The Implementation of Diversion for Child Perpetrator in Magelang

Authors

  • Raihanida Putri Listiaratsany Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Laras Astuti Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v5i2.17637

Keywords:

diversion, children as perpetrator, juvenile criminal justice system

Abstract

The increasingly high and diverse level of child delinquency is motivated by factors that making regulations of Children in Conflict with the Law must develop. One form of its development is the emergence of diversion, regulated in the Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Diversion must be pursued in 3 stages of justice: Investigation Stage, Prosecution Stage, and Examination Stage. The implementation of Diversion also exists in Magelang City. The objective of research is to find out how the implementation of Diversion in Children as Perpetrators in the City of Magelang and to find out the obstacles during the implementation. This research used normative-empirical legal method. The results show that the implementation of Diversion at each stage according to the data in the last 5 years is dominated by successful Diversion in accordance with the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, but it cannot be separated from obstacles that happen. These obstacles are the difficulty of forgiveness from both parties, the existence of an unfavorable relationship between the Victim and the Perpetrator, the compensation request are too high, and parents who do not want to be the guarantor of their child.

References

Aertsen, I, et al. (2011) Restorative Justice and The Active Victim: Exploring the Concept of Empowerment. Journal Temida, 14(1).

Agustiani S, Kristina. (2016) Perwujudan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. De Lega Lata Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1).

Dekaria, Erwinda, and Pudji Astuti. (2020) Faktor Penghambat Diversi bagi Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum di Pengadilan Negeri Blitar. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 7(1).

Fajar, M and Yulianto Ahmad, (2005) Dualisme Penelitian Hukum: Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Faculty of Law Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta Publisher.

Hakim, A. (2016). Analisis Hukum Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Motor (Thesis). Universitas Medan Area, Medan, Indonesia.

Ihsan, K. (2016) Factors Cause of Children Criminal Action (case study of prisons pekanbaru class II B). JOM FISIP 3(2).

Imroatus, S. (2014) Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum dalam Kasus Tindakan Kekerasan di Lembaga pemasyarakatan Anak Kelas IIA Blitar (Thesis). Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia.

Kartono, K. (1986) Patologi Sosial 2; Kenakalan Remaja. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Marlina. (2009) Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia; Pengembangan Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Muhaimin. (2020) Metode Penelitian Hukum. Nusa Tenggara Barat: University Press.

Soetodjo, W. (2010) Hukum Pidana Anak. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Susanto, E. (2021). Kasus Anak di Magelang Sepanjang Tahun 2021 Mayoritas Persetubuhan. Accessed January 15th, 2022 https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-tengah/d-5879178/47-kasus-anak-di-magelang-sepanjang-2021-mayoritas-persetubuhan

Suwarto, Tok. (2020) Selama Pandemi Covid-19 Potensi Kenakalan Anak Meningkat. Accessed May 14th, 2022, https://galamedia.pikiran-rakyat.com/news/pr-35677808/selama-pandemi-covid-19-potensi-kenakalan-anak-meningkat

W Sarwono, Sarlito. (2012) Psikologi Remaja. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Wijayanti, I. dkk. (2021) Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan dengan Pelaku Amak Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012. Pattimura Magister Law Review 1(2).

Downloads

Published

2024-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles