Policy Formulation on Criminal Legal Sanctions for Narcotics Crimes: Comparison Studi in Indonesia and Madagascar

Fanirintsoa Aime Andrianantenaina; Dwiki Oktobrian

doi:10.18196/ijclc.v6i1.25437

Authors

Fanirintsoa Aime Andrianantenaina Universitas Jendral Soedirman
Dwiki Oktobrian Universitas Jendral Soedirman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v6i1.25437

Keywords:

Criminal sanctions, Criminal system, Narcotics crimes

Abstract

Narcotics crimes are on the verge of criminal acts that endanger the future of all Indonesian society and also damage education in Madagascar. This research aims to determine the policy for formulating criminal sanctions against drug users in Indonesia and Madagascar and to find out what aspects of punishment need to be prioritized for perpetrators of narcotics crimes on both sides. The author uses research methods with normative juridical legal research. The results of the research show that the effectiveness of law enforcement against criminal acts of abuse and illicit trafficking of narcotics in Indonesia and Madagascar is less effective. This is proven by the relatively short prison sentences handed down to perpetrators of narcotics abuse and distribution. Based on data collection from literature studies and case studies, perpetrators of drug abuse and illicit trafficking in Indonesia and Madagascar have increased from year to year. Efforts to various criminal sanctions objectives such as "Crime Reduction, Crime Suppression, Crime Prevention and Crime Control" have been carried out by the governments of Indonesia and Madagascar, both from the application of criminal sanctions and from the application of criminal sanctions. Law enforcement is already underway. Both by carrying out urine examination activities, counseling and seminars regarding the impacts and dangers of narcotics abuse as well as routine operations and special operations carried out by the police in both countries.

References

Ardika, I Gede Darmawan, I Nyoman Sujana, and I Made Minggu Widyantara, ‘Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Tindak Pidana Narkotika’, Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 1.2 (2020), 287 <https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.1.2569.286-290>

Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Grafindo Press.

CRIMJUST is implemented by UNODC in partnership with INTERPOL and Transparency International. CRIMJUST seeks to enhance law enforcement and judicial strategies beyond interdiction activities and to foster transnational responses along drug trafficking routes targeting each stage of the drug supply chain. This includes the production of knowledge on the cocaine market to support evidence-based policy and strategies designed to counter the cocaine threat.

Friedman, Lawrence M., The Legal System – A Social Science Per-spective, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.1975.

Gatot Supramono, Hukum Narkoba Indonesia, Jakarta, Djambatan, 2004, hlm. 93.

Gukguk, Roni Gunawan Raja., & Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra. (2019). Tindak Pidana Narkotika Sebagai Transnasional Organized Crime. Jurnal Pembangunan HukumIndonesia,Vol.1,(No.3),pp.33 –351. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i3.337-351

Herilanja Hiarenantsoa RATOBIMANANKASINA, Drug addiction among high school students in Toamasina I Madagascar in 2020, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023, 17(01), 450–454

Jonaedi Efendi, Prasetijo Rijadi, (2022). Metode penelitian nermatif dan empiris. Edisi kedua, hlm 283-284.

Julianan, L. & Nengah, S., Narkoba, Psikotropika dan Gangguan Jiwa. Yogyakarta. Nuhamedika, 2013

K. Rinaldi, and R. Tutrianto, "Polemik Pengendalian Sosial, Kejahatan dan Hukuman Mati (Studi Pada Diskursus Pemberlakuan Penghukuman Mati terhadap Pengedar Narkotika di Indonesia)," Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 523-536, Dec. 2023. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i3.%p

Kartika, Arie, Madiasa Ablisar, dan Edy Ikhsan. “Aplikasi Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pelaksanaan Rehabilitasi Pecandu Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Di Rehabilitasi Kementerian Sosial Pamardi Putra ‘Insyaf’ Sumatera Utara).” Usu Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2015): 44–55.

Kusno Adi. 2009. Kebijakan Kriminal dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Narkotika oleh Anak.UMM Press, Malang.

Kusumaatmadja, M. dkk. (2000). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Suatu Pengenalan Pertama Ruang Lingkup Berlakunya Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Alumni.

L'Express De Madagascar, 03/05/2023

LOI n° 97-039 Sur le contrôle des stupéfiants, des substances psychotropes et des précurseurs à Madagascar

Lubis, Mhd. Teguh Syuhada. “Sistem Pemidanaan Bagi Anak Pengedar Narkotika Dengan Hukuman Pelatihan.” EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, vol. 6, no. 1, Maret 2020, hlm.27-36. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.30596/edutech.v6i1.4392.

Marpaung, Ledeng, & Asas, Teori. (2009). Praktek: Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika, Bandung.

Mulyadi, Lilik. (2012). Hukum Pidana Umum Dan Khusus Indonesia Dalam Teori Dan Praktek. Bandung: Alumni.

Noer, Ade Putra, dan Ika Widi Astuti, ‘Implementasi Rehabilitasi Medis Dan Rehabilitasi Sosial Terhadap Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Ditinjau Dari Teori Hukum Pemidanaan’, JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 6.1 (2024), 99–109 https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v6i1.3708

Pakian, Mardenis., & Maryanti, Iin. (2019). Pemberlakuan Hukuman Mati Pada Kejahatan Narkotika Menurut Hukum Ham Internasional Dan Konstitusi Di Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol. 48, (No.3), hlm. 312–18. https://doi: 10.14710/mmh.48.3.2019. 312-318

Putra, Risqi Perdana, dan Pujiyono Pujiyono, ‘Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang Narkotika Yang Akan Datang (Ius Constituendum)’, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4.3 (2022), 365 <https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i3.364-381>

Sanjaya, Yudhy, dkk. “Sosialisasi Bahaya Narkoba Bagi Anak Muda.” Real Coaster: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, vol. 1, no. 1, Agustus 2021, hlm. 17–22. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.53547/rcj.v1i1.103.

Siaran Pers Nomor: 207/HUMAS PMK/XII/2020 Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Pembangunan Manusia dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Sitepu, Rida Ista. “Peninjauan Kembali Batas Usia Minimum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Yang Terlibat Perdagangan Narkotika.” Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, vol.2, no.3, Agustus 2022, hlm. 39–58. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v2i3.90.

Soedjono Dirjosisworo. Hukum Narkotika di Indonesia, Bandung .PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1990.

Soekanto, S & Mamudji, S. (2006). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Sutarto, ‘Penerapan Rehabilitasi Medis Dan Rehabilitasi Sosial Terhadap Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Ditinjau Dari Teori Pemidanaan Relatif’, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2.1 (2021), 115–35 <https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.18>

Table des infractions courantes de Madagascar, Les nouvelles, 26 Mars 2004, n°0028, p.6.

Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1997 Tentang Psikotropika

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika

UNODC research constitutes the key global authority in the field of drugs and crime, providing high-quality, essential evidence to inform policy-making and valuable sources of knowledge in drugs and crime domains, including in the framework of the Sustainable Development Agenda.

UNODC, Global report on Cocain 2023 – Local Dynamis, global challenges (United Nation publications, 20203).

WHO. The world drug problem: the public health angle. 2017