The Role of Good Governance Indicators in Controlling Corruption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v12i1.22287Keywords:
Corruption Control, Good Governance, Local GovernmentAbstract
Corruption control is a critical component of effective governance, particularly within local governments in Indonesia. This study examines the relationship between good governance indicators and corruption control within the local government of Yogyakarta City, Indonesia, aiming to identify key governance factors that influence anti-corruption efforts. A quantitative research approach was employed, using descriptive statistical methods to analyze data collected from questionnaires distributed to five local government agencies in Yogyakarta City. A total of 98 respondents were selected through purposive sampling. Data analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with Partial Least Squares (PLS) to assess the reliability, validity, and regression performance of the good governance indicators. Reliability was measured using Composite Reliability (CR), with values above 0.70 indicating strong reliability, and validity was assessed based on Outer Loading, with values above 0.70 considered valid. Regression analysis indicated that control of corruption, political stability, and voice and accountability significantly influence corruption control, with p-values of 0.010, 0.009, and 0.029, respectively. However, government effectiveness and the rule of law did not show a significant impact on corruption control, with p-values of 0.381 and 0.799. These findings suggest that specific governance factors, such as political stability and accountability, play a critical role in addressing corruption within local governments in Indonesia. The study introduces a novel approach by employing a quantitative SEM-PLS method to examine good governance indicators in Yogyakarta City. The findings suggest that government effectiveness and the rule of law may not have a significant influence on corruption control, challenging common assumptions in governance research.
References
Akimova, L., Litvinova, I. F., Ilchenko, H. O., Pomaza-Ponomarenko, A. L., & Yemets, O. I. (2020). The negative impact of corruption on the economic security of states. International Journal of Management, 11(5), 1058–1071.
Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021). Factors Influencing the Citizens’ Acceptance of Electronic Government. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management, 5(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijebm.5.1.5
Andhika, L. R., Nurasa, H., Karlina, N., & Candradewini, C. (2019). Innovation of Regional Participation Budgeting Through A Social Media Platform Model. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 15(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v15i2.387
Anjarbati, N., & Pribadi, U. (2022). Pengaruh Kualitas Sistem, Kualitas Informasi, Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Penggunaan Smart Government Di Kabupaten Lampung Selatan. Jurnal Caraka Prabu, 6(1), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.36859/jcp.v6i1.937
Arkorful, V. E., Lugu, B. K., Hammond, A., & Basiru, I. (2021). Decentralization and Citizens’ Participation in Local Governance: Does Trust and Transparency Matter?–An Empirical Study. Forum for Development Studies, 48(2), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2021.1872698
Arshad, S., & Khurram, S. (2020). Can government’s presence on social media stimulate citizens’ online political participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101486
Asbarini, N. F. E., Isnaini, L., & Wibowo, M. G. (2021). Pengaruh Tata Kelola Pemerintah Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di ASEAN. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 12(1), 82–93.
Asteriou, D., Pilbeam, K., & Tomuleasa, I. (2021). The impact of corruption, economic freedom, regulation and transparency on bank profitability and bank stability: Evidence from the Eurozone area. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 184, 150–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.08.023
Badaruddin, B., & Daud, A. (2022). Pengaruh pengembangan karir, kompetensi dosen dan knowledge management terhadap kinerja dosen pada ITB Nobel Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Manajemen Nobel Indonesia, 3(5), 845–857.
Bahri, M., Sakka, O., & Kallal, R. (2021). The impact of corruption on the export intensity of SMEs in Tunisia: moderating effects of political instability and regulatory obstacles. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(5), 1134–1151. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-03-2020-0055
Batalla, E. V. C. (2020). Police corruption and its control in the Philippines. Asian Education and Development Studies, 9(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-05-2018-0099
Biduri, S., Hariyanto, W., Maryanti, E., Nurasik, N., & Sartika, S. (2022). the Perspektif Theory of Planned Behavior Terhadap Intensi Pns Untuk Melakukan Whistleblowing. Media Mahardhika, 20(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.29062/mahardika.v20i2.352
Budiman, M. A., & Amyar, F. (2021). The effect of audit opinions, implementation of audit recommendations, and findings of state losses on corruption levels in the ministries and institutions of the Republic of Indonesia. Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 7(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v7i1.471
Chen, C., & Neshkova, M. I. (2020). The effect of fiscal transparency on corruption: A panel cross-country analysis. Public Administration, 98(1), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12620
Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2021). Relating e-government development to government effectiveness and control of corruption: a cluster analysis. Journal of Chinese Governance, 6(1), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2019.1698693
Chong, S. P. C., Tee, C. M., & Cheng, S. V. (2021). Political institutions and the control of corruption: a cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2020-0094
