Democratic Innovation from West Sumbawa Regency, Indonesia: Analysis of Forum YASINAN as an Instrument of Community Participation in Development

Johan Wahyudi

Abstract


This article aims to explain how the Forum YASINAN, as an actualization of democratic innovation, can become an instrument of public participation in regional development in the West Sumbawa Regency. Studies have shown that the lack of public involvement in encouraging public policy and democratic political processes is a problem in developing countries, particularly at the local government level. However, this study demonstrates how local governments can solve community problems through democratic innovation. This study was conducted in West Sumbawa. This study used democratic innovation and participatory democracy as the framework for thinking by interviewing the initiators of Forum YASINAN, representatives of beneficiary communities from eight sub-districts in West Sumbawa, a literature study, and field observations. The findings indicated that Forum YASINAN, conducted by the West Sumbawa Regency Government, has become an innovation that can increase public participation in the development process. One of the innovative aspects of the YASINAN Forum is that the Regent and Deputy Regent provide an informal space for the community to evaluate public services. It simultaneously encourages community participation as demos in which they can voice their aspirations to control the government through informal channels. The forum, which is held every week in turn in each sub-district, shows the local government’s strong willingness to encourage public participation. This study contributes by showing how governments can solve community problems through democratic innovation in the case of the West Sumbawa Regency.


Keywords


Democratic innovation; forum YASINAN; participatory democracy; public participation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Almer, H. L. & Koontz, T. M. (2004). Public hearings for EIAs in post-communist Bulgaria: do they work?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(5), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2003.12.004

Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D., Sarshar, M., & Newton, R. (2002). Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach. Work study, 51(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/00438020210415488

Asrori, A., & Kartika, R. S. (2018). Penyusunan Petunjuk Teknis Penilaian Innovative Government Award (IGA) Tahun 2017. Inovasi, 15(2), 65-76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33626/inovasi.v15i2.53

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat. (2023). Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat 2023. Sumbawa Barat: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat. (2024). Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat Dalam Angka (Sumbawa Barat Regency in Figures) 2024. Sumbawa Barat: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Bayo, L. N., Santoso, P., & Samadhi, W. P. (Eds.). (2018). Rezim Lokal di Indonesia: Memaknai Ulang Demokrasi Kita. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia bekerjasama dengan PolGov Fisipol UGM dan University of Oslo.

Bentzen, T. Ø., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2020). Strengthening public service production, administrative problemsolving, and political leadership through co-creation of innovative public value outcomes?. Innovation Journal, 25(1), 1–28.

Binnema, H., Michels, A., Hart, P., & van der Torre, L. (2020). Democratic innovations in Dutch local government: Experimentation in search of strategy. The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 25(1), 1–21.

Böker, M., & Elstub, S. (2015). The possibility of critical mini-publics: Realpolitik and normative cycles in democratic theory. Representation, 51(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2015.1026205

Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2013). Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x

Christensen, H. S. (2018). Knowing and distrusting: how political trust and knowledge shape direct-democratic participation. European Societies, 20(4), 572–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2017.1402124

Cohen, J. (2009). Reflections on deliberative democracy. In Political Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 217–235). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310399.ch14

Creighton, J. L. (2005). The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions Through Citizen Involvement. United States: Jossey-Bass.

Della Porta, D. (2013). Can Democracy Be Saved? Cambridge: Polity Press.

Dharmanu, I. P. (2017). Modernisasi dan Inovasi dalam Pelayanan Publik Melalui E-Government di Kota Denpasar. Adhum: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu Administrasi dan Humaniora, 7(2), 93–108.

Elstub, S. (2018). Deliberative and Participatory Democracy. in The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.5

Elstub, S & Escobar, O (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance. Cheltenham. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433862

Fachrudin, M. A., & Yuwono, T. (2017). Inovasi Kepemimpinan Kepala Daerah (Studi Kasus: Walikota Surabaya Ir. Tri Rismaharini, MT). Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 6(2), 141–150.

Forbrig, J. (2011). Introduction: Citizen Participation and Local Democracy in Europe. Learning for Local Democracy: A Study of Local Citizen Participation in Europe, edited by Joerg Forbrig, 5–20.

Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 280, 112516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516

Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy (3rd edition). Stanford University Press.

