Identity and Communication Pattern of Berco Tribe in Sumbawa Regency concerning Land Conflict Situation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.121037Keywords:
Communication Patterns, Conflict Resolution, Cultural Identity, Indigenous PeopleAbstract
This research aims to analyze the communication process of the Berco tribe in Sumbawa Besar that figured in establishing their reality in agrarian conflict. This study is distinctive and novel since the social science approach, including the pattern of communication, symbol, culture, and identity, was used as the approach. This research used a qualitative study with an over-participants approach, and the informants of the study were chosen using goodness criteria with a purposive sampling technique. In analyzing the data, the author used a model of interactive technique by Miles and Huberman that comprised three steps: data collection, data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The results showed that the Berco tribe held their cultural tradition solidly as a way to show their existence during the conflict. Rapulung, or deliberate instruction communication patterns, became a process that is imposed during the conflict. Furthermore, the use of native language, namely 'Berco,' is one of the cultural identities that is considered important as a form of resistance and becomes the individual variability in influencing the choices and strategies in the conflict situations.
References
Alting, H. (2013). Konflik Penguasaan Tanah di Maluku Utara: Rakyat Versus Penguasa Dan Pengusaha. Journal of Dinamika Hukum, (13) 2, 266-282
Anindita. F. (2015). Masyarakat Adat, Penguasaan Hutan Adat dan Konsesi Pertambangan Masyarakat Adat Cek Bocek Vs Newmont Nusa Tenggara. Working Paper Sajogyo Institute. 2.
Anshori, M. S., Kriyantono, R., & Wulandari, M. P. (2017). Negotiation Intermediaries Dan Identifikasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah Masyarakat Adat Cek Bocek Salesek Reen Sury Di Kabupaten Sumbawa. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 5(3), 481-496.
Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups. The Journal of The Acoustical Society Of America, 22(6), 725-730. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1906679
Brown, C. T., Yelsma, P., & Keller, P. W. (1981). Communication-Conflict Predisposition Development of A Theory And An Instrument. Human Relations, 34(12), 1103-1117.
Brørby, O. A. (2013). The Dynamics of Conflicts Within A Multicultural Organization: A Qualitative Study Of Conflicts That Arise Between Employees And Within Two Departments. Norwegian University of Sciences and Technology (NTNU) Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management Department of Psychology.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Aesthetics and The Practices of Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 256-265. doi: 10.1177/107780040000600208.
Dove, M. R. (2006). Indigenous People and Environmental Politics. Annu. Anthropol., 35, 191-208.
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review, 31-41.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal Social Communication. Psychological Review, 57(5), 271.
Fisher, Aubrey B. (1986). Teori Teori Komunikasi. Bandung: CV. Remadja Karya
Finlay, L. & Ballinger, C. (2006). Going Exploring: The Nature of Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research for Allied Health Professionals: Challenging Choices. England: Whurr Publishers Limited
Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1999). Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation. Ambio, 22 (2/3), 151-156.
Greenaway, K. H., Wright, R. G., Willingham, J., Reynolds, K. J., & Haslam, S. A. (2015). Shared identity is key to effective communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 171-182.
Guba, E. G., Smith, H. J., Marshall. C. (1990). The Paradigm Dialog. California: Sage Publications
Gunawan, J. (2015). Implementasi Permendagri N0 52 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pedoman Pengakuan Dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat (Studi Terhadap Keberadaan Masyarakat Adat Cek Bocek Selesek Reen Suri Di Kabupaten Sumbawa). Master’s Thesis, Fakultas Hukum Unram.
Hinds, P. J., & Mortensen, M. (2005). Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects Of Shared Identity, Shared Context, And Spontaneous Communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290-307.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1980). A Comparative Analysis of Communication Patterns Within Effective Andineffective Decision‐Making Groups. Communications Monographs, 47(4), 312-321. doi: 10.1080/03637758009376040
Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social Identity, Self‐Categorization, And the Communication of Group Norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7-30.
Jeong, A. (2005). A Guide to Analyzing Message–Response Sequences and Group Interaction Patterns In Computer‐Mediated Communication. Distance Education, 26(3), 367-383.
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters (Vol. 7). CUP Archive.
Kim, B. (2001). Social Constructivism: Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Technology. M. Orey. Available online at http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index
Kriyantono, R. (2012). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi: Disertai Contoh Praktis Riset Public Relations, Komunikasi Organisasi, Media Massa Dan Pemasaran. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Kriyantono, R. (2015). Minggu keempat. Etnografi; Deskriptif & Kritis (Powerpoint Slides) terpublikasi, Universitas Brawijaya Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia. Online: http://rachmatkriyantono.lecture.ub.ac.id/
Kurnia, T. (2007). The Struggle Over Land Rights: A Study of Indigenous Property Rights in Indonesia. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington.
Kriyantono, R. (2014). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Li, T. M. (2001). Masyarakat Adat, Difference, and the Limits of Recognition in Indonesia's Forest Zone. Modern Asian Studies, 35(03), 645-676.
Liliweri, A. (2005). Prasangka & Konflik: Komunikasi Lintas Budaya Masyarakat Multikultur. Yogyakarta: PT LKiS Pelangi Aksara.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. California: Sage Publication, Inc.
Mohr, J. & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, And Conflict Resolution Techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135-152. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250150205
Nanang, M., & Inoue, M. (2000). Local Forest Management in Indonesia: A Contradiction Between National Forest Policy And Reality. International Review for Environmental Strategies, 1(1), 175-191.
Owens, Robert, Valesky & Thomas. (2007). Organizational Behavior in Education. Allyn & Bacon.
Rachman, N. F. & Siscawati. M. (2014). Masyarakat Hukum Adat Adalah Bukan Penyandang Hak, Bukan Subjek Hukum, dan Bukan Pemilik Wilayah Adatnya. Wacana Jurnal Transformasi Sosial, 33, 3-23.
Salim, H. S., & Abdullah, I. (2012). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tambang: Studi Kasus Sengketa Antara Masyarakat Samawa Dengan Pt. Newmont Nusa Tenggara. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 24(3), 476-488. doi: 10.22146/jmh.407
Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2015). Group Identity, Social Influence, and Collective Action Online. The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology, John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, 23-46.
Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant Observation. United State of America: Waveland Press.
Spradley, J. P. (2016). The Ethnographic Interview. United State of America: Waveland Press.
Suzuki, S. (1997). Cultural Transmission in International Organizations Impact of Interpersonal Communication Patterns in Intergroup Contexts. Human Communication Research, 24(1), 147-180. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00590.x
Swepston, L. (1990). A New Step in the International Law on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples: ILO Convention No. 169 of 1989. Okla. City UL Rev., 15, 677.
Thorkildsen, A., & Ekman, M. (2013). The Complexity of Becoming: Collaborative Planning and Cultural Heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 3(2), 148-162.
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards A Cognitive Redefinition Of the Social Group. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, 15-40.
Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful Interaction in Web-Based Learning: A Social Constructivist Interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15-25
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Komunikator as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Authors should sign Copyright Transfer Agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by Komunikator prior the publication. Komunikator strive to ensure that no errors occur in the articles that have been published, both data errors and statements in the article.
Komunikator keep the rights to articles that have been published. Authors are allowed to use their works for any purposes deemed necessary without written permission from Komunikator with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
License
All articles published in Komunikator are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
