Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur terhadap Obyek Fidusia akibat Perjanjian Kredit Sebelumnya

Wihandriati Wihandriati

Abstract


The binding of fiduciary guarantees is expected to provide legal certainty for creditors in carrying out the execution of collateral objects if the debtor defaults. Legal certainty can arise as a result of fiduciary guarantee objects that are registered and have executive power. The problem that often occurs is that the object of fiduciary guarantees has not been removed from fiduciary guarantees after the debtor has paid off his debt on the previous credit binding guarantee. As a result, the object cannot be created as a fiduciary guarantee if a new creditor re-registers the fiduciary guarantee. The purpose of conducting this research is to find out how the legal protection for creditors for fiduciary objects has not been removed from fiduciary guarantee objects in previous credit agreements. In this research, it is normative legal research using data analysis techniques, namely qualitative analysis techniques. The analysis technique uses legal material that is considered relevant to the problem, and is followed by analysis and presentation in descriptive writing. The results of this study are that there are two kinds of legal protection that can be provided, namely preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection.


Keywords


legal protection; fiduciary guarantee; elimination of objects

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ais, Chatamarrasjid. (2005). Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia, Edisi Kedua. Jakarta : Pranadamedia. 65.

Bahsan, M. (2007). Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers. 28.

Hasan, Djuhaendah. (1996). Lembaga Jaminan Kebendaan Bagi Tanah dan Benda Lain Yang Melekat. Bandung : PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. 236.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Perbankan. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika Offset. 107.

M. Hadjon, Philipus. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya : PT Bina Ilmu. 2.

M. Hadjon, Philipus. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-prinsipnya. Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Surabaya : PT Bina Ilmu. 205.

M. Hadjon, Philipus. (2011). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta : Gajah Mada University Press. 10.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung : PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. 54.

Salim. (2004). Perkembangan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta : PT. Rajagrafindo Persada. 55.

Usman, Rachmadi. (2008). Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika. 172.

Usman, Rachmadi . (2011). Hukum Kebendaan. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada. 283.

Widjaja, Gunawan dan Ahmad Yani. (2000). Jaminan Fidusia. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. 1.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v4i1.16832

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Wihandriati Wihandriati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Media of Law and Sharia

Office: E5 Building, 2nd Floor, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Adreess : Brawijaya Street, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, DIY, Indonesia

Email: mls@umy.ac.id