Hendriks, C. M., Dryzek, J. S., and Hunold, C. (2007). Turning up the Heat: Partisanship in Deliberative Innovation. Political Studies, 55(2), 362–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00667.x

Investor.id. (2019). Jawa Timur, Surabaya, dan Banyuwangi Raih Penghargaan Anugerah Pandu Negeri Tertinggi di IIPG. Retrieved from https://investor.id/national/198100/jawa-timur-surabaya-dan-banyuwangi-raih-penghargaan-anugerah-pandu-negeri-tertinggi-di-iipg

Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x

Jacobs, L. R., Cook, F. L., & Carpini, M. X. D. (2009). Talking together: Public deliberation and political participation in America. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226389899.001.0001

Jäske, M. (2018). Democratic Innovations in Finnish Local Politics. Essays on Varieties, Causes and Consequences of Mechanisms for Direct Citizen Participation. Turun yliopiston julkaisuja, Sarja B osa, 462.

Kurniadi, B. D., Hanif, H., Erawan, I. K. P., Ala, L. N. B., Ikhsanto, M. A., Kurniawan, N. I., ... & Pamungkas, S. (2009). Menuju bekerjanya tata pemerintahan lokal yang baik: Partisipasi, transparansi, dan akuntabilitas. Monograph on Politics & Government, 3, 1–86.

Manowong, E., & Ogunlana, S. O. (2006). Public hearings in Thailand's infrastructure projects: effective participations?. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(4), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980610680162

Michels, A., & De Graaf, L. (2010). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies, 36(4), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2010.494101

Michels, A. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: how does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy?. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311399851

Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Mikami, N. (2019). Trends in democratic innovation in Asia. In Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, (pp. 421–434). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433862.00040

Mindarti, L. I. (2016). The Implementation of participation principles in good governance. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 2(2), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2016.002.02.7

Mustofa, S. (2021). Forum Yasinan: Jalan Pemerintahan Terbuka. Jakarta: Guepedia.

Mustofa, S., & Halikin, A. (2020). Pembangunan Daerah Berbasis Gotong Royong di Indonesia (Mereplikasi Inovasi Model Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat. Jakarta: Guepedia.

Nabatchi, T., & Amsler, L. B. (2014). Direct public engagement in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(4_suppl), 63S–88S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013519702

Nabatchi, T., & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119154815

Nyaranga, M. S., Hao, C., & Hongo, D. O. (2021). The Role of Public Participation in Governance towards Achieving Sustainable Development. Part 1. RUDN Journal of Public Administration, 8(4), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2021-8-4-395-404

Open Government Partnership. (2021). 2021 OGP Awards: West Sumbawa, Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mvQp_TSnYM, diakses 17 Desember 2021.

Pitriyanti, D., & Harsasto, P. (2019). Kepemimpinan Ridwan Kamil Di Koa Bandung Tahun 2013-2018: Kajian Inovasi Kebijakan Kepemimpinan Adaptif. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 8(02), 101–110. Retrieved from https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/23561

PPID KSB. (2023). Angka Kemiskinan Sumbawa Barat Turun, Provinsi NTB Malah Naik. Retrieved from https://ppid.sumbawabaratkab.go.id/en/article/angka-kemiskinan-sumbawa-barat-turun-provinsi-ntb-malah-naik

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Elam, G., Tennant, R., & Rahim, N. (2003). Designing and selecting samples. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, 2, 111–145.

Roiseland, A., & Vabo, S. I. (2020). Administrators as Drivers of Democratic Innovations. The Innovation Journal, 25(1), 1–20.

Quick, K. S., & Bryson, J. M. (2022). Public participation. In Handbook on Theories of Governance. Edward Elgar Press, (pp. 158-168).

Saward, M., (Ed.). (2000). Democratic Innovation. London and New York: Routledge.

Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609848

Sørensen, E. (2016). Political innovations: innovations in political institutions, processes and outputs. Public Management Review, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1200661

Sorensen, E., & Vabo, S. I. (2020). A Public Innovation Perspective on Change in Local Democracy. Innovation Journal, (1).

Torfing, J. (2016). Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Washington: Georgetown University Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/book48834

Vitale, D. (2006). Between Deliberative and Participatory Democracy: A Contribution on Habermas. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 32(6), 739–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453706064022

Wahyudi, J. (2016). Implementasi Pembangunan Berbasis Rukun Tetangga (PBRT): Pengalaman Tata Kelola Pemerintahan di Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat. Government: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(1), 1–10.

Wiryanto, W. (2021). Pengembangan Tipologi Inovasi Pelayanan Publik: Studi Layanan Administrasi Kependudukan di Indonesia (The Development Of Public Service Innovation Typology). Inovasi: Jurnal Politik dan Kebijakan, 18(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.33626/inovasi.v18i1.302




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i3.18570

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Governance and Public Policy

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 


Office: 
Master of Government Affairs and Administration (MIP)
Postgraduate Building 2nd Floor UMY

Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 173)

Jl. Brawijaya, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.