Predisposisi Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perencanaan Kampung Wisata (Studi Kasus Kampung Wisata Santan)

Sutrisno Sutrisno

Abstract


This study aimed to analyze predisposition (readiness), especially understanding and attitudes towards the tourist village program and to analyze community participation in the declaration and plan of participation in the program tourist village. The experiment was conducted in the village (Kampung) Santan Village Guwosari, Pajangan Bantul. Respondents are determined by the census. The results showed general cognitive understanding people's understanding of the tourist village, the knowledge of the planning and launching of Kampung Dusun Santan as Tourism is still largely lacking (only know a little bit). This is due to the constraints of socialization and domination of the village leaders in planning the tourist village less evenly involve villagers. Once people get the socialization though still very limited, affective response was very positive and support the tourist village. They hoped that Kampung Santan be more advanced and increased economy. Public participation in the tourist village program showed improved symptoms, ranging from participation since the planning, at the time of the declaration and the time after the launching. Forms of participation can be seen from the amount of involvement of communities themselves and plan the most desirable programs. Tourism Village program were most interested in the community is the provision of infrastructure, because the program is expected to bring direct benefits to the community. It is recommended that the socialization and solidarity of citizens needs to be improved so that participation can be improved.

Keywords


predisposition; response; participation; tourist village

Full Text:

PDF

References


Awang, S.A.; H. Santoso; W.T. Widayati; Y. Nugroho; Kustomo; Sapardiono. 2001. Gurat hutan rakyat di kapur selatan. Yogyakarta: Debut Press.

Blackstock, K. 2005. A critical look at community base tourism. Community Development Journal 40(1): 39 – 49.

Echtner, C. M. 2002. The content of the third world tourism marketing: a 4A Approach. International Journal of Tourism Research 4: 413-434.

Damanik, J. & H. F. Weber. 2006. Perencanaan Kampung Wisata: Dari Teori ke Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Pariwisata dan Penerbit Andi.

Gartner, W. C. 2004. Rural tourism development in the USA. International Journal of Tourism Research 6: 151 – 164.

Lansing, P., and P. De Vries. 2007. Sustainable tourism: ethical alternative or marketing ploy?. Journal of Business Ethics 72:77-85.

Nugroho, I. (2011). Ekowisata dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Pike, S. 2005. Tourism destination branding complexity. The Journal of Product and Brand Management 14(4): 258 – 259.

Pinel, D. P. 1998. Create A Good Fit: A Community-Based Tourism Planning Model. Pinel & Association Research & Planning, Canada.

Santosa, S. P. 2002. Pengembangan Pariwisata Indonesia. www.google.com. Diunduh pada tanggal 20 Mei 2009.

Simon, H. 1999. Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Rakyat (Cooperative Forest Management). Teori dan Aplikasi pada Hutan Jati di Jawa. Yogyakarta: Bigraf Publishing.

Welford, R. dan B. Ytterhus. 2004. Suistainable development and tourism destination management: A case study of the Lillahammer region, Norwey. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 11:410 – 422.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/agr.2124

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Indexed By:

     


Office Address:
Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Ground Floor of F3 Building (Siti Walidah)
Jl. Brawijaya, Tamantiro, Kasihan, Bantul. 55183
Telp.: +62 274 387656, Ext.: 201
HP or WhatsApp: +62 85328737828
Email: agraris@umy.ac.id

AGRARIS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0  (CC BY-SA 4.0) International License.