Dizrisa, D. A., Sudrajat, S., & Kusumawardani, N. (2020). Pengaruh Elemen Good Governance Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Di Asia Tenggara. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan (JAK), 25(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.23960/jak.v25i1.242
Erkkilä, T. (2020). Transparency in Public Administration. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, February, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1404
Fu, T., & Jian, Z. (2021). Corruption pays off: How environmental regulations promote corporate innovation in a developing country. Ecological Economics, 183(January), 106969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106969
Gabriel, A. G., Antonio, M. A. B., & Ramos, V. B. (2019). Transparency and Accountability in Local Governance: The Nexus Between Democracy and Public Service Delivery in the Philippines. Public Policy and Administration Research, 9(7), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.7176/PPAR/9-7-04
Hassan, S. A. (2017). Investigating the Relationship of E-Government, Control of Corruption, Economic Prosperity and Environmental Degradation: An Analysis of Asian Region. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 3(2), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.32.2002
Hue, T. H. H., & Tung-Wen Sun, M. (2022). Democratic Governance: Examining the Influence of Citizen Participation on Local Government Performance in Vietnam. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1939713
Humas DIY. (2024). Visi Anti Korupsi Turut Jadi Pandu Bagi Pemda DIY. https://jogjaprov.go.id/berita/visi-anti-korupsi-turut-jadi-pandu-bagi-pemda-diy
Indraswarawati, S. A. P. A., Putra, I. P. D. S., & Cahyani, N. W. (2019). Effect of Top Management Support, System Quality, and Information Quality on Satisfaction Accounting Information System Users in Lembaga Perkreditan Desa (Lpd) in Ubud District. Widya Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 1(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.32795/widyaakuntansi.v1i1.251
Ismunarti, D. H., Zainuri, M., Sugianto, D. N., & Saputra, S. W. (2020). Pengujian Reliabilitas Instrumen Terhadap Variabel Kontinu Untuk Pengukuran Konsentrasi Klorofil-a Perairan. Buletin Oseanografi Marina, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.14710/buloma.v9i1.23924
Kamarubahrin, A. F., Mohammed, A., Ayedh, A., & Khairi, K. F. (2019). Accountability Practices of Waqf Institution in Selected States in Malaysia: a Critical Analysis. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 27(2), 331–352.
Kock, N., & Gaskins, L. (2014). The Mediating Role of Voice and Accountability in the Relationship Between Internet Diffusion and Government Corruption in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Information Technology for Development, 20(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2013.832129
Koller, T., Clarke, D., & Vian, T. (2020). Promoting anti-corruption, transparency and accountability to achieve universal health coverage. Global Health Action, 13(sup1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1700660
Kuswandi. (2019). Begini Kronologi OTT Jaksa Terkait Suap Proyek Dinas PU Jogjakarta. JawaPos.Com. https://www.jawapos.com/kasuistika/01235088/begini-kronologi-ott-jaksa-terkait-suap-proyek-dinas-pu-jogjakarta
Lee, H. M., Park, J., & Nam, Y. (2020). A sustainable solution to overtourism in the social media era: An exploratory analysis on the roles and functions of place-visitor relationship (PVR). Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073043
Lustrilanang, P., Suwarno, P., Darusalam, P., Rizki, L. T., Omar, N., & Said, J. (2023). The Role of Control of Corruption and Quality of Governance in ASEAN: Evidence from DOLS and FMOLS Test. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2154060
Lykidis, I., Drosatos, G., & Rantos, K. (2021). The Use of Blockchain Technology in e-Government Services. Computers, 10(12), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10120168
Mansour, S., Wallace, S., Sadiraj, V., & Hassan, M. (2021). How do electoral and voice accountability affect corruption? Experimental evidence from Egypt. European Journal of Political Economy, 68(November 2020), 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101994
Muttaqin, I. (2019). Kontrol Pemerintah Terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Res Judicata, 2(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.29406/rj.v2i2.1749
Ngatikoh, S., Kumorotomo, W., & Retnandari, N. D. (2020). Transparency in Government: A Review on the Failures of Corruption Prevention in Indonesia. 122(Iapa), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200301.010
Ofori, E. K., Onifade, S. T., Ali, E. B., Alola, A. A., & Zhang, J. (2023). Achieving carbon neutrality in post COP26 in BRICS, MINT, and G7 economies: The role of financial development and governance indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 387, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135853
Okafor, O. N., Adebisi, F. A., Opara, M., & Okafor, C. B. (2020). Deployment of whistleblowing as an accountability mechanism to curb corruption and fraud in a developing democracy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33(6), 1335–1366. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2018-3780
Onyango, G. (2021). Whistleblowing behaviours and anti-corruption approaches in public administration in Kenya. Economic and Political Studies, 9(2), 230–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2020.1800263
Poniatowicz, M., Dziemianowicz, R., & Kargol-Wasiluk, A. (2020). Good Governance and Institutional Quality of Public Sector: Theoretical and Empirical Implications. European Research Studies Journal, XXIII(Issue 2), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1608
Pribadi, U., Iqbal, M., & Restiane, F. (2021). Factors Affecting Trust in E-Government Ulung. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 5(2), 263–276.
