Analisis Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Pasal 45 Ayat (4) Jo. Pasal 27 Ayat (4) UU ITE

Muhammad Al Riyadh, Sigid Suseno, Rully Herdita Ramadhani

Abstract


Law no. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE) regulates criminal acts of extortion and threats in one article formulation, namely Article 45 paragraph (4) jo. Article 27 paragraph (4). These two criminal acts have different qualifications for offenses as formulated in the Criminal Code and are rubber articles so that in their application they cause many victims, as in several decisions, namely Decision Number 111/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Ptk, Decision number 130/Pid. Sus/2018/PN Jkt Utr, and Decision number 777/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Jkt Pst. Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, the new ITE Law, has amended the previous amendment which changed the rubber article formulating the criminal offenses of extortion and threats which were separated into different article formulations. The author uses a normative research model sourced from library materials with a legal and conceptual approach. This research concludes that combining two criminal acts in one article formulation can lead to errors in interpretation or understanding by law enforcers of Article 45 paragraph (4) jo. Article 27 paragraph (4) of the ITE Law is old so there is the potential for human rights violations. This error in application occurs when the provisions for the offense of making complaints against suspects of criminal threats are not enforced


Keywords


ITE Law; Crimes of Extortion and Threats; Criminal Law Policy; Complaint Offense; Human rights

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Arief, B. N. (2002). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Asshidiqie, J. & Safa’at, A. (2012). Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Chazawi, A. (2021). Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Benda, Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).

Effendi, E. (2011). Hukum Pidana Indonesia Suatu Pengantar, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Hamzah, A. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Hamzah, A. (2017). Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

John Kenedi, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) Dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.

Kenedi, J. (2017). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) Dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Lamintang , P. A. F. (1997). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana.

Maskun. (2014). Kejahatan Siber, Jakarta: Kencana.

Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Muhaiman. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram: Mataram University Press.

Prasetyo, T. (2012). Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Prodjodikoro, W. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Prodjodikoro, W. (2012). Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu Di Indonesia, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Rukmini, M. (2007). Aspek Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi (Sebuah Bunga Rampai), Bandung, PT. Alumni.

Rukmini, M. (2007). Perlindungan HAM melalui Asas Praduga Tidak Bersalah dan Asas Persamaan Kedudukan dalam Hukum pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Alumni.

Soekanto, S. & Mamudji, S. (2021). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Soemitro, R. H. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suhariyanto, B. (2013). Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cyber Crime) Urgensi Pengaturan dan Celah Hukumnya, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Suseno, S. (2012). Yurisdiksi Tindak Pidana Siber, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Syamsudin, R. & Aris, I. (2014). Merajut Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.

Wahib, A. & Labib, M. (2005). Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime), Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Jurnal

Alweni, M. K. (2019). Kajian Tindak Pidana Pemerasan berdasarkan Pasal 368 KUHP. Lex Crimen, 8(3).

Gusti, A. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindakan Pengancaman Melalui Media Elektronik Berupa Pesan Singkat. Journal of Law (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum), 7(2).

Nugroho, E. D. & Pujiyono. Sistem Peradilan Pidana dan Jaminan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) terhadap Tersangka Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Belo, 8(1).

Pardiman, D. R. dkk. (2022). Tindak pidana Pengancaman Sebagai Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Kekayaan Menurut Pasal 369 Ayat 1 KUHP. Lex Crimen, 11(4).

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia

Lainnya

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, https://kbbi.web.id/peras

Surat Keputusan Bersama (SKB) Pedoman Kriteria Implementasi UU Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v5i1.19287

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Pusat Kajian Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
E5 Building, 2nd floor, UMY, Jl.Brawijaya, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Yogyakarta 55183
Telp. +62 274 387656 Ext 472, 082230546322 (WA), Fax: 0274 384646
E-Mail: ijclc@umy.ac.id