Email this article Aceh’s Local Elite Power Strategy
Abstract
This paper aims to see how the strategy of local elites in gaining power in village government in Aceh. In this case, Acehnese local elites, former members of the Free Aceh Movement (GAM), have economic and political advantages over other communities because they have networks within the Free Aceh Movement organization down to the grassroots. The qualitative method with the case study approach was used in this research. The findings of this study revealed that local Acehnese elites used the connections of fellow GAM members in the government as a strategy to seize economic and political resources in the village. They contested in the village head election (keuchik) and competed to become village government officials after knowing the number of village funds managed by the village through general elections and even through direct appointment as interim village head officials. This study concludes with four main strategies for gaining power in government in the village. The main strategies are (1) successful team consolidation, (2) segmentation, targeting, and positioning, (3) candidate image, and (4) Aceh's contextual strategy in the form of a network of the former Free Aceh Movement in gaining political power at the village level in Aceh.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbar, M. F., & Mohi, W. K. (2017). Peran Pemerintah Desa dalam Menunjang Pendapatn Masyarakat Petani Jagung di Desa Dulohupa Keccamatan Boliyohuto Kabupaten Gorontalo. CosmoGov, 3(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v3i2.14727
Argenti, G. (2018). Civil Society, Shadow State dan Local Strongmen dalam Kajian Politik Lokal. CosmoGov, 4(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v4i1.14737
Asmorowati and Marcus. (2006). Urban Poverty and the Rural Development Bias: Some Notes from Indonesia. Journal of Developing Societies, 22(2), 145–168.
Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2000). Capture and Governance at Local and National Levels. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 135–39.
Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2002). Relative Capture of Local and Central Governments: AnEssay in the Political Economy of Decentralisation (No. 99). Boston.
Baron, D. P. (1994). Electoral Competition with Informed and Uninformed Voters. American Political Science Review, 88(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944880
Bottomore, T. (2006). Elite dan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Akbar Tandjung Institute.
BPS. (2018). Persentase Penduduk Miskin Pada September. Jakarta.
Budiardjo, M. (1984). Aneka Pemikiran tentang Kuasa dan Wibawa. Jakarta: Penerbit Sinar Harapan.
Dahl, R. (1978). Modern Political Analysis. India: Prentice-Hall of India.
Fritzen, S. (2007). Can the Design of Community-driven Development Reduce the Risk of Elite Capture? Evidence from Indonesia. World Development, 35(8), 1359–1375.
Gibson and Lehoucq. (2006). Municipal Politics and Forest Governance: Comparative Analysis of Decentralization in Bolivia and Guatemala. World Development, 34(3), 576–595.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1996). Electoral Competition and Special Interest Politics. The Review of Economic Studies, 63(2), 265—286.
Hadiz, V. R. (2005). Dinamika Kekuasaan Indonesia Ekonomi Politik Indonesia Pasca Soeharto. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Hajad, V., & Ikhsan, I. (2019). Peran Mantan Kombatan GAM dalam Sektor Ekonomi Pasca Konflik. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 7(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpp.v7i1.7985
Hickey, S. and M. (2004). Participation from Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. London: Zed.
Idrus, I. A., & Purwaningsih, T. (2016). Peran Elit Lokal Dalam Kemenangan Partai Gerindra Pada Pemilihan Umum Legislatif Tahun 2014 Di Kabupaten Luwu Utara. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 3(2), 282–303. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.2016.0060
Kartodirjo, S. (1981). Elit dalam Perspektif Sejarah. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Keller, S. (1995). Penguasa dan Kelompok Elite: Peranan Elite–penentu dalam Masyarakat Modern. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1991). The Politics of Government Decision-Making: A Theory of Regulatory Capture. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1089—1127.
Lieten, G. K. (1996). Development, Devolution and Democracy: Village Discourse in West Bengal. New Delhi: Sage Pub.
Marijan, K. (2010). Sistem Politik Indonesia Konsolidasi Demokrasi Pasca Orde Baru. Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media Group.
Mas’oed, M. (2006). Perbandingan Sistem Politik. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Masaki, K. (2007). Power, Participation and Policy. The Emancipatory Evolution of the Elite-Controlled Policy Process. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
Maschab, M. (2013). Politik Pemerintahan Desa di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Polgov.
Mills, C. W. (1956). The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nugroho, H. S. (2018). Menalar Posisi Elit Daerah di Era Demokrasi dan Otonomi Daerah. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v3i1.1989
Nurfaisal, M. D. (2019). Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa dalam Pembangunan Insfrastruktur di Desa Tegalrejo Kecamatan Gedangsari Kabupaten Gunung Kidul Tahun 2016. CosmoGov, 5(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v5i1.18432
Platteau. (2004). Monitoring Elite Capture in Community-driven Development. Development and Change, 35(2), 223–246.
Rohmah, N. S. (2018). Elit dan Pemekaran Daerah; Konflik Antar Elit dalam Proses Pemebentukan Provinsi Banten. CosmoGov, 4(2), 173.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v9i2.12930
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Governance and Public Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Office:
Master of Government Affairs and Administration (MIP)
Postgraduate Building 2nd Floor UMY
Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 173)
Jl. Brawijaya, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.