Email this article 
Malaysian and Indonesian Law and Policy on Rohingya Refugees: A Comparative Review
Abstract
Majority of ASEAN member countries consider themselves to be non-immigrant countries. As a result, the majority of ASEAN countries are not perfect locations for immigrants to settle. However, all states are bound by the non-refoulment principle laid down under Customary International Law in which, the states are prohibited to return the refugee to their original country where there was danger known around them. Hence, in the absence of a formal mechanism produce by the ASEAN region for the protection of refugees, Malaysia and Indonesia perform their efforts and experiences in terms of handling refugees. The paper explains the comparison of how the policy and law on refugees within Malaysia and Indonesia by referring to the case study on the Rohingya people crisis and also the Vietnamese boat people. The qualitative method has been chosen to explain the literature of the paper. This paper also discusses on how both countries respond to the right of a refugee within their sovereignty since they are non-signatory states to the 1951 Refugee Convention. As a result, the paper intends to elaborate on to what extent the laws and policies apply to the refugee according to the Malaysia and Indonesia experiences.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Achmad, Y., Prasetyoningsih, N., & Al Fath, M. R. (2021). ASEAN Non-Intervention Principles: An Alternative Settlement towards Human Rights Violation in Rohingya. Jurnal Media Hukum, 28(1), 118-135.
Ahmad, A. A., Daoud, B. A., & Yusuf, A. S. (2018). ASEAN Attitudes toward Implementation of Human Rights Protection Law at the National Level. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 6(12), 37–46. Downloaded from https://www.questjournals.org/jrhss/papers/vol6-issue12/p2/I06123746.pdf
Ahmad, A., Zulkanain Abdul Rahim, A., & Abd Mohamed, M.H. (2012). The Refugee Crisis in Southeast Asia: The Malaysian Experience. International Journal of Novel Research in Humanity and Social Sciences, 3(6), 80–90. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318653060_The_Refugee_Crisis_in_Southeast_Asia_The_Malaysian_Experience
Ali, M., Briskman, L., & Fiske, L. (2016). Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Indonesia: Problems and Potentials. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal, 8(2).
Arnold, K. (2016). Myanmar's Shame: Living inside Rohingya Ghettos. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/31/asia/myanmar-rohingya-camp/
Burke, A., Lee-koo, K., & McDonald, M. (2014). Humanitrianism (1st ed.). Routledge. http://doi.org/doi:10.4324/9780203071304-7
Chan, A. (2005). The Development of a Muslim Enclave in Arakan (Rakhine) State of Burma (Myanmar). SOAS Bulletin of Burma Research, 3(2), 396–420. Downloaded from https://www.soas.ac.uk/sbbr/editions/file64388.pdf
Davies, S. E. (2006). The Asian Rejection?: International Refugee Law in Asia. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 52(4), 562–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.2006.00433a.x
Gunawan, Y., & Arumbinang, M. H. (2021). Indonesian forced-labour crew in chinese vessel: a human rights perspective. Sociology and Technoscience, 11(2), 115-133.
Khairi, A. (2016). The Dilemma of Rohingya Refugees “Boat People”: The Role of Malaysia, its Neighbors, and ASEAN. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v6-i12/2512
Khairi, A., Askandar, K., & Wahab, A. A. (2018). From Myanmar to Malaysia: Protracted Refugee Situations of Rohingya People. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(3), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17545
Kipgen, N., & Shandilya, D. (11 July 2020). Malaysia's Changing Policy on Rohingya Refugees. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/1949548/malaysias-changing-policy-on-rohingya-refugees
McInnes, C., & Rolls, M. (Eds.). (1994). Post-Cold War Security Issues in the Asia-Pacific Region (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315037394
Milton, A. H., Rahman, M., Hussain, S., Jindal, C., Choudhury, S., Akter, S., Ferdousi, S., Mouly, T. A., Hall, J., & Efird, J. T. (2017). Trapped in Statelessness: Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(8), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080942
Ngainon, A., Redzuan, A., Khamis, M. F., & Jamaluddin, M. F. (2021). Review of Media Coverage on Refugee Crises : The Case of Vietnamese Boat People ( VBP ) in Bidong Island. Journal of Media and Information Warfare, 14(2), 129–138.
Petcharamesree, S. (2016). ASEAN and its approach to forced migration issues. The International Journal of Human Rights, 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1079021
Reporters, FMT. (22 April 2022). End ‘Unfair and Unreasonable’ Treatment of Rohingya. FreeMalaysiaToday. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2022/04/22/end-unfair-and-unreasonable-treatment-of-rohingya-says-najib/
Rogers, B. (2016). Burma: A Nation at the Crossroads. London, UK: Rider. Revised Edition (February 1, 2016).
Sari, D. S., Hidayat, T., & Pratisti, A. (2018). Indonesian Government Policy on Rohingya Refugees. Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS), 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.25077/ajis.7.1.1-13.2018
Selth, A. (2012). Myanmar's Police Forces: Coercion, Continuity, and Change. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 34(1), 53–79. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41446244
Selvakumaran, K. S., Hee, T. F., & Yusoff, J. Z. M. (2022). The Need for A Legal Definition of Stateless Children in Malaysian National Law and Policy: The Perspective from International Human Rights Law. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 13(1), 345-380.
Shacknove, A. E. (1985). Who Is a Refugee? International Refugee Law, 95(2), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092478-7
Smith, M., & Landis, T. (2014). Policies of Persecution Ending Abusive State Policies Against Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar (Issue February). Fortify Rights. Retrieved from https://www.fortifyrights.org/mya-inv-rep-2014-02-25/
Susetyo, H., & Chambers, P. (2020). Repatriation for Rohingya asylum seekers in Indonesia: a durable but almost impossible solution. Asian Affairs(UK), 48(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2020.1833414
The Associated Press. (25 May 2015). Malaysia Finds 139 Suspected Graves in Traffickers Camps. Retrieved from Maclean's: https://www.macleans.ca/politics/worldpolitics/malaysia-says-jungle-camps-used-by-traffickers-contained-139-suspected-graves/
UNHCR, The UN Refugee Agency 2021. Retrieved at https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/
UNHCR. (2012). Global Trends 2012 IN REVIEW.
UNHCR. (4 October 2017). UNHCR Refugee Population Factsheet. The UN Refugee Agency. Retrieved 2 June 2022, from The UN Refugee Agency: https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/myanmar_refugees
Weissbrodt, D., & Hortreiter, I. (1999). The Principle of Non-Refoulement: Article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in Comparison with the Non-Refoulement Provisions of Other International Human Rights Treaties. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, 5, 1–74. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bhrlr/vol5/iss1/1
Wickramasekera, P. (2002). Asian Labour Migration: Issues and Challenges in an Era of Globalization. International Migration Papers, 1–53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v4i2.15819
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Siti Munirah Yusoff, Mohd Afandi Salleh, Md Mahbubul Haque
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.