The Role of Good Governance Indicators in Controlling Corruption

Authors

  • Utami Nur Master of Government Affairs and Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0047-7709
  • Dyah Mutiarin Master of Government Affairs and Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Hazel D. Jovita Department of Political Science, MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines
  • Perla P. Palomares Department of Political Science, MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines
  • Jack B. Isolana Department of Political Science, MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v12i1.22287

Keywords:

Corruption Control, Good Governance, Local Government

Abstract

Corruption control is a critical component of effective governance, particularly within local governments in Indonesia. This study examines the relationship between good governance indicators and corruption control within the local government of Yogyakarta City, Indonesia, aiming to identify key governance factors that influence anti-corruption efforts. A quantitative research approach was employed, using descriptive statistical methods to analyze data collected from questionnaires distributed to five local government agencies in Yogyakarta City. A total of 98 respondents were selected through purposive sampling. Data analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with Partial Least Squares (PLS) to assess the reliability, validity, and regression performance of the good governance indicators. Reliability was measured using Composite Reliability (CR), with values above 0.70 indicating strong reliability, and validity was assessed based on Outer Loading, with values above 0.70 considered valid. Regression analysis indicated that control of corruption, political stability, and voice and accountability significantly influence corruption control, with p-values of 0.010, 0.009, and 0.029, respectively. However, government effectiveness and the rule of law did not show a significant impact on corruption control, with p-values of 0.381 and 0.799. These findings suggest that specific governance factors, such as political stability and accountability, play a critical role in addressing corruption within local governments in Indonesia. The study introduces a novel approach by employing a quantitative SEM-PLS method to examine good governance indicators in Yogyakarta City. The findings suggest that government effectiveness and the rule of law may not have a significant influence on corruption control, challenging common assumptions in governance research.

References

Akimova, L., Litvinova, I. F., Ilchenko, H. O., Pomaza-Ponomarenko, A. L., & Yemets, O. I. (2020). The negative impact of corruption on the economic security of states. International Journal of Management, 11(5), 1058–1071.

Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021). Factors Influencing the Citizens’ Acceptance of Electronic Government. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management, 5(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijebm.5.1.5

Andhika, L. R., Nurasa, H., Karlina, N., & Candradewini, C. (2019). Innovation of Regional Participation Budgeting Through A Social Media Platform Model. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 15(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v15i2.387

Anjarbati, N., & Pribadi, U. (2022). Pengaruh Kualitas Sistem, Kualitas Informasi, Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Penggunaan Smart Government Di Kabupaten Lampung Selatan. Jurnal Caraka Prabu, 6(1), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.36859/jcp.v6i1.937

Arkorful, V. E., Lugu, B. K., Hammond, A., & Basiru, I. (2021). Decentralization and Citizens’ Participation in Local Governance: Does Trust and Transparency Matter?–An Empirical Study. Forum for Development Studies, 48(2), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2021.1872698

Arshad, S., & Khurram, S. (2020). Can government’s presence on social media stimulate citizens’ online political participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101486

Asbarini, N. F. E., Isnaini, L., & Wibowo, M. G. (2021). Pengaruh Tata Kelola Pemerintah Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di ASEAN. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 12(1), 82–93.

Asteriou, D., Pilbeam, K., & Tomuleasa, I. (2021). The impact of corruption, economic freedom, regulation and transparency on bank profitability and bank stability: Evidence from the Eurozone area. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 184, 150–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.08.023

Badaruddin, B., & Daud, A. (2022). Pengaruh pengembangan karir, kompetensi dosen dan knowledge management terhadap kinerja dosen pada ITB Nobel Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Manajemen Nobel Indonesia, 3(5), 845–857.

Bahri, M., Sakka, O., & Kallal, R. (2021). The impact of corruption on the export intensity of SMEs in Tunisia: moderating effects of political instability and regulatory obstacles. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(5), 1134–1151. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-03-2020-0055

Batalla, E. V. C. (2020). Police corruption and its control in the Philippines. Asian Education and Development Studies, 9(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-05-2018-0099

Biduri, S., Hariyanto, W., Maryanti, E., Nurasik, N., & Sartika, S. (2022). the Perspektif Theory of Planned Behavior Terhadap Intensi Pns Untuk Melakukan Whistleblowing. Media Mahardhika, 20(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.29062/mahardika.v20i2.352

Budiman, M. A., & Amyar, F. (2021). The effect of audit opinions, implementation of audit recommendations, and findings of state losses on corruption levels in the ministries and institutions of the Republic of Indonesia. Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 7(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v7i1.471

Chen, C., & Neshkova, M. I. (2020). The effect of fiscal transparency on corruption: A panel cross-country analysis. Public Administration, 98(1), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12620

Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2021). Relating e-government development to government effectiveness and control of corruption: a cluster analysis. Journal of Chinese Governance, 6(1), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2019.1698693

