The Urgency of Protecting Netizen in Freedom of Speech on Social Media

Grandis Ayuning Priyanto, Martinus Sardi

Abstract


Freedom of speech is a part of fundamental rights to every people. Nowadays, freedom of speech could not felt widely to all people. Freedom of speech developed until Universal Declaration of Human Rights and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights assure and restrict freedom of speech. In Indonesia, since the rise of The Law of Information and Electronic Transaction, the restriction of freedom of speech become biased, many words in social media are presumably attack others. Netizen feels security to speak up is limited, such Ruslan Buton who critics and record about President Jokowi deemed as a hoax and hate speech. Even though some articles in 1945 Constitution have already protect and guarantee all people to bear the right to speak. The limitations of Freedom of speech in The Law of Information and Electronic Transaction emerge multi interpretation which the right to speak have not been correspond with the values in 1945 Constitution. To harmonize freedom of speech in Indonesia, it needs cooperation among government and people to eradicate ambiguity and fear in which already happen.By using juridical-normative method, the research aims to understand the condition of freedom of speech in Indonesia, and to understand the protection of netizen in using social media

Keywords


Freedom of Speech, Netizen, The Law of Information and Electronic Transaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books:

John Palfrey. (2010). Four Phases of Internet Regulation. Massachusetts, United States of America: Harvard University.

Martinus Sardi. (2014). Menuju Masyarakat Berwawasan Hak Asasi Manusia.Yogyakarta: Center for Religion and Peace Studies.

Mike McConville & Wing Hong Chui. (2012). Research Methods for Law. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press.

Patrick Philips and friends. (2015).Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary 8th Edition, Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press,

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2011). Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji. (2007). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan SIngkat, Jakarta: Rajawali.

Van Kan and J.H. Beekhuis. (1972). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Pembangunan.

Journals:

Ibnu Nadzir, & others. (2019). Hoax and Misinformation in Indonesia: Insights from a Nationwide Survey. ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute. Perspective, 1(92).

Lewandowsky, S, & others. (2012). Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3).

Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh. (2019). Remedies for Human Rights Violations Caused by Climate Change. Climate Law Journal, 9(3).

Philip Eldridge. (2002). Human Rights in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 9(1).

Sheila Kasperek & Bethani Messersmith. (2015) The Library That Cried Wolf: Outcomes of a Banned Book Hoax on Facebook. Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice, 3(1).

Thesis:

Tareq Muhammad Aziz Elven. (2019). Protection of Academic Freedom for Scholars in Indonesia under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Undergraduate Thesis). Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Regulations:

Constitution

The Law Number 11 Year 2008 about Information and Electronic Transaction (ITE’s Law)

The Law Number 1 of 1946 about Criminal Law Regulations

Criminal Code

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Website:

Aji Medan. (2015). Negara Harus Menjamin Kebebasan Berekspresi Sebagai Hak Konstitusional, The Alliance of Independent Journalist. Accessed on 1st November 2019, https://medan.aji.or.id/negara-harus-menjamin-kebebasan-berekspresi-sebagai-hak-konstitusional/

Amnesty International Indonesia. (2020). Peretasan Tempo dan Pandu Riono Serangan Terhadap Kebebasan Berekspresi. Accessed on 4th September 2020, https://www.amnesty.id/peretasan-tempo-dan-pandu-riono-serangan-terhadap-kebebasan-berekspresi/,

Aulia Adam. (2020). Keganjilan Dalam Pembobolan Whatsapp dan Penangkapan Ravio Patra. Accessed on 6th September 2020, https://tirto.id/keganjilan-dalam-pembobolan-whatsapp-dan-penangkapan-ravio-patra-flkF.

Bulletin of Indonesia Internet Service Provider Association (APJII) 68th Edition. (2018) Ikhtiar Percepatan Pemerataan Akses Internet di Tanah Air. Accessed on 7th May 2020, https://apjii.or.id/content/read/104/487/BULETIN-APJII-EDISI-68---Agustus-2020.

Felix Nathaniel. (2019). Hoaks Kian Marak, tapi Kebebasan Berpendapat Lemah di Indonesia. Accessed on 12th May 2020 https://tirto.id/hoaks-kian-marak-tapi-kebebasan-berpendapat-lemah-di-indonesia-elQd.

Frank La Rue. (2011). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, General Assembly, United Nations. Accessed on 25th August 2020, https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/17session/A.HRC.17.27_en.pdf.

Imam Hamdi. (2020).Fakta Kasus Ruslan Buton, Wakil Ketua MPR Kritik Polisi. Accessed on 3rd September, https://metro.tempo.co/read/1354830/fakta-kasus-ruslan-buton-wakil-ketua-mpr-kritik-polisi?page_num=2.

Institute for Criminal Justice Reform. (2012). Putusan PK Prita Mulyasari: Catatan Bersejarah Kehidupan Kebebasan Bereskpresi di Indonesia. Accessed on 12th July 2020, https://icjr.or.id/putusan-pk-prita-mulyasari-catatan-bersejarah-kehidupan-kebebasan-berekspresi-di-indonesia/.

Laily Rahmawati. (2020). Sidang Dakwaan Kasus Hoaks Ruslan Buton Digelar di PN Jaksel. Accesed on 3rd September 2020, https://tirto.id/sidang-dakwaan-kasus-hoaks-ruslan-buton-digelar-di-pn-jaksel-fXA5.

Mela Arnani. (2019). Mereka yang Dilaporkan atas Dugaan Langgar UU ITE Karena Cuitan Soal Wiranto. Accessed on October 14th 2019, https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2019/10/12/160000765/mereka-yang-dilaporkan-atas-dugaan-langgar-uu-ite-karena-cuitan-soal?page=all

Nanda. (2019). Mahfud MD Sebut UU ITE DIundangkan di Era Pemerintahan SBY: Kalau Sudah Tak Perlu, Bisa DIcabut. Accessed on 14th July 2020 https://kaltim.tribunnews.com/2019/02/27/mahfud-md-sebut-uu-ite-diundangkan-di-era-pemerintahan-sby-kalau-sudah-tak-perlu-bisa-dicabut.

SAFEnet Annual Report. (2018). Jalan Terjal Memperjuangkan Hak-Hak Digital. Accessed on 25th August 2020, https://safenet.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Laporan-Tahunan-SAFEnet-2018.pdf.

Safenet voice. (2018). Pengekangan Kebebasan Ekspresi Online di Asia Tenggara. Accessed on 25th August 2020, https://id.safenet.or.id/2018/06/pengekangan-kebebasan-ekspresi-online-di-asia-tenggara/.

Siti Harlina. (2020). Video Hoax Rombongan TKA China Corona Masuk Kendari Diamankan. Accessed on 3rd September 2020, https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4940599/pembuat-video-hoax-rombongan-tka-china-corona-masuk-kendari-diamankan.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Accessed on 18th August 2020, https://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf.

Zabur Karoro. (2019). Blokir Internet Di Papua dan Papua Barat ‘Merugikan Perekonomian Daerah’ dan ‘Memicu Masalah. Accessed on 3rd September 2020, https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-49618624.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v2i1.11480

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Grandis Ayuning Priyanto, Martinus Sardi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Media of Law and Sharia

Office: E5 Building, 2nd Floor, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Adreess : Brawijaya Street, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, DIY, Indonesia

Email: mls@umy.ac.id