Formulating Integrated Public Services in Batu City: A Preliminary Study

Dedik F Suhermanto, Ali Roziqin, Iradhad T Sihidi, Temmy Indrawan, Yusrin Rahmawati

Abstract


This study aims to develop an initial framework for integrating public services in Batu City. The integration of public services in Batu City is formulated into the Integrated Public Service (Public Service Mall). This research is preliminary, meaning that researchers wanted to identify potential public services developed in Batu City. Furthermore, the discussion of the initial framework focused on three aspects, namely institutional, management, and human resource management. This research used a mixed-methods approach. Furthermore, data collection was carried out through questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and literature studies. The results uncovered that the integration of public services in Batu City has the potential to be developed through Public Service Mall. The strategic placement of Public Service Mall locations is also needed to provide affordability for the community. Public Service Mall can also expand the types of services from 118-130 to 130-140. From an institutional perspective, Public Service Mall remains under the Batu City One-Stop Integrated Service and Investment Service (DPMPTSP) supervision by coordinating with technical agencies from the public and private sectors. Then, in terms of management, the implementation of the Public Service Mall requires physical and network infrastructure in the service process. Finally, the HRM (Human Resource Management) aspect needs to pay attention to the competency skills of the apparatus, both as implementers and control systems.

Keywords


Public Services; Bureaucracy; Batu City

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adawiyah, P. R. (2018). Inovasi Dalam Pelayanan Publik Di Mall Pelayanan Publik Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Politico, 18(2), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.32528/politico.v18i2.1659

Amann, J., & Sleigh, J. (2021). Too Vulnerable to Involve? Challenges of Engaging Vulnerable Groups in the Co-production of Public Services through Research. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1912089

Anu, P. (2015). Integrated Public Service Delivery in Agile e-Government System through Service Oriented Enterprise Model in the Context of India. Electronic Government and Electronic Participation: Joint Proceedings of Ongoing Research and Projects of IFIP WG 8.5 EGOV and EPart 2015, December, 295–302. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-570-8-295

Apriliyanti, I. D., Kusumasari, B., Pramusinto, A., & Setianto, W. A. (2020). Digital divide in ASEAN member states: analyzing the critical factors for successful e-government programs. Online Information Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0158

Bharosa, N., Meijer, K., & Van Der Voort, H. (2020). Innovation in public service design: Developing a co-creation tool for public service innovation journeys. In E. S.-J. & L. J. (Eds.), 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Intelligent Government in the Intelligent Information Society, DGO 2020 (pp. 275–284). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396981

Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services. In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204956

Creswell, J. W., & Tashakkori, A. (2007). Editorial: Developing Publishable Mixed Methods Manuscripts. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298644

Daigneault, P. M., & Jacob, S. (2014). Unexpected but Most Welcome: Mixed Methods for the Validation and Revision of the Participatory Evaluation Measurement Instrument. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813486190

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117

Flumian, M. (2018). The Management of Integrated Service Delivery: Lessons from Canada (Issue March).

Hou, X., Wu, S., Chen, D., Cheng, M., Yu, X., Yan, D., Dang, Y., & Peng, M. (2021). Can urban public services and ecosystem services achieve positive synergies? Ecological Indicators, 124, 107433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107433

Ikhsan, K., Samin, R., Akhyary, E., Negara, I. A., Maritim, U., Ali, R., Publik, M. P., Ahead, T., Again, T., & Across, T. (2020). Implementasi Dynamic Governance Dalam Penyelenggaraan Mal Pelayanan Publik Kota Batam. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 7(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/dinamika.v7i3.3561

Karwan, K. R., & Markland, R. E. (2006). Integrating service design principles and information technology to improve delivery and productivity in public sector operations: The case of the South Carolina DMV. Journal of Operations Management, 24(4 SPEC. ISS.), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.06.003

Laitinen, I., Kinder, T., & Stenvall, J. (2018). Street-level new public governances in integrated services-as-a-system. Public Management Review, 20(6), 845–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1340506

Leech, N. L., Dellinger, A. B., Brannagan, K. B., & Tanaka, H. (2010). Evaluating mixed research studies: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809345262

Mertens, D. M. (2011). Publishing mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810390217

Neshkova, M. I., & Guo, H. (David). (2018). Policy Target Populations and Public Participation in Agency Decision Making. International Public Management Journal, 21(2), 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1160012

Osborne, S P, Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927

Osborne, Stephen P. (2018). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461

Puryatama, A. F., & Haryani, T. N. (2020). Pelayanan Prima Melalui Penyelenggaraan Mal Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Kybernan : Jurnal Studi Kepemerintahan, 3(1), 40–54.

Ramadani, V., Anggadwita, G., Welsh, D. H. B., & Permatasari, A. (2020). Social innovation in public sector services. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 6(3), 416–433.

Ristiani, I. Y. (2020). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Pada Mall Pelayanan Publik di Kabupaten Sumedang Provinsi Jawa Barat. Coopetition: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, XI(2), 165–178.

Roy, J., & Langford, J. (2008). Integrating Service Delivery Across Levels of Government : Case Studies of Canada and Other Countries Collaboration : Networks and Partnerships Series Integrating Service Delivery Across Levels of Government : Case Studies of Canada and Other Countries. Integrating Service Delivery Across Levels of Government, 1–65.

Sari, R. P., & Rahayu, A. Y. S. (2021). Analysis Of Factors Affecting Policy Implementation Of Public Service Hall. Perspektif, 10(1), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v10i1.4300

Sicilia, M., Guarini, E., Sancino, A., Andreani, M., & Ruffini, R. (2016). Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566008

Valenduc, G., & Vendramin, P. (2017). Digitalisation, between disruption and evolution. Transfer, 23(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701379

van der Wal, Z., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2020). Public sector innovation in the Asia-pacific trends, challenges, and opportunities. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(3), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12435

Velsberg, O., Westergren, U. H., & Jonsson, K. (2020). Exploring smartness in public sector innovation - creating smart public services with the Internet of Things. European Journal of Information Systems, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1761272

Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Timeus, K., Tonurist, P., & Tummers, L. (2017). Changing public service delivery: Learning in co-creation. Policy and Society, 36(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1323711

Waller, P. (2017). Co-production and co-creation in public services: Resolving confusion and contradictions. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 13(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2017040101

Wei, M., Bai, C., Li, C., & Wang, H. (2020). The effect of host–guest interaction in tourist co-creation in public services: evidence from Hangzhou. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 25(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2020.1741412

Wimmer, M. A. (2002). Integrated Service Modelling for Online One-stop Government. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/101967802320245910

Yonanda, I. (2013). Efektivitas Pelayanan Izin Mendirikan Bangunan (IMB) Dalam Sektor Industri Pariwisata Di Kota Batu (Studi Pada Kantor Pelayanan Perizinan Terpadu Kota Batu). Jurnal Administrasi Publik Mahasiswa Universitas Brawijaya, 1(1), 70–78.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v9i2.13482

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Office: 
Master of Government Affairs and Administration (MIP)
Postgraduate Building 2nd Floor UMY

Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 173)

Jl. Brawijaya, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.