Implikasi Tumpang Tindihnya Pasal Ujaran Kebencian Pada Tahap Prapenuntutan Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v4i1.17568Keywords:
Hate Speech, Pre-prosecution, Criminal Justice SystemAbstract
The criminal justice system aims to enforce material criminal law and formal criminal law. The parts in a legal system in principle should not be in conflict, conflict, or overlap with each other. However, the offense of expressing hatred is regulated in more than one criminal law legislation (overlapping) so that this has the potential to affect the law enforcement process in the criminal justice system. So it is necessary to know what the implications are in the criminal justice system, especially at the pre-prosecution stage. The research is a normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the overlapping provisions of criminal law regarding hate speech have implications for the stagnation of the case process at the pre-prosecution stage, because of the potential for back and forth case files between investigators and public prosecutors because both of them can have different opinions and stances regarding the hate speech article that will be applied, so as to be detrimental to the suspect's right to obtain legal certainty and the quick and simple judicial process will be neglected.References
Abdussamad, Zamroni. (2009). Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Pembumian Hukum. Jurnal Inovasi, 6 (4).
Ali, Mahrus. (2018). Overcriminalization dalam Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 25 (3).
Bakhri, Syaiful. (2015). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia (Dalam Perspektif Pembaruan, Teori, dan Praktik Peradilan). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Barhamudin. (2020). Kedudukan Kepolisian dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal SOLUSI, 8 (2).
Fahmi. dkk. (2020). Penerapan Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Ujaran Kebencian di Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru. Jurnal Hukum RESPUBLICA, 20 (1).
Febriansyah, Ferry Irawan. dkk. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20 (2).
Hamzah, Andi. (2019). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, M. Yahya. (2014). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hartanto, Cakra Nur Budi. (2017). Fungsi Pra Penuntutan Terhadap Keberhasilan Pelaksanaan Penuntutan Perkara Pidana oleh Penuntut Umum. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12 (4).
Kadri., Husin. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia
Kristian., & Tanuwijaya, Christine. (2015). Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Dengan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Di Indonesia. Jurnal Mimbar Justicia, 1 (2).
Mangantibe, Veisy. (2016). Ujaran Kebencian dalam Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor: SE/6/X/2015 tentang Penanganan Ucapan Kebencian (Hate Speech). Lex Crimen, 5 (1).
Manullang, Nadya Lestari Tua. (2016). Analisis Yuridis tentang Prapenuntutan Dikaitkan dengan Hak Asasi Manusia Tersangka. JOM Fakultas Hukum UNRI, 3 (1).
Muhammad, Rusli. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2011.
Oktiawan, Chandra. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian dalam Media Sosial. Al Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 13 (1).
Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. (1982). Jakarta: Departemen Kehakiman Republik Indonesia.
Prahassacitta, Vidya. (2017). Tumpang Tindih Lingkup dan Ketentuan Pidana Mengenai Ujaran Kebencian di Indonesia. Diakses pada 21 Agustus 2022, https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2017/07/25/tumpang-tindih-lingkup-dan-ketentuan-pidana-mengenai-ujaran-kebencian-di-indonesia/.
Prasetyo, Teguh. (2014). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Remaja, I Nyoman Gede. (2019). Rancangan KUHP Nasional Sebagai Rancangan Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Yang Perlu Dikritisi. Kertha Widjaya Jurnal Hukum, 7 (2).
Rinaldi, Ferdian. (2022). Proses Bekerjanya Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Memberikan Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 21 (2).
Rozi, Raja Mohamad. (2017). Revitalisasi Lembaga Pra Penuntutan Guna Menyokong Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 6 (1).
Sanyoto. (2008). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 8 (3).
Soekanto, Soerjono. (2010). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sulistyanta. (2013). Implikasi Tindak Pidana Di Luar KUHP Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13 (2).
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2008 tentang Penghapusan Diskriminasi Ras dan Etnis
Waskito, Achmad Budi. (2018). Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Perspektif Integrasi. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1 (1).
Winata, Muhammad Reza. (2021). Menggagas Formulasi Badan Regulasi Nasional Sebagai Solusi Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 10 (2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Copyright
Authors retain copyright and grant Indoensian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to remix, adapt and build upon the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and of the initial publication in Indoensian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology.
Authors are permitted to copy and redistribute the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Indoensian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology.
License
Articles published in the Indoensian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology are licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.