Purwanto, A., Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2020). Citizens’ Trust in Open Government Data: A Quantitative Study about the Effects of Data Quality, System Quality and Service Quality. The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 20, 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396958
Putri Khasanah, R., & Purwaningsih, T. (2021). Analisis Collaborative Governance Dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Psbb Pada Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19 Di Dki Jakarta Tahun 2020. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Kebijakan (JPK), 2(3), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.18196/jpk.v2i3.12792
Quah, J. S. T. (2021). Breaking the cycle of failure in combating corruption in Asian countries. Public Administration and Policy, 24(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-05-2021-0034
Quazi, R. M. (2014). Corruption and foreign direct investment in East Asia and South Asia: An econometric study. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(2), 231–242.
Rahman, A. (2022). Revisiting the Relationship between E-Government and Corruption: An Empirical Investigation. Athens Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 1–16. https://www.athensjournals.gr/social/2021-4381-AJSS-POL-Rahman-05.pdf
Rahman, A., Satispi, E., & Adiyasha, D. L. (2020). Perbandingan E-Government Antara Singapura Dan Jepang: Perspektif Determinan Dan Perannya Dalam Mengefektifkan Pemerintahan Dan Mengendalikan Korupsi. Kolaborasi : Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 6(2), 178–199.
Rama, M. dela, & Lester, M. (2019). Anti-corruption commissions: lessons for the Asia-Pacific region from a proposed Australian federal anti-corruption watchdog. Asia Pacific Business Review, 25(4), 571–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2019.1589971
Reinsberg, B., Stubbs, T., Kentikelenis, A., & King, L. (2020). Bad governance: How privatization increases corruption in the developing world. Regulation and Governance, 14(4), 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12265
Rousseau, D. (2022). Rule of Law: Access Code for a Continuous Democracy. Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria Do Direito, 14(2), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2022.142.01
Sadik-Zada, E. R., Gatto, A., & Niftiyev, I. (2022). E-government and petty corruption in public sector service delivery. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2067037
Saha, S., & Sen, K. (2021). The corruption-growth relationship: Does the political regime matter? Journal of Institutional Economics, 17(2), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000375
Saputra, R., & Dhianty, R. (2022). Investment License and Environmental Sustainability in Perspective of Law Number 11 The Year 2020 Concerning Job Creation. Administrative and Environmental Law Review, 3(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v3i1.2472
Sari, B. S. N., & Rosdianae, H. (2021). Evaluation of the Implementation of Collaborative Governance in the Optimization of DKI Jakarta Regional Tax Revenues. Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2019), 558(Aprish 2019), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210531.037
Sri, A., Yasin, Y., Anwar, A., & Sagena, U. W. (2024). Analisis Kebijakan Publik Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance. Jurnal Ilmiah Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 17(2), 410–418. https://doi.org/10.51903/kompak.v17i2.2142
Suharto, Y., & Hariadi, E. (2021). Analisis Kualitas Website Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Menggunakan Metode Webqual 4.0. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Organisasi, 12(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.29244/jmo.v12i2.33917
Sunaryo, S., & Nur, A. I. (2022). Legal Policy of Anti-Corruption Supervisor Design: A New Anti-Corruption Model in Indonesia. Bestuur, 10(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v10i2.65105
Sundari, E., & Retnowati, A. (2021). The Weakness of The Control System for Fighting Corruption in The Judicial Process: The Case of Indonesia. International Journal Of Social Policy And Law, 2(1), 93–102.
Taylor, I. W., Ullah, M. A., Koul, S., & Ulloa, M. S. (2022). Evaluating the Impact of Institutional Improvement on Control of Corruption—A System Dynamics Approach. Systems, 10(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10030064
Triatmanto, B., & Bawono, S. (2023). The interplay of corruption, human capital, and unemployment in Indonesia: Implications for economic development. Journal of Economic Criminology, 2(September), 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100031
Utomo, A. (2023). The Impact of Human Capital, and Corruption on ICOR in ASEAN Countries. EFFICIENT Indonesian Journal of Development Economics, 6(12), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.15294/efficient.v6i2.59541
Vian, T. (2020). Anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in health: concepts, frameworks, and approaches. Global Health Action, 13(sup1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1694744
Waheduzzaman, W., & Khandaker, S. (2022). E-participation for combating corruption, increasing voice and accountability, and developing government effectiveness: A cross-country data analysis. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 81(4), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12544
Wibowo, E. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Pemerintahan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Asean. Pengetahuan Dan Sikap Dalam Penelitian Kesehatan, 11150331000034, 1–147.
Wijanarko, A., & Sajili, M. (2023). Analisis Theory of Planned Behavior pada Perilaku Anti-Korupsi Mahasiswa Universitas Paramadina. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 9(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v9i1.1148
Žuffová, M. (2020). Do FOI laws and open government data deliver as anti-corruption policies? Evidence from a cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101480
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Governance and Public Policy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
With the receipt of the article by the Editorial Board of the Journal of Governance and Public Policy and it was decided to be published, then the copyright regarding the article will be diverted to Journal of Governance and Public Policy.
We hold the copyright regarding all the published articles and have the right to multiply and distribute the article under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (CC BY NC).
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM
The Copyright Transfer Agreement can be downloaded HERE.
please fill, sign, scan and send it back in PDF format to jgpp@umy.university.