Post-Reform Cinema Public Space on Detik.com News Portal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.14398Keywords:
Film Festivals, News Framing, Online Media, Post-Reform, Public SphereAbstract
Film festivals are public cultural spheres that arose quickly after the fall of the New Order. The rise of film festival activities was covered by the Indonesian mass media, particularly online media. Detik.com is an example of online media that is currently a public reference, including witnessing the development of film festivals in post-reformation Indonesia. The primary goal of this research is to examine the representation of the public sphere in a film festival article written by Detik.com. This study chose an explanatory qualitative approach based on media framing theory. From its inception until 2019, Detik.com was Indonesia’s first news portal, publishing 894 articles on film festivals. The analysis knife employs several major theories, including Public Space (Habermas), Film Festival (De Valck), and news framing (De Vreese). To strengthen the article, the sources cited are also the most comprehensive, consisting of government groups (e.g., Executive and DPR) and non-government groups (filmmakers, festival managers, academics, religious groups, and spectators). When comparing the scale of implementation, national film festivals are mostly covered, namely 28 film festivals and eight film festivals. During the post-reform era, the most news framing film festivals are generic issues (33 festivals) versus 14 festivals that fall into the category of specific issue framing.
References
Arifianto, B., & Junaedi, F. (2014). Distribusi dan Eksibisi Film Alternatif di Yogyakarta, Resistensi atas Praktek Dominasi Film di Indonesia. Jurnal ASPIKOM. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v2i2.61
Batorski, D., & Grzywińska, I. (2018). Three dimensions of the public sphere on Facebook. Information Communication and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281329
Bosma, P. (2015). (Short Cuts) Peter Bosma-Film Programming_ Curating for Cinemas, Festivals, Archives-Wallflower Press (2015).
Calvo, D. & Campos-Domínguez, E. (2016). Participation And Topics Of Discussion Of Spaniards In The Digital Public Sphere. Communication & Society 29(4), 219234
Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (2018). News frames, political cynicism, and media cynicism. The Media, Journalism and Democracy, 546, 223–236. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315189772-14
Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil Society, communication networks, and global governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
Dahlgren, P. (2005). The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160
de La, Poype, A.-L., & Sood, S. (2012). Public Sphere Dialogue in Online Newspapers and Social Spaces: The Nuclear Debate in Post Fukushima France. Public Communication Review. https://doi.org/10.5130/pcr.v2i2.2834
de Valck, Marijke; Kredell, Brendan; Loist, S. (2016). Film Festivals theory, method, practice. In Book.
de Valck, M. (2014). Film festivals, bourdieu, and the economization of culture. In Canadian Journal of Film Studies. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjfs.23.1.74
de Valck, M. (2012). Finding audiences for films: programming in historical perspective. In Coming Soon to a Festival Near You: Programming Film Festivals.
de Luca, K., & Peeples, J. (2002). From public sphere to public screen: Democracy, activism, and the “violence” of Seattle. In Critical Studies in Media Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180216559
Dredge, D., & Whitford, M. (2011). Event tourism governance and the public sphere. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.573074
Durham, F. D. (2007). Framing the state in globalization: The Financial Times’ coverage of the 1997 Thai currency crisis. In Critical Studies in Media Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180701214538
Gimmler, A. (2001). Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 27(4), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145370102700402
Habermas, J. (2019). The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1974). Crime and Media, 3(3), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367809195-3
Habermas, J. (1982). The theory of communicative action: Reason and rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Haezer, E. (2018). Menyoal Internet Sebagai Ruang Publik Dalam Perspektif Habermas. Dakwatuna: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi Islam, 4(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.36835/dakwatuna.v4i2.301
Hernando Rojas (2010), ‘‘Corrective’’ Actions In The Public Sphere: How Perceptions Of Media And Media Effects Shape Political Behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3).
Johnson, P. (2020). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Habermas, 30–49. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203020166-5
Kim, S., Rim, H., & Sung, K. H. (2019). Online engagement of active communicative behaviors and news consumption on Internet portal sites. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919894409
Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Media studies’ fascination with the concept of the public sphere: Critical reflections and emerging debates. Media, Culture and Society, 35(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712464562
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Moscardo, G. (2007). Analyzing the role of festivals and events in regional development. Event Management, 11(1–2), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599508783943255
Mtsweni, E. S., Hörne, T., Poll, J. A. van der, Rosli, M., Tempero, E., Luxton-reilly, A., Sukhoo, A., Barnard, A., M. Eloff, M., A. Van Der Poll, J., Motah, M., Boyatzis, R. E., Kusumasari, T. F., Trilaksono, B. R., Nur Aisha, A., Fitria, -, Moustroufas, E., Stamelos, I., Angelis, L., … Khan, A. I. (2020). Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(1), 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.12.010
Nayman, A. (2010). Film Festival Yearbook 2: Film Festivals and Imagined Communities. Cineaste.
Odorico, S. (2008). Marijke De Valck (2007) Film Festivals: From European Geopolitics to Global Cinephilia . Film-Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.3366/film.2008.0019
Rohde, Marius, Johannessen Øystein, Sæbø Leif & Skiftenes Flak , (2016), “Social Media As Public Sphere: A Stakeholder Perspective”, Transforming Government: People, Process And Policy, 10(2), 212-238
Rüling, C. C., & Strandgaard Pedersen, J. (2010). Film festival research from an organizational studies perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(3), 318–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.06.006
Setiawati, S. (2016). Konsepsi Ruang Urban Yogyakarta dalam Kurasi Festival Film Dokumenter dan Jogja-NETPAC Asian Film Festival 2019, Jurnal Urban, 3(1).
Sobur, A. (2004). Analisis Teks Media: Suatu Pengantar untuk Analisis Wacana. In Analisis Semiotik dan Analisis Framing.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. In Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D.
Suwarto, D. (2017). Penonton Festival Film di Yogyakarta. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI, 14(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v14i1.889
Van Heeren, O. (2020). “Praktik Mediasi Film,” dalam Jiwa Reformasi dan Hantu Masa Lalu: Sinema Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru (penyunting Adrian Jonathan Pasaribu), 36- 115. Jakarta: Komite Film Dewan Kesenian Jakarta.Vreese, Claes H. (2005). News framing. Information Design Journal, 13(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
Vreese, C. (2003). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration. Javnost, 10, 116–118. http://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai:uva.nl:144514
Woodrich, C. (2018). Representing Islam in Indonesian Film Advertising during the Suharto Era (1966–1998) and Reform Era (1998–Present). Komunikator, 10(2), 60-74. doi:https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.101006
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Komunikator as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Authors should sign Copyright Transfer Agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by Komunikator prior the publication. Komunikator strive to ensure that no errors occur in the articles that have been published, both data errors and statements in the article.
Komunikator keep the rights to articles that have been published. Authors are allowed to use their works for any purposes deemed necessary without written permission from Komunikator with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
License
All articles published in Komunikator are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
