Politics Innovations Policy: Relations Authority Leadership In The Mobilization Of Support To Build On Innovation Policy



Innovation policy, as long as it's better understood as a question of the ' novelty ' of ' acceptance ' which is characterized by more emphasis on technocracy. Ironically, because of the novelty side more noteworthy, then the sustainability of innovation does not well anticipate, and the ability of innovators to bequeath the institutional innovations are not social interactions social theories are available. This study intends to reveal the problem. Obviously, the emphasis on aspects of technocratic in the discussion of the innovation of the political dimension of innovation not well intention. Examine this can only be done in a descriptive-exploratory with the intent to excavate and interpret objectively illustrates the real conditions against the practices of innovation policy. This study focuses on innovation policy in the field of service permissions in Sragen. Data were taken from interview Governors, bureaucrats, Board members and various parties concerned. Data analysis was performed with two methods at once, that triangulation and interpretive. The study of this download argument that in order for successful policy innovation that is acceptable and continues (internalized) innovators must build relationships – power with various parties. It is recommended to researchers subsequent to review again the form and relation to other models in a variety of bureaucratic innovation that results can provide input to the head area.


Innovation Politics, Technocracy, and The Power Relation

Full Text:



Albert, Mathieu and Suzanne Laberge (2007), The Dissemination and Legitimation Processes of the Innovation System Approach: The Case of the Canadian and Quebec Science and Technology Policy, Source: Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 32, no. 2 (Mar. 2007), pp. 221-249 Published by Sage Publications, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29733981. Accessed: 03/08/2012 20:48

Ann Glynn, Mary., 1996, Innovative Genius: A Framework for Individual and Organizational Intelligence Relating to Innovation, Reviewed work (s): Source: The Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, no. 4 (Oct. 1996), pp. 1081-1111 Published by Academy of Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/ stable/259165. Accessed: 15/05/2012 10:29

Ansell, c., & Gash, a. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543 – 571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Bains, d. (2009). No Title, 2(5), 277 – 281.

Bains, William, | Leadership and innovation. How consensus management blocks genuine Innovation, Editorial published in Bioscience Hypotheses. 2 (5) (2009): 277 – 281.

Blanchard, k. h., Zigarmi, d., & Nelson, r. b. (1993). Situational Leadership ® After 25 Years: A Retrospective. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(1), 21 – 36. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199300100104

Bryson, j. m., & Crosby, b. c. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74, 445 – 456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238.Public

Budiarjo, M. (1984). Various thoughts about power and authority. The Publisher of the Sinar Harapan, 1984-Indonesia-208 pages. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Aneka_pemikiran_tentang_kuasa_dan_wibawa.html?id=TRYkAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

Conger, j. a., Kanungo, r. n., & Kanungo, r. n. (2016). Toward a Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational Settings Published by: Academy of Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258069 Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: Toward a Behavioral Theory of, 12 (4), 637 – 647.

Darmawan, i. (2011). E-Government: A Preliminary Study In Sragen Regency. Proceedings of the national symposium on Autonomous Regions, (1), 69 – 75.

Deiss, k. j. (n.d.). Innovation and Strategy: Risk and Choice in Shaping User-Centered Libraries Strategy and Innovation: Building a Twenty-First-, 53(1), 17 – 32.

Fimm, j. m. (2000). Innovation Strategies in Australian Local Government. AHURI Research Paper, 1-32. Retrieved from http://www.ahuri.edu.au/downloads/publications/occasional_paper_4.pdf

Fisipol University. (n.d.). Seminars & workshops.

Foucault, m. (1971). L'Ordre du discours, 82. Retrieved from http://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/notice.asp?ouvrage=1930468

Foucault, m. (1994). Ethics: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984, Volume 1. The effects of a brief mindfulness intervention on acute pain experience: An examination of individual difference (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Graeff, c. l. (1983). The Situational Leadership Theory: A Critical View. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 285 – 291. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1983.4284738

Henning R (1963) Planning, organizing and Managing Change, Good Governance, Training Board, Luton in the Seminar and Workshop Proceedings, Breakthrough & Innovation management of the public service, the National Forum For the renewal of the Government AreaFisipol Government Science, Department of Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, 28-29 September 2005.

ISO, i. p. (2018). خدمات مشاوره ای در حوزه های مرتبط با مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات Itil, Cobit, Iso 20000 و planning Prince2 شرکت رایزن سامانه گستر, 3 – 5. Retrieved from http://rayzansamaneh.com/

Kumorotomo, w. (2012). The Failure Of The Implementation Of E-Government And Unproductive Activities With The Internet. The Website, (December), 2 – 10. Retrieved from http://kumoro.staff.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/Kegagalan-penerapan-egov.pdf

Lewin, k. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. The Journal of Heredity. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649489

Lewin, K. 1951, Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers. D. Cartwright (Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Lewin, Kurt. 1973. Group Dynamics and Social Change; Source, Patterns, and Consequences by Eva Etzioni Halevy and Amitai Etzioni (eds). New York; Basic Books.

McHoul, a., & Grace, w. (2014). A Foucault Primer. Discourse, power and the subject. Igarss 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

Osborne, s. p., & Brown, k. (2005). Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organizations. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203391129

Prasojo, e., & Kurniawan, t. (2008). The reform of the bureaucracy and Good Governance: the case of Best Practices from several regions in Indonesia. Symposium A Quarterly Journal In Modern Foreign Literatures, 1 – 15. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&cluster=360656420083251686&btnI=1&hl=id

Silvia, c., & Silvia, c. (2018). Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: Concepts for Successful Network Leadership, 43(1), 66 – 71.

Skogen, Kjell, Innovation for Inclusion introduction to the process of change, (http://www.idp-europe.org/indonesia/buku-inklusi/pdf/17-Inovasi_Inklusi.pdf), download January 19, 2010.

Skogen, Kjell. 1997. An Introduction to the Process of Innovation. Chapter II in-DSSI project. Socrates Programme 25234-CP-1-96-NO-ODL (dssi/http://www.uoc.es/), August 2, 2012, 20.00 Hours

Vigoda, e. (2002). From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527 – 540. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00235

Uphoff, Norman. 1986. Institutional Local Development; An Alatical Sourcebook. West Hartford. Kumarian Press.

Zimmer, s. (2015). Innovation Leadership. Research Starters. Retrieved from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?sid=426aa88f-2250-469b-a34b-2e9350bd34b5%40sessionmgr110&vid=8&hid=117&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3D#db=ers&AN=108690514

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2018.0160.161-186

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 39 times
PDF - 12 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Jln. Lingkar Selatan, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul Yogyakarta
Telp: ( 0274) 387656 ext 249
Phone: 62274287656
Fax: 62274387646
Email: jgp@umy.ac.id

Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan is licenced under a Creative Common Attribution 4.0 International Licence