Email this article 
Memahami “Kebenaran” dalam The Act of Killing Melalui Gestur dan Fitur
Abstract
Salah satu cara yang dapat dilakukan oleh penonton untuk menangkap koherensi film sebagai yang terlihat dan yang tergambar adalah dengan membayangkan bahwa, pada saat tertentu, terdapat unsur-unsur yang dapat diidentifikasi dan berfungsi sebagai sarana untuk membaca peristiwa dalam sebuah dokumenter. Unsur-unsur tersebut adalah: (1) gestur; dan (2) fitur. Gestur menempati posisi sebagai salah satu teks petunjuk yang mengindikasikan runtutan peristiwa dalam sebuah film melalui hal-hal yang melekat pada tubuh aktor. Selain gestur, unsur lain yang turut memengaruhi bagaimana petunjuk filmis dapat dibaca oleh penonton adalah dengan adanya fitur. Fitur merupakan elemen artistik yang secara signifikan menunjukkan identitas pelaku (aktor), tempat, waktu, dan hubungannya dengan peristiwa yang terjadi. Dalam The Act of Killing, kebenaran peristiwa dinarasikan melalui adegan performatif Anwar Congo yang sarat akan unsur gestur dan fitur. Penelitian ini menghasilkan temuan bahwa unsur gestur dan fitur dalam The Act of Killingmemberikan petunjuk bagi penonton untuk memahami kebenaran melalui pembacaan terhadapnya.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aufderheide, P., 2007, Documentary Film a Very Short Introduction, New York: Oxford University Press.
Beattie, K., 2004, Documentary Screen Non-Fiction Film and Television, New York: Palgrave.
Bergman, T., 2004, Personal narrative, dialogism, and the performance of “truth” in complaints of a dutiful daughter. Journal of Text and Performance Quarterly Vol. 24, No. 1, January, pp. 3-20.
Bernard, S.C., 2007, Documentary Storytelling, Oxford: Elsevier.
Blumenberg, R.M., 1977, Documentary Films and the Problem of "Truth". Journal of the University Film Association, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 19-22.
Bondebjerg, I., 2014, Documentary and Cognitive Theory: Narrative, Emotion and Memory. Journal of Media and Communication, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp. 13–22.
Bordwell, D., 1985, Narration In The Fiction Film, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
_____________ and R. Burton Palmer (ed), 1989, Historical Poetic of Cinema (The Cinematic Text: Methods and Approaches. Georgia State Literary Studies No. 3, p. 369.
_____________ and Carroll, N., 1996, Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
_____________, 1991, Making Meaning: Iinference And Rhetoric In The Interpretation of Cinema, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bruzzi, S., 2006, New Documentary (2nd edition), New York: Routledge.
Buckland, W., 2004, The Cognitive Semiotics of Film, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, N., 1997, The Essence of Cinema. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the AnalyticTradition, Vol. 89, No. 2/3, The American Philosophical Association Pacific Division Meeting (Mar., 1998), pp. 323-330
__________, 1996, Theorizing The Moving Image, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
__________, 2003, Engaging The Moving Image, New Haven&London: Yale University Press.
Chare, N. and Liz Watkins (2015) Introduction: gesture in film, Journal for Cultural Research, 19:1, 1-5.
David, Marian., 2012, Lehrer on Trustworthiness and Acceptance, Philos Stud (2012) 161:7–15.
De Caro, M. and E. Terrone, 2016, The View From Outside: On A Distinctively Cinematic Achievement, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 2016, Vol. 42(2), pp. 154–170.
Eisenstein, S., 1969, Film Form, San Diego: A Harvest Book.
Ellis, J.C., 1989, The Documentary Idea: A Critical History of English-Language Documentary Film and Video, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hardin, Russell., Trustworthiness, The University of Chicago Press: Ethics, Vol. 107, No. 1 (Oct., 1996), pp. 26-42
Hilderbrand, L., 2009, Introduction Experiment In Documentary: Contradiction, Uncertainty, Change. Millenium Film Journal; Spring; 51; ProQuest Research Library; p. 2.
Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action As Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lehar, S., 2003, The World in Your Head: A Gestalt View of the Mechanism of Conscious Experience, London: Lawrence Elbaum Associates Publisher.
Majalah Tempo edisi 7 Oktober 2012, p. 29 dan p. 113.
