Pro and Contra of the Parliamentary Threshold among Electoral Management Bodies (EMBs) and Political Parties: Seeking a Relevant Model for Indonesia’s Legislative Election

Ridho Al-Hamdi, Sakir Sakir, Tanto Lailam

Abstract


This paper is going to examine the pro and contra among the Electoral Management Bodies’ (EMBs) commissioners and political parties’ functionaries in responding to the parliamentary threshold issue. Methodologically, this paper is based on qualitative research by utilizing a multiple case approach. It is supported by employing Qualitative Data Analysis Software (Q-DAS), namely NVivo 12Plus to analyse the data written in the transcript of the Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with the EMBs’ commissioners and politicians in six provinces and nine cities/counties. The finding demonstrates that the all actors agree to adopt the parliamentary threshold in the national legislative election. Afterward, the mind map contains distinctive issues among EMBs and politicians. Thus, the parliamentary threshold is still required to strengthen the consolidation of Indonesian democracy. Such a threshold is also an essential standard to encourage well institutionalized parties and to modernize them. Thus, four percent of the parliamentary threshold is an ideal model. Subsequently, the increase of the parliamentary threshold percentage is no needed anymore. In addition to that, it is not applied in the regional legislative election.

Keywords


Parliamentary Threshold; Legislative Election; Electoral Management Bodies (EMBs); Political Parties; Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abuza, Z. (2007). Political Islam and Violence in Indonesia. London: Routledge.

Adam, A. F., Betaubun, W. L., & Jalal, N. (2021). Quo Vadis Parliamentary Threshold di Indonesia. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan 6(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v6i1.8618.

Al-Hamdi, R. (2019). The Decline of Ideology in Indonesia: Parliamentary Threshold and Cleavage among Political Parties in coping with the 2019 Election. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 353(October). https://doi.org/10.2991/icosihess-19.2019.47.

Al-Hamdi, R. (2020). Ambang Batas Pemilu: Pertarungan Partai Politik dan Pudarnya Ideologi di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UMY Press.

Al-Hamdi, R. (2021). Ideological Cleavage under Open-list Proportional

Representation System: Parties Position toward the 2019 Indonesia’s

Presidential Threshold. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 14(03), 205-219. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.53514

Aspinall, E. (2010). Indonesia in 2009: Democratic Triumphs and Trials. Southeast Asian Affairs 2010: 103-125.

Bachmid, F. (2020). Eksistensi Kedaulatan Rakyat dan Implementasi Parliamentary Threshold dalam Sistem Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum 2(2): 87–103. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.83.

Bünte, M. & Ufen, A. (2009). The New Order and its Legacy Reflections on Democratization in Indonesia. In: Bünte M & Ufen A (eds). Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia. London: Routledge. 3-29.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, Third Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Dahl, R. A. (2000). On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In: Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage, pp. 1-19.

Devine, F. (2002). Qualitative Methods. In: Marsh, D. & Stoker, G. (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science, Second Edition. New York: Palgrave, pp. 179-215.

Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Fatih, S. A. (2018). Implementasi Parliamentary Threshold Dalam Pemilihan Anggota Dprd Provinsi dan DPRD Kabupaten/Kota. Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2018.6.2.363-388.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case Study. In: Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Fourth Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 301-316.

Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for?. The American Political Science Review. 98 (2), 341-354.

Ginting, F. P. P., & Saragih, A. (2018). Ilusi Demokrasi Substansial di Indonesia: Sebuah Kritik Terhadap Impementasi Parliamentary Treshlod. Politeia: Jurnal Ilmu Politik 10 (2): 79–90. https://doi.org/10.32734/politeia.v10i2.630.

Hadiwinata, B. S., & Schuck, C. (2007). Mapping Indonesia’s Way towards Democracy: In Search of a Theoretical Frame. In: Hadiwinata BS & Schuck C (eds). Democracy in Indonesia: The Challenge of Consolidation. Baden-Baden. Nomos-Verlag. 11-27.

Helmi, H., Mukhrijal, M., & Fadhlullah, N. (2019). Presidential Threshold (Discourse Review on Strengthening Presidential Systems in Indonesia) 292: 225–229. https://doi.org/10.2991/agc-18.2019.36.

Hilmy, M. (2010). Islamism and Democracy in Indonesia: Piety and Pragmatism. Singapore: ISEAS.

Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

Indrawan, J., & Aji, M. P. (2020). Penyederhanaan Partai Politik Melalui Parliamentary Threshold: Pelanggaran Sistematis Terhadap Kedaulatan Rakyat. Jurnal Penelitian Politik 16(2): 155. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v16i2.802.

Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2011). Focus groups: Contingent articulation of pedagogy, politivcs, and inquiry. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 545-561). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Kurniawan, D., Sutan, A. J., Nurmandi, A., Loilatu, M. J., & Salahudin, S. (2021). Social Media as Tools of Disaster Mitigation, Studies on Natural Disasters in Indonesia BT - HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Posters. In: C Stephanidis, M Antona, & S Ntoa (eds). Springer International Publishing. 375–382.

Liddle, R. W., & Mujani, S. (2013). Indonesian Democracy: From Transition to Consolidation. In: Künkler M & Stepan A (eds). Democracy and Islam in Indonesia. New York: Columbia University Press. 24-50.

Maftuh, M. A. (2020). Parliamentary Threshold in Constitutional Election in 2019 (Philosophical Review of the Principles of People Sovereignty) 1: 200–213. https://doi.org/10.18326/jil.v1i2.200-213.

Merkel, W. (2004). Embedded and Defective Democracies. Democratization 11 (5): 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340412331304598.

Merkel, W, & Croissant, A. (2004). Conclusion: Good and defective democracies. Democratization 11 (5): 199-213.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Schuck, C. (2003) Der Indonesische Demokratisierungsprozess: Politischer Neubeginn und historische Kontinuität. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag.

Sutan A. J., Nurmandi, A, Mutiarin, D., & Salahudin, S. (2021) Using Social Media as Tools of Social Movement and Social Protest in Omnibus Law of Job Creation Bill Policy-Making Process in Indonesia. In: Advances in Digital Science: ICADS 2021. Springer International Publishing. 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71782-7_24.

Sutan A. J., Nurmandi, A, & Salahudin, S. (2021). Social Media and Social Movements: Using Social Media on Omnibus Law Job Creation Bill Protest in Indonesia and Anti Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement in Hongkong BT - HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Posters. In: C Stephanidis, M Antona, & S Ntoa (eds). Springer International Publishing. 399–406.

Ufen, A. (2009). Political Parties and Democratization in Indonesia. In: Bünte M & Ufen A (eds). Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia. London: Routledge. 153-175.

Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v9i3.15149

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Office: 
Master of Government Affairs and Administration (MIP)
Postgraduate Building 2nd Floor UMY

Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 173)

Jl. Brawijaya, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.