Sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Nasal and Throat of Pre-Clerkship Students to Antibiotics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/mm.200251Keywords:
Sensitivity, Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, AntibioticsAbstract
Background: Cases of nosocomial infection are many caused by the bacteria of S.aureus. Bacteria infection caused by S.aureus may result in various skin and soft tissue infections. The infection may become difficult to treat if the strain of S.aureus responsible is the methicillin resistant strain or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Currently there are two known types of MRSA: Hospital Acquired MRSA/HA-MRSA and Community Acquired MRSA/CA-MRSA. Transmission of the bacteria from one patient to another may be caused by unsterile medical equipment or from the hospital staff, especially pre-clinical students who will work in a hospital. The purpose of this study was to obtained the difference of bacteria colonisations S.aureus from nasal and throat swabs, and the sensitivity patterns of S.aureus when exposed to antibiotics (methicillin, vancomycin, imipenem, penicillin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin) and the prevalence of MRSA carriers and also to obtain an understanding of the characteristics of medical drug use through Islamic views. Metodes: This study used descriptive analysis method with samples taken from nasal and throat swabs applied to healthy pre-clinic student from Universitas YARSI. Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney test in the program SPSS for windows. Results: The results bacteria colonisations S.aureus from nasal swabs was positive (23,3%), while from the throat sample was positive (10%). The results of statistical analysis (Sig. = 0.051 > 0.05) shows that there is no significant difference between the bacterial colonies of S.aureus originating from the nasal swabs and throat swabs of the pre-clinical students. From 60 samples a positive prevalence of (1.7%) was obtained for MRSA carriers. The result of the sensitivity test shows that the isolated sample of the bacteria S.aureus shows the highest sensitivity to the antibiotic imipenem and almost all the isolated samples show resistance to the antibiotic penicillin. Conclusion: There are more S.aureus bacteria colonies on nasal swabs compared to throat swabs. There was no significant difference between S.aureus bacteria colonization of nose and throat swabs in pre-clinical-students. The positive prevalence of MRSA carrier among pre-clinical-students of Yarsi University was (1.7%). In nasal swabs all isolates were still sensitive to the antibiotics methicillin, imipenem, ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. But on the nasal swab there were three VISA isolates. In the throat swab, there was one MRSA isolate and one isolate that was resistant to ofloxacin. The inhibition zone of the highest sensitivity was obtained for imipenem antibiotics. Almost all isolates showed resistance to penicillin antibiotics. In Islamic medicine, drugs or antibiotics must not contain unclean and haram objects for human consumption.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors retain copyright and grant Mutiara Medika: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan (MMJKK) the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to remix, adapt and build upon the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and of the initial publication in Mutiara Medika: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan (MMJKK).
Authors are permitted to copy and redistribute the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Mutiara Medika: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan (MMJKK).
License
Articles published in the Mutiara Medika: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan (MMJKK) are licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.