The Digital Outrage and Distrust: Cancel Culture Against Indonesia’s State-Owned Enterprise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.v17i1.26412Keywords:
Cancel Culture, Virtual Ethnography, Pertamina, Crisis CommunicationAbstract
Cancel culture is commonly associated with public figures. However, in the era of digital hyperconnectivity, this practice has increasingly targeted state institutions. This study examines how Indonesian netizens construct and mobilize cancel culture in response to a high-profile corruption scandal involving executives of the state-owned oil and gas company, Pertamina. This research is critical for understanding the intersection between crisis communication, public agenda-setting, and digital social control within the context of state-owned enterprises. The study employs a virtual ethnography approach, with data collected through a social listening tool, Brand24, from Instagram and X (formerly Twitter) between February 1st and March 11th, 2025. Findings reveal that the public orchestrated collective pressure using popular words and digital symbols, including emojis and politically charged hashtags. The crisis was widely interpreted as indicative of systemic failure and elite interference. In this case, cancel culture emerged as a form of civic articulation against the lack of transparency, delayed institutional communication, and the erosion of public trust in the state.
References
Abdurrahman, S. (n.d.). Skandal korupsi turunkan reputasi, ekonom desak reformasi menyeluruh di Pertamina. Tempo.Co.
Achmad, N., & Ida, R. (2018). Digital ethnography: Studi budaya media dalam masyarakat jaringan. Airlangga University Press.
Afifi, S., Susilo, M. E., & Yustisia, S. (2018). Social media and the threat of national disintegration in Indonesia. Asian Conference on Media, Communication & Film 2018: Official Conference Proceeding.
Alwasilah, A. C. (2000). Pokoknya kualitatif: Dasar-dasar merancang dan melakukan penelitian kualitatif. Pustaka Jaya.
Ardi, Z., & Putri, S. (2020). The analysis of the social media impact on the millennial generation behavior and social interactions. Southeast Asian Journal of Technology and Science, 1(2), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.29210/81065100
Arianto, A. (2024). Book review: Pragmatics, (Im)Politeness, and Intergroup Communication: A Multi-layered, Discursive Analysis of Cancel Culture by Pilar G. Blitvich. European Journal of Communication, 39(5), 538–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241281164
Bangun, C., & Kumaralalita, N. (2022). Kim Seon Ho, You Are Cancelled: The Collective Understanding of Cancel Culture. Jurnal Komunikatif, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/11. 1-10. 10.33508/jk.v11i1.3785.
Benoit, W. (2021). Image repair in crisis communication. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1593
Blitvich, P. G. (2024). Pragmatics, (Im)Politeness, and Intergroup Communication. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009184373
Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. (2012). Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.cttq9s20
Bouvier, G. (2020a). From ‘echo chambers’ to ‘chaos chambers’: discursive coherence and contradiction in the #MeToo Twitter feed. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1822898
Bouvier, G. (2020b). Racist call-outs and cancel culture on Twitter: The limitations of the platform’s ability to define issues of social justice. Discourse, Context & Media, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100431
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Carroll, C. E. (2016). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Corporate Reputation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483376493
Clark, M. D. (2020). DRAG THEM: A Brief Etymology of So-Called ‘Cancel Culture.’ Communication and the Public, 5(3), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320961562
Cook, C. L., Aashka, P., Meciel, G., & Yvette, W. D. (2021). Whose Agenda is it Anyway: An Exploration of Cancel Culture and Political Affiliation in the United States. SN Social Sciences, 1(9), 237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00241-3
Coombs, W. T. (2007). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting. SAGE Publications.
Deshpande, P., Blatte, S., Margalit, Y., Lezama, C. O., Schaffner, B. F., Shivakumar, A., & Wingens, D. (2024). Critical Race Theory and Asymmetric Mobilization. Polit Behavior, 46, 1677–1699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09889-4
Diether, E., Yi, S., Argyle, L. P., & Busby, E. C. (2024). The Political Psychology of Cancel Culture: Value Framing or Group Identity? Political Research Quarterly, 77(4), 1130–1145. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129241261374
Djamzuri, M. I., & Mulyana, A. P. (2024). Cancel Culture di Era Media Baru: Analisis Komunikasi Atas Implikasi Sosial dalam Kasus Overclaim Skincare. Nuansa Akademik: Jurnal Pembangunan Masyarakat, 9(2), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.47200/jnajpm.v9i2.2621
Driessen, S. (2023). The participatory politics and play of canceling an idol: Exploring how fans negotiate their fandom of a canceled ‘fave.’ Convergence, 30(1), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231199983
Drone-Emprit. (2025). Laporan analisis sentimen publik terhadap Pertamina. https://www.panduga.id/2025/03/01/sentimen-negatif-publik-ke-pertamina
Effendi, A. O. A., & Febriana, P. (2023). Fenomena Cancel Culture Sebagai Kontrol Sosial pada Kasus KDRT Rizky Billar Terhadap Lesti Kejora. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 6(2), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.38194/jurkom.v6i2.713
Farries, E., Kerrigan, P., & Siapera, E. (2024). Introduction to the special issue: The Platformization of Cancel Culture. Television & New Media, 26(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764241277469
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. SAGE Publications.
Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.
Hjarvard, S. (2018). The Logics of the Media and the Mediatized Conditions of Social Interaction. In & J. E.-P. Thimm, M. Anastasiadis (Ed.), Media logic(s) revisited (pp. 63–84). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65756-1_4
Humphreys, L. (2007). Mobile Social Networks and Social Practice: A Case Study of Dodgeball. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00399.x
Jaafar, G. B., & Herna, H. (2024). The Impact of Media in Cancel Culture Phenomenon. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 8(2), 382–390. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v8i2.893
Jaffe, A. (2011). Sociolinguistic diversity in mainstream media. Journal of Language and Politics, 10(4), 562–586. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.10.4.05jaf
Kevin, A. (2023). Analisis Fenomena Cancel Culture dalam Etika “Klik” Manusia di Era Digital Menurut F. Budi Hardiman. SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v2i2.1930
Krisvianti, S., & Triastuti, E. (2020). Facebook group types and posts: Indonesian women free themselves from domestic violence. SEARCH (Malaysia), 12(3), 1–17. http://search.taylors.edu.my/documents/journals/2020-12-3/SEARCH-2020-12-3-J1-1-17.pdf
Kurniawan, T., Ngawan, R., Alno, Y., & Herianto, A. (2022). Cancel Culture and Academic Freedom: A Perspective from Democratic-Deliberative Education Philosophy. Waskita: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai Dan Pembangunan Karakter, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.waskita.2022.006.01.1
Matradewi, N. K. W. (2024). The Phenomenon Of “Cancel Culture” In Indonesia: Between Ethics, Social, And Politics In Digital Space. Socious Journal: Social Science, 1(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62872/x6p8zw03
Mayasari, F. (2022). Etnografi Virtual Fenomena Cancel Culture dan Partisipasi Pengguna Media terhadap Tokoh Publik di Media Sosial. Journal of Communication and Society, 1(01), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.55985/jocs.v1i01.15
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/2747787
Mia, C. (2021). Ideology, Not Affect: What Americans Want from Political Representation. American Journal of Political Science, 65(2), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12571
Nuortimo, K., Harkonen, J., & Breznik, K. (2024). Exploring corporate reputation and crisis communication. Journal of Marketing Analytics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00353-8
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Sage Publications.
Prakoso, A. (2023). Cancel culture: A communication phenomenon in the era of hyperconnectivity (A qualitative analysis of boycotts on Twitter). Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Media Sosial, 5(2), 102–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12928/sylection.v4i1.18792
Putri, V. M., Octavia, I., Nuryanto, H. T., & Nurhajati, L. (2024). Comparison study on cancel culture as an impact and public figure scandal in Indonesia and overseas. Communicare: Journal of Communication Studies, 11(1), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.37535/1010111202410
Rachmawati, F. (2022). Peran Agenda Building Bagi Public Relations. JISPENDIORA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 1(1), 08–18. https://doi.org/10.56910/jispendiora.v1i1.57
Sandi, Z. A., & Triastuti, E. (2020). Fandom as a reward industry in Indonesia: Pleasures in pop music fan engagement and participation within online social networking. SEARCH (Malaysia), 12(2), 73–89. http://search.taylors.edu.my/documents/journals/2020-12-2/SEARCH-2020-12-2-J5-73-89.pdf
Traversa, M., Tian, Y., & Wright, S. (2023). Cancel culture can be collectively validating for groups experiencing harm. Frontiers in Psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181872.
Velasco, J. C. (2020). You are Cancelled: Virtual Collective Consciousness and the Emergence of Cancel Culture as Ideological Purging. Rupkatha Journal, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n5.rioc1s21n2
Veritasia, M. E., & Suteja, R. S. A. (2024). Examining Crisis Communication and Online Activism in Indonesia: A Case Study on 2022 VOTRE PEAU. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi UHO : Jurnal Penelitian Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Informasi, 9(2), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.52423/jikuho.v9i2.217
We Are Social, K. (2024). Digital 2024: Indonesia. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-indonesia
Yanuar, Y. (2024). Viral Pertamax sebabkan mesin mobil rusak, ini penjelasan Pertamina. Tempo.Co. https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/viral-pertamax-sebabkan-mesin-mobil-rusak-ini-penjelasan-pertamina-1175112
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Komunikator

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Komunikator as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Authors should sign Copyright Transfer Agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by Komunikator prior the publication. Komunikator strive to ensure that no errors occur in the articles that have been published, both data errors and statements in the article.
Komunikator keep the rights to articles that have been published. Authors are allowed to use their works for any purposes deemed necessary without written permission from Komunikator with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
License
All articles published in Komunikator are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.