Policy Formulation of Community-Based Sanitation Programs in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jpk.v3i3.15275Keywords:
Policy Formulation, Community-Based, Sanitation ProgramsAbstract
Cleanliness is an inseparable part that is the obligation of every individual for survival; in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic, stakeholders have prepared policies in the health sector so that people get their right to live healthily. This study intends to evaluate the role of the government in managing sanitation programs during the COVID-19 pandemic, where policies previously needed to formulate solid policies. This research method uses a literature study where data analysis uses relevant secondary data so that it can be analyzed in depth using the concept of the policy implementation process. The results show that in the sanitation program during the COVID-19 pandemic, the government's role in setting agendas must refer to existing problems in the form of community group routines. Furthermore, the government's policy formulation must take a community-based approach that provides insight into the importance of sanitation program involvement and legitimacy. Finally, an evaluation of government policies must make breakthroughs and program initiations in each regional stakeholder by prioritizing innovations that can happen by the Indonesian people.
References
Adams, E. J., Stephenson, L. S., Latham, M. C., & Kinoti, S. N. (1994). Physical activity and growth of Kenyan school children with hookworm, Trichuris trichiura, and Ascaris lumbricoides infections are improved after treatment with albendazole. Journal of Nutrition, 124(8), 1199–1206. https://doi.org/10.1093/JN/124.8.1199
Afifah, T., Nuryetty, M. T., Cahyorini, Musadad, D. A., Schlotheuber, A., Bergen, N., & Johnston, R. (2018). Subnational regional inequality in access to improved drinking water and sanitation in Indonesia: results from the 2015 Indonesian National Socioeconomic Survey (SUSENAS). Global Health Action, 11(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1496972
Booth, A., Purnagunawan, R. M., & Satriawan, E. (2019). Towards a Healthy Indonesia? Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1639509
Cameron, L., Olivia, S., & Shah, M. (2019). Scaling up sanitation: Evidence from an RCT in Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 138, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDEVECO.2018.12.001
Cameron, L., & Shah, M. (2010). Scaling Up Rural Sanitation : Findings from the Impact Evaluation Baseline Survey in Indonesia. Open Knowledge Repository; World Bank, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17271
Caro, F. G. (1971). Issues in the evaluation of social programs. Review of Education Research, 41(2), 87–114.
Clark, R., & Gundry, S. W. (2004). The prominence of health in donor policy for water supply and sanitation: a review. Journal of Water and Health, 2(3), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.2166/WH.2004.0014
Cronk, R., Slaymaker, T., & Bartram, J. (2015). Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 218(8), 694–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEH.2015.03.003
de Silva, I., & Sumarto, S. (2018). Child Malnutrition in Indonesia: Can Education, Sanitation, and Healthcare Augment the Role of Income? Journal of International Development, 30(5), 837–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/JID.3365
Douglas, Tom. (1986). Group Living : The Application of Group Dynamics in Residential Settings. Tavistock Publications.
Galvan, J. L., & Galvan, M. C. (2017). Writing literature reviews : A guide for the student of the social and behavior sciences (7th ed.). Routledge.
Hai, D. P. (2013). Process of public policy formulation in developing countries. Semanticscholar, 1–12.
Hurteau, M., Houle, S., & Mongiat, S. (2009). How Legimate and justified are judgement in program evaluation? Evaluation, 15(3), 307–319.
Kerstens, S. M., Spiller, M., Leusbrock, I., & Zeeman, G. (2016). A new approach to nationwide sanitation planning for developing countries: Case study of Indonesia. Science of The Total Environment, 550, 676–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2016.01.104
Maher, M. (2001). Framing: An Emerging Paradigm or A Phase of Agenda Setting? In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World (pp. 83–94).
Meier, B. M., Kayser, G. L., Amjad, U. Q., & Bartram, J. (2013). Implementing an evolving human right through water and sanitation policy. Water Policy, 15(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.2166/WP.2012.198
Mirzaqon, T. (2018). Studi kepustakaan mengenai landasan teori dan praktik konseling expressive writing. Jurnal BK UNESA, 8(1).
Nakamura, R. T., & Smallwood, F. (1980). Politics of policy implementation. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.amazon.com/Politics-Policy-Implementation-Nakamura-1980-02-01/dp/B01A64ZSW4
Nastiti, A., Primasuri, W. A., Setiani, B., Sudradjat, A., Latifah, I., Roosmini, D., Smits, A. J. M., & Meijerink, S. (2014). Water and Sanitation in Urban Slums: A Case from Bandung Municipality, West Java, Indonesia. The Second International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure and Built Environment - Bandung 19-20 November 2013. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/135242
Nugraha, Moh. F. (2015). Dampak Program Sanitasi Total Berbasis Masyarakat (STBM) Pilar Pertama (di Desa Gucialit Kecamatan Gucialit Kabupaten Lumajang). In Universitas Airlangga Repository. http://www.lib.unair.ac.id
Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), 5.
Pearce, J. A., & Robinson, R. B. (2009). Strategic management : Formulation, implementation, and control. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Pratama, A. B., & Isnanik, A. T. (2018). Evaluasi Berjalan Program Penyediaan Air Minum dan Sanitasi Berbasis Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 15(2), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.31113/JIA.V15I2.148
Ripley, R. B., Franklin, G. A., & Ripley, R. B. (1986). Policy implementation and bureaucracy. Brooks/Cole.
Rofiana, V. (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan Program PAMSIMAS (Penyedian Air Minum Dan Sanitasi Berbasis Masyarakat). The Indonesian Journal of Public Administration (IJPA), 1(2), 81–114. https://doi.org/10.52447/IJPA.V1I2.273
Rosensweig, F., Perez, E., & Robinson, A. (2012). Policy and Sector Reform to Accelerate Access to Improved Rural Sanitation. In Water and sanitation program working paper. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17348
Rossi, P. H., W. Lipsey, M., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. SAGE Publications.
Seppälä, O. T. (2002). Adequate water and sanitation policy reform implementation: the need for systemic approach and stakeholder participation. Water Policy, 4(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00036-3
Sidney, M. S. (2006). Policy formulation: Design and tools. In F. Fischer & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods (p. 672). CRC Press.
Tufo, S. del, & Gaster, L. (2002). Evaluation of the Commission on Poverty, participation, and power. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Turnpenny, J. R., Jordan, A. J., Benson, D., & Rayner, T. (2015). The Tools of Policy Formulation: An Introduction. The Tools of Policy Formulation: Actors, Capacities, Venues and Effects (Issue April, pp. 3–29). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wankhade, K. (2015). Urban sanitation in India: critical shifts in the national policy frame: Environment and Urbanization, 27(2), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247814567058
Whittington, D., Radin, M., & Jeuland, M. (2020). Evidence-based policy analysis? The strange case of the randomized controlled trials of community-led total sanitation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(1), 191–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXREP/GRZ029
Winters, M. S., Karim, A. G., & Martawardaya, B. (2014). Public Service Provision under Conditions of Insufficient Citizen Demand: Insights from the Urban Sanitation Sector in Indonesia. World Development, 60, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2014.03.017
Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan (3rd ed.). Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License
Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Kebijakan (JPK) is licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license. You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
