Performance Comparison of HS-TCP and TCP in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Network

Authors

  • Nur Hayati Department of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Mahesa Adhitya Putra Department of electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jet.1106

Keywords:

HMIPv6, TCP, HS-TCP, NS-2.31, QoS

Abstract

Technology information has been growing rapidly in the last few years. HMIPv6 is one of environment used in mobility internet connection. One of transmission used in this method is Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). TCP has a normal connection that connect mobile node to the internet and has a normal speed of transmission. This paper tries to compare TCP with another protocol. High Speed Transmission Control Protocol (HS-TCP) is a transport protocol that introduces new method by improving general algorithm of TCP in reducing time of loss recovery. HS- TCP is compared with TC¬P to see the performance of each protocol. The simulation of these protocols is using Network Simulator 2.31 (NS-2.31). The topology of HMIPv6 concludes 1 Home Agent (HA), 2 Foreign Agent (FA), 1 Mobile Node (MN), 1 Correspondent Node (CN). The performance measurement is processed when MN moved from FA2 to FA1 while communicating with CN. Throughput of HMIPv6 will become the parameters for QoS. The result of the simulation shows that HS-TCP has a better performance than TCP by looking at the throughput which ran on the HMIPv6 topology. This simulation have proved that HS-TCP are suitable to be implemented in neighborhood supporting high speed. With bandwidth at 100 Mbps, we can see that HS- TCP is 32% better than HS-TCP, in 500 Mbps HS-TCP is better at 96% than TCP. In 1Gbps, HS-TCP is better at 85% than TCP and in 10Gbps, HS-TCP is better at 86% than TCP. 

References

H. Bo, C. Shanzhi, J.Xiaoyan, “A Performance Evaluation of IP Mobility Support Protocols”. Second International Conference on MultiMedia and Information Technology, 2010.

Soliman et al, “Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) Mobility Management” Request For Comments: 5380, 2008.

K. Zulkeflee, S. Z. Mohamad, “The Future Enhancements of Mobile IPv6 Micro-Mobility Management”. Second International Conference on Network Applications, Protocols and Services, 2010.

Z. Kusin1, M. S. Zakaria, “Dynamic Load Control Mechanism in Hierarchical MIPv6”, ICEEI, 17-19 July, Bandung, Indonesia, 2011

G. A. Abed, M. I. K. Jumari. “A Comparison and Analysis of Congestion Window for HS-TCP, Full- TCP, and TCP-Linux in Long Term Evolution System Model”. ICOS, 25 - 28 September, Langkawi, Malaysia. 2011.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-31

How to Cite

Hayati, N., & Putra, M. A. (2017). Performance Comparison of HS-TCP and TCP in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Network. Journal of Electrical Technology UMY, 1(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.18196/jet.1106

Issue

Section

Articles