Demoralization of Government Bureaucratic Corruption in East Kutai District Head Ismunandar

Rita Kalalinggi

Abstract


This study uses the literature review method through journals and supporting reports that are related to this study and explained descriptively through data obtained from journals or reports. The findings generated in this study are corruption cases involving regional heads in East Kutai and their ranks are inseparable from the existence of oligarchic politics, all of these cannot be separated from the compatibility of a project. Cases like this are rife in bureaucratic and political elites who sometimes use family connection mechanisms. According to records from the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) from 2015 to 2018 in terms of cases and the number of suspects continues to increase. In 2018, the KPK handled 57 cases with 261 suspects and a total loss of Rp385 billion. Where the average cases handled by the KPK per month are five cases with an estimated value of Rp6.6 billion. Corruption acts carried out by the KPK mostly function as chairmen or members of the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) with a total of 103 suspects. Acts of corruption are often carried out by political elites in the DPR as well as in law enforcement agencies. However, the most vulnerable to corruption is the village. the most vulnerable sector in 2018 is the village budget. There were 96 cases of corruption related to the village budget involving 133 suspects with state losses of Rp. 37.2 billion. Meanwhile, the sector that caused the highest state loss was the banking sector amounting to Rp2,100 billion (16 cases). 


Keywords


Bureaucracy; Demoralization; Corruption; East Kutai District

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anggraeni, T. D. (2014). Menciptakan Sistem Pelayanan Publik yang Baik: Strategi Reformasi Birokrasi dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi. Rechts Vinding, 3(3), 417–433.

Aspinall, E. (2015). The Surprising Democratic Behemoth: Indonesia in Comparative Asian Perspective. The Journal of Asian Studies, 74(4), 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911815001138

Badjuri, A. (2011). Peranan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) sebagai lembaga anti korupsi di indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi (JBE), 18(Maret 2011), 84–96.

Baswir, R. (2002). Dinamika Korupsi di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Struktural. Jurnal Universitas Paramadina, 2(1), 25–34.

Ford, M., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2014). Beyond Oligarchy: Wealth, Power and Contemporary Indonesian Politics. Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications, 180, 4.

Hadiz, V. R. (2004). The rise of neo-Third Worldism? The Indonesian trajectory and the consolidation of illiberal democracy. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000185336

Lay, C. (2012). Democratic Transition in Local Indonesia: An Overview of Ten Years Democracy. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 15, 13.

Nugroho, H. (2013). Efektivitas Fungsi Koordinasi dan Supervisi dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol. 13 No. 3 September 2013, 13(3), 392–401.

Pratama, P. Y., Budiman, B., & Sarmiasih, M. (2019). A Comparative Political Analysis Between The New Order Regime And The Reformed Era In Indonesia: A Case Study Of Oligarchy Politics In The Mining Industry Of East Kalimantan. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 10(3), 194-207.

Rahman, F. (2011). Korupsi Di Tingkat Desa Pendahuluan Setiap negara pasti terdapat korupsi. Korupsi paling banyak dijumpai pusat. Tetapi kasus korupsi yang dilaporkan limabelas kali lipat dan jumlah empiris betapa perilaku korupsi semakin massif dan tak terkendali. 3 Te. Governance, 13–14.

Slater, D., & Simmons, E. (2010). Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics. Comparative Political Studies, 43(7), 886–917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010361343

Suherry, S. (2017). Politik Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 7(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v7i1.417

Tahir, A., Bachri, S., Ruslan, A., & Abdullah, F. (2015). The Local Election and Local Politic in Emboding the Democracy. 9.

Wakhid, A. A. (2011). Eksistensi Konsep Birokrasi Max Weber Dalam Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Tapis, 7(13), 127–146.

Winters, J. A. (2013). Oligarchy and Democracy in Indonesia. Southeast Asia Program Publications at Cornell University, 96(Wealth, Power, and Contemporary Indonesian Politics), 11–33.

Website: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2020/02/19/ragam-modus-korupsi-sepanjang2019 https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2020/02/19/10-lembaga-dengan-temuan-kasuskorupsi-terbanyak https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2020/10/09/114-kepala-daerah-terjeratkorupsi-sejak-2004-2019 https://nasional.okezone.com/read/2020/07/05/337/2241363/kasus-korupsi-kutai-timurungkap-family-connection-antara-para-tersangka. https://mediaindonesia.com/read/detail/325271-gubernur-isran-jangan-ada-lagi-kasus-ott-dikaltim https://jatimtimes.com/baca/217872/20200703/081800/kpk-ott-di-kaltim-bupati-kutaitimur-ditangkap-hingga-rumah-disegel




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.73134

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Office: 
Master of Government Affairs and Administration (MIP)
Postgraduate Building 2nd Floor UMY

Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 173)

Jl. Brawijaya, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.