Workplace Dynamics and the Potential for Fraud: A Qualitative Study in the Government Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jati.v8i1.23625Keywords:
Fraud, Government Sector, Work EnvironmentAbstract
This study aims to assess employee perceptions of the work environment in the Bengkulu government sector and its impact on fraud potential, with the aim of developing effective fraud prevention strategies. This study used a qualitative descriptive methodology using semi-structured interviews with government employees in Bengkulu Province. Data were analyzed using content analysis, which offers insight into the nuances of the work environment and its potential relationship to fraud by exploring employees’ subjective experiences and perspectives. The study found that employee perceptions of the work environment in the Bengkulu government sector are related to fraud potential. A conducive work environment and effective internal control are important preventive measures. Factors such as workload, pressure, and leadership behavior significantly shape employee perceptions and influence the likelihood of fraudulent activity. The theoretical implications of this study emphasize the importance of a conducive and ethical work environment in reducing fraud. Practically, these findings highlight the need for policy makers and government administrators to implement stringent internal controls, foster a culture of integrity, and ensure a transparent and merit-based system to minimize fraud and enhance public trust.
References
ACFE. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report to the Nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 1–96.
Ahmad, R. S., Sulaiman, Z., Nik Hussain, N. H., & Mohd Noor, N. (2022). Working Mothers’ Breastfeeding Experience: a Phenomenology Qualitative Approach. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04304-4
Aksa, A. F. (2018). Pencegahan dan deteksi kasus korupsi pada sektor publik dengan. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi (JEBA), 20(04).
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2019). Fraud Examination (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Albugis, febriana F. (2016). Penerapan Sistem Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah dalam Mewujudkan Transparansi Akuntabilitas Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal EMBA, 4(3), 78–89.
Ali, S. (2021). Criminal Minds: Profiling Architects of Financial Crimes. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(2), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2020-0221
Antoni, R., & Enggar Diah, dan F. M. (2021). Factors That Influence Fraud Trends In The Sector Government ( Empire Study At Services In Jambi Province ) Faktor Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Terjadinya Kecendrungan Kecurangan ( Fraud ) Di Sektor Pemerintahan ( Studi Empiris Pada Dinas-Dinas Di Provinsi Jambi. Jambi Accounting Review ( JAR ), 2(April), 1–13.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2018). Report To the Nations 2018 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse.
Christian, N., & Ricardo, P. (2023a). Kajian Impact of Fraud: Nasional dan Internasional. JIMEA: Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, dan Akuntansi), 7(1), 568–581. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v6i2.1978
Christian, N., & Veronica, J. (2022). Dampak Kecurangan Pada Bidang Keuangan Dan Non-Keuangan Terhadap Jenis Fraud Di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Mercu Buana, 8(1), 91–102.
Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological Research as the Phenomenologist Views It. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology (p. 6). Oxford University Press.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. In Patterson Smith. Free Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1140029
Demir, T., Reddick, C. G., & Perlman, B. J. (2023). Ethical Performance in Local Governments: An Empirical Study of Organizational Leadership and Ethics Culture. American Review of Public Administration, 53(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231175653
Dewi, H. R., Mahmudi, M., & Maulana, R. (2021). An analysis on fraud tendency of village government officials. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 25(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol25.iss1.art4
Fatmawati, N. I. (2017, June 21). Kronologi OTT Kasus Suap Gubernur Bengkulu. DetikNews.
Hilal, W., Gadsden, S. A., & Yawney, J. (2022). Financial Fraud: A Review of Anomaly Detection Techniques and Recent Advances. Expert Systems with Applications, 193, 116429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116429
ICW. (2021). Hasil Pemantauan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Semester I Tahun 2021. September.
Jabbar, M. N., Mahmood, W., & Qambar, G. (2020). Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment and Work Environment on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Job Satisfaction. Talent Development & Excellence, 12(2s), 3974–3988. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342343911
Kristiyani, D., & Hamidah. (2020). Model Penerapan Akuntansi Sektor Publik Untuk Mencegah Fraud Pada Sektor Publik Di Era Digital. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 22(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.34208/jba.v22i2.732
Kurniawaty, K., Ramly, M., & Ramlawati. (2019). The Effect of Work Environment, Stress, and Job Satisfaction on Employee Turnover Intention. Management Science Letters, 9(6), 877–886. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.3.001
Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976
Leite, R. A., Gschwandtner, T., Miksch, S., Gstrein, E., & Kuntner, J. (2018). Visual analytics for event detection: Focusing on fraud. Visual Informatics, 2(4), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2018.11.001
Maulidi, A. (2020). Critiques and further directions for fraud studies: Reconstructing misconceptions about developing fraud theories. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-07-2019-0100
Maulidi, A., & Ansell, J. (2020). The Conception of Organisational Fraud: The Need for Rejuvenation of Fraud Theory. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3), 784–796. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2020-0180
Milena, Z. R., Dainora, G., & Alin, S. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods: A Comparison between Focus-Group and In-depth Interview. Research Paper in Economics, 1279–1283.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (40th ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Murphy, P. R., & Free, C. (2016). Broadening the Fraud Triangle: Instrumental Climate and Fraud. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 28(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51083
Nawawi, A., & Salin, A. S. A. P. (2018). Internal Control and Employees’ Occupational Fraud on Expenditure Claims. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(3), 891–906. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-07-2017-0067
Onyango, G. (2021). Whistleblowing behaviours and anti-corruption approaches in public administration in Kenya. Economic and Political Studies, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2020.1800263
Ramadhan, D. F., & Rahman, A. (2022). Implementasi Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah melalui E-Procerement pada Layanan Pengadaan Secara Elektronik Kota Depok. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 5(1), 6–18.
Ratmono, D., & Frendy. (2022). Examining the Fraud Diamond Theory Through Ethical Culture Variables: A Study of Regional Development Banks in Indonesia. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2117161
Said, J., Alam, M. M., Ramli, M., & Rafidi, M. (2017). Integrating ethical values into fraud triangle theory in assessing employee fraud: Evidence from the Malaysian banking industry. Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-2/13
Sanders, C. (2003). Application of Colaizzi’s method: interpretation of an auditable decision trail by a novice researcher. Contemporary Nurse : A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession, 14(3), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.14.3.292
Tirande, D., Nirahua, S. E. M., & Toule, E. R. M. (2022). Kriminologis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Desa. PATTIMURA Legal Journal, 1(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i2.6435
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128
Zhou, S. S., Wei, L. Z., Hua, W., He, X. C., & Chen, J. (2022). A Qualitative Study of Phenomenology of Perspectives of Student Nurses: Experience of Death in Clinical Practice. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00846-w
Zuberi, O., & Mzenzi, S. I. (2019). Analysis of employee and management fraud in Tanzania. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(2), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2018-0012
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jati: Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Agreement and License
In order to be accepted and published by Jati: Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia, author(s) submitting the article manuscript should complete all the review stages. By submitting the manuscript, the author(s) agreed to the following terms:
The copyright of received articles shall be assigned to Jati: Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the rights to publish articles in various forms (including reprints). Jati: Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia maintain the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors are permitted to disseminate published articles by sharing the link/DOI of the article at Jati: Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia. Author are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from Jati: Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal
License
All articles published in Jati: Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC).
