechanism must take this possibility into account, since adjudicating on such issues may severely impact its stability and long-term viability. A mechanism based on existing regional systems such as the ECHR can seek to minimize these risks via institutional solutions. On the other hand, an Asian mechanism can side-step these issues in the short term by focusing on a narrow set of rights, which minimize the potential for raising issues of separation of powers. In the long term, however, a complete charter of fundamental rights cannot ignore separation of powers issues being linked with human rights. The aim of this paper is to highlight both the inevitability and risks of adjudicating cases involving a nexus between separation of powers and human rights by a regional human rights court.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baik, T-U. (2012). Emerging Regional Human Rights Systems in Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bates, Ed. (2010). The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chang, W-C (2010). Strategic judicial responses in politically charged cases: East Asian experiences. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8(4).
Chang, W-C., Thio, L., Tan, K.Y.L. & Yeh, J. (2014). Constitutionalism in Asia: Cases and Materials. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Chen, A (ed.). (2014). Constitutionalism in Asia in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cho, K. (2007). Transitional justice in Korea: Legally coping with past wrongs after democratization. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal,16(3).
Constitution of the Republic of China (Taiwan) 1946, available at: http://english.president.gov.tw/Default.aspx?tabid=434
Constitution of the Republic of Korea 1987, available at: http://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_service/lawView.do?lang=ENG&hseq=1
Constitutional Court of South Korea (KCC), 15 Dec 1995, 95 Hun-Ma 221, May 18 Incident Non-institution of Prosecution Decision Case.
Dressel, B. (2012). The judicialization of politics in Asia: towards a framework of analysis, in: Björn Dressel (ed.). The judicialization of politics in Asia (New York: Routledge.
Economist, “Terms of Imprisonment”, 16.10.2012, http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2012/10/chen-shui-bian
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), 17 Dec. 2002, Case No. 35373/97, A. v. United Kingdom.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), 30 Jan. 2003, Case No. 40877/98 and 45649/99, Cordova v. Italy (no. 1) and (no. 2).
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), 3 Dec. 2009, Case No. 8917/05, Kart v. Turkey.
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), 2 Dec. 2014, Case No. 27759/05 and 41219/07, Urechean and Pavlicenco v. the Republic of Moldova.
Ginsburg, T. (2003). Judicial Review in New Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gold, T. B. (2010). Taiwan in 2009: Eroding Landslide. Asian Survey, 50(1).
Guardian (2009). Taiwan court jails former president for corruption. 11.09, available at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/sep/11/taiwan-jails-former-president-corruption
Hashimoto, H (2004). The Prospects for a Regional Human Rights Mechanism in East Asia. New York: Routledge.
Judicial Yuan (J.Y.), 15 June 2007, Interpretation No. 627, available at: http://jirs.judicial.gov.tw/eng/FINT/FINTQRY01.asp
Klabbers, J. (2015). The EJIL Foreword: The Transformation of International Organizations Law. The European Journal of International Law, 26(1).
Kloth, M. (2010). Immunities and the Right of Access to Court under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights . Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Kosar, David (2012). Policing Separation of Powers: A New Role for the European Court of Human Rights? European Constitutional Law Review, 8(1).
Moellers, C. (2013). The Three Branches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moravcsik, A. (2000). The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization, 54(2).
Park, H-C. (2014). Closing Remarks at the 3rd Congress of the World Conference on Constitutional Justice, available at: http://www.venice.coe.int/WCCJ/Seoul/docs/WCCJ_closing_speech_Park_ENG.pdf
Rafaelli, Rosa., & Sy Sarah, S. (2014). The Immunity of Members of the European Parliament, In-Depth Analysis, European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, Legal Affairs, p. 14, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2014/509981/IPOL_IDA%282014%29509981_EN.pdf
Ramzy, Austin. (2013). Taiwan Debates Medical Parole for Ex-Leader, 21.07, available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/22/world/asia/taiwan-debates-medical-parole-for-ex-leader.html
Rath, C. (2015). Auch Asien soll einen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte bekommen, 04.11, available at: http://www.badische-zeitung.de/ausland-1/auch-asien-soll-einen-gerichtshof-fuer-menschenrechte-bekommen--113306845.html
Stone Sweet, A. (2009). On the Constitutionalisation of the Convention: The European Court of Human Rights as a Constitutional Court. Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 71, available at: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/71
Taipei Times, “Chen’s trial unfair, FAHR mission says”, 17.12.2012, available at: http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2012/12/17/2003550344
UK Conservative Party, “Protecting Human Rights in the UK” (2014), p. 3, available at: https://www.conservatives.com/~/media/files/downloadable%20Files/human_rights.pdf
Un, K., & So, Sokbunthoeun. (2012). Cambodia’s judiciary. Heading for political judicialization?, in: Björn Dressel (ed.). The judicialization of politics in Asia. New York: Routledge.
Venice Commission, “Report on the Scope and Lifting of Parliamentary Immunities” (2014), p. 7, available at: http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD%282014%29011-e
Wang, T. & Chou, I-H.Sandy. (2010). The Emergence of Modern Constitutional Culture in Taiwan. National Taiwan University Law Review, 5(1).
Yeh, J-R. & Chang, W-C. (2011). The Emergence of East Asian Constitutionalism: Features in Comparison. American Journal of Comparative Law,59.
Yu, P.K. (2015). International Governance and Regimes: A Chinese Perspective. New York: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v3i2.12037
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Seokmin Lee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. View My Stats