Exploring Patterns of Collective Corruption and Integrity Risks by Regional Heads in Indonesia

Mohammad Hidayaturrahman; Astriana Baiti Sinaga; Ahmad Hasan Ubaid; Anak Agung Putu Sugiantiningsih; Elazhari Elazhari; Sudarman Sudarman

doi:10.18196/jgpp.v12i2.22081

Authors

Mohammad Hidayaturrahman Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Wiraraja, Sumenep, Indonesia
Astriana Baiti Sinaga Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
Ahmad Hasan Ubaid Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Anak Agung Putu Sugiantiningsih Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia
Elazhari Elazhari Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia, Medan, Indonesia
Sudarman Sudarman Faculty of Adab and Humaniora, Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol, Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v12i2.22081

Keywords:

Collective corruption, Regional head, Oligarchy

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the collective corruption networks involving regional heads in Indonesia. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, data were gathered from secondary sources, including major national online media outlets such as Kompas, Tempo, CNN Indonesia, Antara, Detik, Liputan6, Tribun, and Jawapos. The data were analyzed through content analysis, focusing on news reports concerning regional head corruption cases from 2005 to 2023—a period marked by the implementation of direct regional elections. The findings reveal a growing phenomenon of collective corruption in which regional heads and business actors engage in collusion, forming new oligarchic power structures at the local level. This model of collective corruption encompasses both internal and external networks. Internal networks include the regional head’s family members and close staff, while external networks involve entrepreneurs and legislative representatives such as members of local parliaments. Empirically, the study identifies a pattern of systemic corruption facilitated by political actors who collaborate across government and business sectors. Theoretically, the research contributes to the evolving discourse on collective corruption by illustrating how corruption becomes institutionalized and deeply embedded in local governance structures. Regional heads emerge as central actors, establishing corruption networks that divert public funds—particularly from the Regional Budget and Revenue and Expenditure allocations—to serve private interests and consolidate political power. The novelty of this research lies in its identification of the dual role played by both private entrepreneurs and bureaucratic elements in financing corrupt practices. Moreover, it highlights how family members and staff serve as intermediaries in the process of fund misappropriation, enabling the entrenchment of corruption at the local level.

References

Asrinaldi, Yusoff, M. A., & Karim, Z. A. (2021). Oligarchy in the Jokowi government and its influence on the implementation of legislative function in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891121995564

Aven, B., & Iorio, A. (2023). Organizing for misconduct: A social network lens on collective corporate corruption. Elsevier Research in Organizational Behavior, 43, 100191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2023.100191

Baez-Camargo, Costa, C. and, Hans, J. and, Koechlin, V. and, Wannenwetsch, L. and, & Scarlet. (2021). It takes a network to defeat a network: What Collective Action practitioners can learn from research into corrupt networks. https://doi.org/10.12685/bigpb.8.1-10

Bazurli, R., & Portos, M. (2019). Crook!: The impact of perceived corruption on non-electoral forms of political behaviour. International Political Science Review, 42(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119881710

Carson, L. D., & Prado, M. M. (2016). Using institutional multiplicity to address corruption as a collective action problem: Lessons from the Brazilian case. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 62, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.009

Ceva, E., & Ferretti, M. P. (2017). Political corruption. Philosophy Compass, 12(12), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12461

Damanik, I., Rompas, A., Nadia, Z., Berenschot, W., & Warburton, E. (2025). Business-Politics Relations in Indonesia: The Oligarchisation of Democracy. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 61(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2024.2442417

Domhoff, G. W. (2005). Power Structure Research and the Hope for Democracy. Who Rules America, April, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/3377032

Fatkuroji, I., & Diana, S. (2021). Pilihan Publik dalam Kasus Korupsi APBD dan Kepala Daerah. INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(2), 345–347. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.799

Ford, M., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2014). Beyond Oligarchy? In Beyond Oligarchy: Wealth, Power, and Contemporary Indonesian Politics, (pp. 1-10). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501719158-003

Fukuoka, Y. (2013). Oligarchy and Democracy in Post-Suharto Indonesia. Political Studies Review, 11(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00286.x

Gerring, J., & Thacker, S. C. (2004). Political Institutions and Corruption: The Role of Unitarism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 295–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000067

Hadiz, V. R., & Robison, R. (2014). The Political Economy of Oligarchy and the Reorganization of Power in Indonesia. In M. Ford, T. B. Pepinsky, & Ithaca (Eds.), Beyond Oligarchy: Wealth, Power, and Contemporary Indonesian Politics (pp. 35-56). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501719158-005

Hannon, M., & de Ridder, J. (Eds.). (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429326769

Haryanto, & Mahsun, M. (2024). Business and Politics in Urban Indonesia: Patrimonialism, Oligarchy and the State in Two Towns. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 43(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034241264574

Hashimov, E. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook and The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers: Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975966

Heydari, M. (2024). Corruption as a collective behavior. In Corruption and Entrepreneurship (1st ed., p. 202). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003452508

Heywood, P. (1997). Political Corruption: Problems and Perspectives. Political Studies, 45(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00089

Hidayaturrahman, M., Ngarawula, B., & Sadhana, K. (2020). Political investors: Political elite oligarchy and mastery of regional resources in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891120917213

Huang, Q., & Yuan, T. (2021). Does political corruption impede firm innovation? evidence from the United States. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(1), 213–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109019000966

Igiebor, G. O. (2019). Political Corruption in Nigeria: Implications for Economic Development in the Fourth Republic. Journal of Developing Societies, 35(4), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X19890745

Kamel, I. R., Wahab, S. A. El, & Ashmawy, I. K. I. M. (2021). Public attitude as a determinant of petty corruption in Egypt: a survey study. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 4(5), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHASS-07-2021-0124

