Email this article Smart City Policy: Strategy and Implementation to Realize Smart Urban Governance in Indonesia
Abstract
This paper delves into the intricate landscape of Smart City policies, strategies, and implementation challenges in Indonesia, with a particular emphasis on smart urban governance. Despite significant global discourse, the formulation and execution of Smart City initiatives in Indonesia remain fragmented, resulting in inconsistencies across governance frameworks. To address these gaps, this study systematically analyzes 213 Scopus-indexed articles on "smart city policies" and "smart urban governance" using VOSviewer and Nvivo 12 Plus, alongside an in-depth examination of relevant regulatory documents. The findings underscore three pivotal strategies for advancing smart urban governance in Indonesia: (1) the imperative for cohesive, national-level support in shaping Smart City policies, (2) the strategic incorporation of technological advancements to drive effective implementation, and (3) the critical need to overcome institutional and human resource constraints that hinder progress. Moreover, the study highlights key urban challenges, such as mega-urbanization, urban management, affordable housing for low-income populations, sustainable infrastructure development, and disaster resilience, as pressing concerns. The state of the art in this research lies in its innovative use of advanced analytical tools VOSviewer and Nvivo to map and assess policy and governance frameworks, a methodological approach seldom applied in this context. The novelty of the study resides in its proposal of a multi-level governance model that harmonizes national policy directives with the distinct needs of local urban governance, integrating technological, institutional, and regulatory dimensions for a more cohesive and sustainable Smart City strategy. This study contributes by mapping the challenges and opportunities of Smart City policy in Indonesia and proposing a multi-level approach to align national policy with local governance needs.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allwinkle, Sam & Cruickshank, P. (2011). Creating Smart-er Cities: An Overview. Journal of Urban Technology, Routledge, 18(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601103
Arafah, Y., & Winarso, H. (2020). Peningkatan dan Penguatan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Konteks Smart City. Tataloka, 22(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.22.1.27-40
BAPPENAS. (2015). Keynote Address- BAPPENAS.pdf.
Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., … Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2289–2297. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2012.615
Cocchia, A. (2014). Smart and Digital City: A Systematic Literature Review. In R. P. Dameri & C. RosenthalSabroux (Eds.), Smart City (pp. 13–43). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_2
Denney, Andrew S., and R. T. (2013). How to Write a Literature Review. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2012.730617
Hasibuan, A., & Sulaiman, oris krianto. (2019). Smart City , Konsep Kota Cerdas Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Masalah Perkotaan Kabupaten / Kota. Buletinutama Teknik, 14(2), 127–135.
Insani, P. A. (2017). Mewujudkan Kota Responsif Melalui Smart City. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 2(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v2i1.1423
Jucevičius, R., Patašienė, I., & Patašius, M. (2014). Digital Dimension of Smart City: Critical Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 146–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.137
Khairunnisa, T., Purnomo, E. P., & Salsabila, L. (2020). Upaya Rehabilitasi dan Preventif Pengemis dan Gelandangan. Journal Moderat, 6(1), 29–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v6i1.3156
Latifa, N. (2013). Urban Governance dalam Kerangka Otonomi Daerah. Jakarta: LIPI.
Lazuardi, A. L. (2015). Manajemen Strategis Inovasi dan Teknologi, terjemahan dari Strategic Management of Technological Innovation, by Mellissa A. Schilling (2013). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar.
Muslim, Ardila., & Teguh. K. (2020). Community Action Plan (CAP) Dalam Penataan Kawasan Kumuh dari Perspektif Good Urban Governance: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur. J-3P (Jurnal Pembangunan Pemberdayaan Pemerintahan), 5(1), 33–50 . https://doi.org/10.33701/j-3p.v5i1.1023
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602
Nugraha, M. Q. (2014). Manajemen Strategis Pemerintahan (cetakan ke). Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Terbuka.
Safaruddin. (2018). Urban Governance Melalui Layanan Home Care (Dottoro’ta) Di Kota Makassar.
Slack, E., & Côté, A. (2014). Comparative Urban Governance. Future of Cities: Working Paper. July.
Sudaryono. (2014). Perilaku Konsumen Dalam Prespektif Pemasaran. Jakarta: Lentera Ilmu Cendekia.
Susena, B., & Widowaty, Y. (2018). Konsep Pengendalian Tata Ruang Sesuai Asas Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Kabupaten Sleman. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Ke, 7. 32–42.
UN Habita. (2002). The Global Campaign on Urban Governance. Concept Paper.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v10i1.13840
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Governance and Public Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Office:
Master of Government Affairs and Administration (MIP)
Postgraduate Building 2nd Floor UMY
Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 173)
Jl. Brawijaya, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.