McCalman, I. dan Pickering, P. A., (ed), 2010, Historical Reenactment From Realism to the Affective Turn, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
McLane, B.A, 2012, A New History of Documentary Film, New York: Continuum.
McNaughton, C. (2015) Reading The Mass Violence In Indonesia 1965–1966 As A Form Of Primitive Accumulation, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 16:2, 292-305.
McNeill, D. 2016. Why We Gesture: The surprising role of hand movements in communication. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press
Nannicelli, T. and Taberham, P., 2014. Cognitive Media Theory, New York: Routledge.
Nash, K, 2010, Exploring Power And Trust In Documentary: A Study of Tom Zubrycki's Molly and Mobarak. SDF 4 (1) pp. 21–33. Intellect Limited.
Nichols, B., 2001, Introduction to Documentary, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
___________, 2008, Documentary Reenactment and the Fantasmatic Subject. Critical Inquiry, Vol. 35, No. 1 (Autumn), pp. 72-89
Oppenheimer, J. 2012. The Act of Killing. Danish Film Institute.
Otway, F., 2015, The Unreliable Narrator in Documentary. Journal of Film and Video 67, pp. 3–4
Plantinga, C.R., 1997, Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_______________, 2006, Cognitive Theory in Film Studies. College Literature, Vol. 33, No. 1, Cognitive Shakespeare: Criticism and Theory in the Age of Neuroscience (Winter), pp. 215-224.
_______________, 2009, Moving Viewers: American Film and The Spectator’s Experience, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Persson, P., 2003, Understanding Cinema: A Psychological Theory of Moving Imagery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pohlman A (forthcoming, 2014) Women, Sexual Violence and the Indonesian Killings of 1965–1966. London: Routledge.
Renov, M., 1993, Theorizing Documentary, London: Routledge.
Robbins, Blaine G., Probing the Links Between Trustworthiness, Trust, and Emotion: Evidence from Four Survey Experiments, Social Psychology Quarterly 2016, Vol. 79(3) 284–308
Rosenthal, A. (ed), 1988, New Challenge for Documentary: The Voice of Documentary, Berkeley: University of California.
Rotha, P. and Breitrose, H. (ed)., 1974, Documentary Diary. Film Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3 (Spring), pp. 52-54
Ruby, J., 1992. Speaking For, Speaking About, Speaking With, or Speaking Alongside: An Anthropologycal and Documentary Dilemma, Journal of Film and Video, Vol. 44, No. 1/2, International Issues (Spring andSummer), pp. 42-66.
Sanders, W., 2012, The Aggie Will Come First Indeed. A Survey on Documentary Filmmakers Dealing with Participants. New Review of Film and Television Studies. Vol. 10, No. 3, September, pp. 387–408.
Stam, R., et al., 2005, New Vocabularies in Film Semiotics, London: Routlegde.
Wieringa, S. E. (2014) Sexual Politics As A Justification For Mass Murded In The Act of Killing, Critical Asian Studies, 46:1, 195-199
Wijaya, E., To See Die, Again: The Act of Filming and The Act of Killing, Parallax, 2016, Vol. 22, No. 1, 81–95.
Winston, B., 1999, Documentary: How the Myth Was Deconstructed, Wide Angle, Volume 21, Number 2, March, pp. 71-86.
Willis, G., Royston, P., & Bercini, D. 1991. The Use of Verbal Report Methods In The Development And Testing of Survey Questionnaires. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, pp. 251–267.
Wolfe, C. 1997. Historicising The “Voice of God”: The Place of Vocal Narration In Classical Documentary, Film History, Vol. 9, pp. 149-167.
Wright, Stephen., Trust and Trustworthiness, Philosophia (2010) 38:615–627
Zurbuchen, M. S., History, Memory, and the "1965 Incident" in Indonesia, Asian Survey, Vol. 42, No. 4 (July/August 2002), pp. 564-581)
Kroef, J. M. Van Der, How Dead is the Indonesian Communist party?, Communist Affairs, 1967, Vol.5(1), pp.3-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.101008
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Komunikator
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Komunikator Supported by:
Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jl. Lingkar Selatan Yogyakarta 55183 Po Box 1063, telp. (0274) 387656 pesawat 175, fax: (0274) 387646, email: jurnal.komunikator@gmail.com komunikator@umy.ac.id, website: journal.umy.ac.id
Komunikator Incorporates with:
Komunikator is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.