Kerrigan, D. (2020). Bobol as a Transhistorical Cultural Logic: The Coloniality of Corruption in Trinidad. Caribbean Quarterly, 66(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00086495.2020.1759231

Lehne, J., Shapiro, J. N., & Vanden Eynde, O. (2018). Building connections: Political corruption and road construction in India. Journal of Development Economics, 131(October 2017), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2017.10.009

Levati, M. V., & Nardi, C. (2023). Letting third parties who suffer from petty corruption talk: Evidence from a collusive bribery experiment. European Journal of Political Economy, 76, 102233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2022.102233

Lewis, J. S. (2020). Corruption Perceptions and Contentious Politics in Africa: How Different Types of Corruption Have Shaped Africa’s Third Wave of Protest. Political Studies Review, 19(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920903657

Luna-Pla, I., & Nicolás-Carlock, J. R. (2020). Corruption and complexity: a scientific framework for the analysis of corruption networks. Appl Netw Sci, 5(3), 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-020-00258-2

Marquette, H., & Peiffer, C. (2015). Corruption and collective action. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2475090

Mietzner, M. (2010). Indonesia’s Direct Elections: Empowering the electorate or Entrenching the New Order Oligarchy? (E. Aspinall & G. Fealy, Eds.). ANU ePress. https://doi.org/10.22459/SNOL.08.2010.11

Mietzner, M. (2014). Oligarchs, Politicians, and Activists: Contesting Party Politics in Post-Suharto Indonesia. In M. F. T, homas B. Pepinsky, & Ithaca (Eds.), Beyond Oligarchy: Wealth, Power, and Contemporary Indonesian Politics (pp. 99-116). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501719158-008

Natow, R. S. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119830077

Neshkova, M. I., & Kalesnikaite, V. (2019). Corruption and citizen participation in local government: Evidence from Latin America. Governance, 32(4), 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12401

Nguyen, M.-L. T., & Bui, N. T. (2022). Government expenditure and economic growth: does the role of corruption control matter? Heliyon, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10822

Nicolás-Carlock, J. R., & Luna-Pla, I. (2021). Conspiracy of Corporate Networks in Corruption Scandals. Frontiers in Physics, 9, 667471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.667471

Nieto-Morales, F., Peeters, R., & Lotta, G. (2024). Burdens, bribes, and bureaucrats: the political economy of petty corruption and administrative burdens. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muae010

Nyberg, D. (2021). Corporations, Politics, and Democracy: Corporate political activities as political corruption. Organization Theory, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720982618

Palmer, D. (2008). Extending the process model of collective corruption. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 107–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.005

Palmer, D., & Maher, M. W. (2006). Developing the process model of collective corruption. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(4), 363–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492606295090

Pereyra, S. (2019). Corruption Scandals and Anti-Corruption Policies in Argentina. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 11(3), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X19894791

Persson, A., & Teorell, B. R. (2012). Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail-Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem. Governance, 26(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x

Rahman, M. A. (2018). Governance matters: climate change, corruption, and livelihoods in Bangladesh. Climatic Change, 147(1–2), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2139-9

Romero, D. (2024). Unpacking Bribery: Petty Corruption and Favor Exchanges. Latin American Politics and Society, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2024.50

Ruhl, J. M. (2018). Political Corruption in Central America: Assessment and Explanation. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00108.x

Saad-Filho, A., & Boffo, M. (2021). The corruption of democracy: Corruption scandals, class alliances, and political authoritarianism in Brazil. Geoforum, 124(February), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.003

Sadik-Zada, E. R., Gatto, A., & Niftiyev, I. (2022). E-government and petty corruption in public sector service delivery. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(12), 3987–4003. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2067037

Saha, S., & Sen, K. (2023). Do economic and political crises lead to corruption? The role of institutions. Economic Modelling, 124, 106307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106307

Santos, K. da S., Ribeiro, M. C., Queiroga, D. E. U. de, Silva, I. A. P. da, & Ferreira, S. M. S. (2020). The use of multiple triangulations as a validation strategy in a qualitative study. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva, 25(2), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.12302018

Schönhage, N. L., & Geys, B. (2021). Partisan bias in politicians’ perception of scandals. Party Politics, 28(4), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068821998024

Slingerland, W. (2021). Social capital, corrupt networks, and network corruption. Corruption Networks: Concepts and Applications, 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81484-7_2

Smith-Crowe, K., & Warren, D. E. (2014). The Emotion-Evoked Collective Corruption Model: The Role of Emotion in the Spread of Corruption Within Organizations. Organization Science, 25(4), 1154–1171. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0896

Spyromitros, E., & Panagiotidis, M. (2022). The impact of corruption on economic growth in developing countries and a comparative analysis of corruption measurement indicators. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2129368

Tambunan, D. (2023). The intervention of oligarchy in the Indonesian legislative process. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(2), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231159395

Wedel, J. R. (2017). From Power Elites to Influence Elites: Resetting Elite Studies for the 21st Century. Theory, Culture and Society, 34(5–6), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417715311

Winters, J. A. (2014). Oligarchy and Democracy in Indonesia. In M. Ford, T. B. Pepinsky, & Ithaca (Eds.), Beyond Oligarchy: Wealth, Power, and Contemporary Indonesian Politics (pp. 11-34). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501719158-004

Yu, K.-H., Kang, S.-D., & Rhodes, C. (2018). The Partial Organization of Networked Corruption. Business & Society, 59(7), 1377–1409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318775024

Exploring Patterns of Collective Corruption and Integrity Risks by Regional Heads in Indonesia

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License