Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Proses Penetapan Status Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v5i3.24633Keywords:
Proses, penetapan, tersangkaAbstract
Corruption is categorized as an extraordinary crime because it has an extraordinary impact so that its handling must also be carried out in extraordinary ways. The law has given investigators the authority to enforce the law such as determining suspects, detention, and searches. The other side shows how this authority is often misused such as errors in determining suspects, victims of mistaken arrest, law enforcement officials who are caught in corruption and others. This fact makes the professionalism of investigators questionable so that to overcome abuse and arbitrary actions that may occur, a pretrial institution is formed. The problems underlying the pretrial application in this paper refer to the allegation that investigators did not notify or submit a Letter of Commencement of Investigation (SPDP), the determination of suspects had no initial evidence and the calculation of findings of state losses was not based on the results of BPK calculations. The research method used is normative legal research which is sourced from secondary data and analyzed narratively with qualitative descriptive. Based on the research results, it is known that the Praya District Court granted the pretrial motion and determined that the suspect determination letter in the name of the applicant with the number: print-68/n.2.11/fd.1/06/2023 dated June 8, 2023 was invalid and had no binding legal forceReferences
Daftar Pustaka
Buku
Budiono, Kusumohamidjoyo. Teori Hukum Dilema Antara Hukum Dan Kekuasaan. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Yrama Widya, 2019.
Otto Cornelis, Kaligis. Praktik Tebang Pilih Perkara Korupsi. 1st ed. Bandung: Alumni, 2014.
Watch, Indonesia Corruption. “Policy Paper : Hasil Penelitian Penerapan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara Dalam Delik Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” 2014. https://doi.org/https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/45373-ID-penerapan-unsur-merugikan-keuangan-negara-dalam-delik-tindak-pidana-korupsi.pdf.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. Hukum Konsep Dan Metode. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2013.
Jurnal
Harun, Rina Rohayu. “Problems of Criminal APPliCations Law in the Life of Indonesian Communities and Cultures.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 11, no. 1 (2023): 140–55. https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/1144.
Kurnia, Vani, Sahuri Lasmadi, and Elizabeth Siregar. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tugas Dan Kewenangan Jaksa Sebagai Penyidik Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 1, no. 3 (2021): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i3.11084.
Nadilla, Indah, and Elwi Danil. “UNES Journal of Swara Justisia EKSISTENSI PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM SECARA MATERIIL (MATERIELE WEDERRECHTELIJKHEID) DALAM ARTI NEGATIF TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 2023, 133–47. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://swarajustisia.unespadang.ac.id/index.php/UJSJ/indexDOI:https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i1.
Tolanda, Eki, Estes Metelmety, Ragil Sanjaya Marjuki, and Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin. “Kewenangan KPK Dalam Melakukan Penggabungan Perkara TPPU Dengan Predicate Crime Korupsi.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) | 5, no. 1 (2024): 12–18. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v5i1.21441.
Umar, Setiawan Arif; Ma’ruf. “PENERAPAN UNSUR DAPAT MERUGIKAN KEUANGAN NEGARA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah 13, no. 2 (2018): 93–102. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jku.v13i2.1882.
Wahib. “Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Badan Usaha Milik Negara.” Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 1 (2024): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v7i1.43492.
Putusan Pengadilan
Praya, Pengadilan Negeri. Putusan Nomor 3/Pid.Pra/2023/PN.Pya (2023).
Regulasi
UUD 1945 Perubahan disertai Penjelasan secara Lengkap, Palito Media, Jakarta.
Undang–Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
Undang–Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2006 Tentang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan
Undang–Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang–Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 130/PUU-XIII/2015
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 31/PUU-X/2012
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 003/PUU-X/2006
Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fikhan Sahidu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Copyright
Authors retain copyright and grant Indoensian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to remix, adapt and build upon the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and of the initial publication in Indoensian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology.
Authors are permitted to copy and redistribute the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Indoensian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology.
License
Articles published in the Indoensian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology are licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
