Email this article Comparative Analysis of the State Speeches of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Joko Widodo using the Aristotelian perspective
Abstract
This study aims to compare the rhetoric of SBY & Jokowi's state speeches during the administration of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono in the first period between 2009 and 2014 and President Joko Widodo in the first period, namely between 2014 and 2019 using Aristotle's rhetorical perspective. This study uses a qualitative method approach. The data sources in this study were taken from SBY's state speech (2009-2014) and 498 Jokowi dodo citizenship speeches (2014-2019) which were published in national ceremonies. The findings in this study indicate that SBY combines deliberative and forensic rhetoric in delivering his speech, while Jokowi consistently uses deliberative rhetoric in each theme. In maintaining executive-legislative relations, Jokowi's political communication style seems to be more effective than SBY's, but in maintaining relations within the executive, especially in the cabinet. SBY is more effective.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anibal S. Perez-Linan (2003) “The Political and Economic Consequences of Executive-Legislative Crisis,” paper presentasi pada The Latin American Studies Association, Dallas, Texas. Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh
Anthony DeForest Molina and Michael W. Spicer (2004) “Aristotelian Rhetoric, Pluralism, and Public Administration”, Administration & Society 2004.
Aristotle, Rhetoric (2012), terjemahan W. Rhys Roberts, Courier Corporation.
Aristotle (2004) The Art of Rhetoric. London: Penguin Books.
……………..(1991) On Rheforic: A Theoryo/Civic Discourse, terjemahan G. A. Kennedy (New York. Oxford Universily Press.
……………..(1954) The rhetoric and the poetics of Aristotle (terjemahan W. R. Roberts & I. Bywater). New York: The Modern Library.
Ceaser, James W.; Glen E. Thuerow; Jeffrey K. Tulis; Joseph M. Bessette (1981). "The Rise of the Rhetorical Presidency". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 11 (2).
Budd, R., Thorp, R., & Donohew, L. (1967) Content analysis of communications. London: The Collier-McMillan Limited.
Daniel Riffe, Stephen Lacy, Frederick G. Fico (2005) Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hara, N., Bonk, C., & Angeli, C. (2000) “Content analyses of on-line discussion in an applied educational psychology course.” Instructional Science. 28 (2).
Jose Antonio Cheibub (2002) “Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations, and the Survival of Presidential Democracies,” Comparative Political Studies, 35 (3)
Ose Antonio Cheibub, Adam Przeworski and Sebastian M. Saiegh (2004) “Government Coalitions and Legislative Success Under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism,” British Journal of Political Science 34
Juan J. Linz (1994) “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy : Does it Make a Difference,” dalam Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela, eds., The Failure of Presidential Democracy : The Case of Latin America (Baltimore : The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994)
Kathryn Hochstetler (2000) Rethinking Presidentialism: Challenges and Presidential Falls in South America, Comparative Politics, (New York : The City University of New York),
Liam Rourke, Terry Anderson, D. Randy Garrison, Walter Archer (2001) “Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED)
Sarah A. Binder, “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock (1947-1996),” The American Political Science Review, 93 (3)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v9i1.14017
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Office:
Master of Government Affairs and Administration (MIP)
Postgraduate Building 2nd Floor UMY
Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 173)
Jl. Brawijaya, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.