Chong, S. P. C., Tee, C. M., & Cheng, S. V. (2021). Political institutions and the control of corruption: a cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2020-0094

Dizrisa, D. A., Sudrajat, S., & Kusumawardani, N. (2020). Pengaruh Elemen Good Governance Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Di Asia Tenggara. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan (JAK), 25(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.23960/jak.v25i1.242

Erkkilä, T. (2020). Transparency in Public Administration. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, February, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1404

Fu, T., & Jian, Z. (2021). Corruption pays off: How environmental regulations promote corporate innovation in a developing country. Ecological Economics, 183(January), 106969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106969

Gabriel, A. G., Antonio, M. A. B., & Ramos, V. B. (2019). Transparency and Accountability in Local Governance: The Nexus Between Democracy and Public Service Delivery in the Philippines. Public Policy and Administration Research, 9(7), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.7176/PPAR/9-7-04

Hassan, S. A. (2017). Investigating the Relationship of E-Government, Control of Corruption, Economic Prosperity and Environmental Degradation: An Analysis of Asian Region. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 3(2), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.32.2002

Hue, T. H. H., & Tung-Wen Sun, M. (2022). Democratic Governance: Examining the Influence of Citizen Participation on Local Government Performance in Vietnam. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1939713

Humas DIY. (2024). Visi Anti Korupsi Turut Jadi Pandu Bagi Pemda DIY. https://jogjaprov.go.id/berita/visi-anti-korupsi-turut-jadi-pandu-bagi-pemda-diy

Indraswarawati, S. A. P. A., Putra, I. P. D. S., & Cahyani, N. W. (2019). Effect of Top Management Support, System Quality, and Information Quality on Satisfaction Accounting Information System Users in Lembaga Perkreditan Desa (Lpd) in Ubud District. Widya Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 1(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.32795/widyaakuntansi.v1i1.251

Ismunarti, D. H., Zainuri, M., Sugianto, D. N., & Saputra, S. W. (2020). Pengujian Reliabilitas Instrumen Terhadap Variabel Kontinu Untuk Pengukuran Konsentrasi Klorofil-a Perairan. Buletin Oseanografi Marina, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.14710/buloma.v9i1.23924

Kamarubahrin, A. F., Mohammed, A., Ayedh, A., & Khairi, K. F. (2019). Accountability Practices of Waqf Institution in Selected States in Malaysia: a Critical Analysis. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 27(2), 331–352.

Kock, N., & Gaskins, L. (2014). The Mediating Role of Voice and Accountability in the Relationship Between Internet Diffusion and Government Corruption in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Information Technology for Development, 20(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2013.832129

Koller, T., Clarke, D., & Vian, T. (2020). Promoting anti-corruption, transparency and accountability to achieve universal health coverage. Global Health Action, 13(sup1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1700660

Kuswandi. (2019). Begini Kronologi OTT Jaksa Terkait Suap Proyek Dinas PU Jogjakarta. JawaPos.Com. https://www.jawapos.com/kasuistika/01235088/begini-kronologi-ott-jaksa-terkait-suap-proyek-dinas-pu-jogjakarta

Lee, H. M., Park, J., & Nam, Y. (2020). A sustainable solution to overtourism in the social media era: An exploratory analysis on the roles and functions of place-visitor relationship (PVR). Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073043

Lustrilanang, P., Suwarno, P., Darusalam, P., Rizki, L. T., Omar, N., & Said, J. (2023). The Role of Control of Corruption and Quality of Governance in ASEAN: Evidence from DOLS and FMOLS Test. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2154060

Lykidis, I., Drosatos, G., & Rantos, K. (2021). The Use of Blockchain Technology in e-Government Services. Computers, 10(12), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10120168

Mansour, S., Wallace, S., Sadiraj, V., & Hassan, M. (2021). How do electoral and voice accountability affect corruption? Experimental evidence from Egypt. European Journal of Political Economy, 68(November 2020), 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101994

Muttaqin, I. (2019). Kontrol Pemerintah Terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Res Judicata, 2(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.29406/rj.v2i2.1749

Ngatikoh, S., Kumorotomo, W., & Retnandari, N. D. (2020). Transparency in Government: A Review on the Failures of Corruption Prevention in Indonesia. 122(Iapa), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200301.010

Ofori, E. K., Onifade, S. T., Ali, E. B., Alola, A. A., & Zhang, J. (2023). Achieving carbon neutrality in post COP26 in BRICS, MINT, and G7 economies: The role of financial development and governance indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 387, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135853

Okafor, O. N., Adebisi, F. A., Opara, M., & Okafor, C. B. (2020). Deployment of whistleblowing as an accountability mechanism to curb corruption and fraud in a developing democracy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33(6), 1335–1366. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2018-3780

Onyango, G. (2021). Whistleblowing behaviours and anti-corruption approaches in public administration in Kenya. Economic and Political Studies, 9(2), 230–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2020.1800263

Poniatowicz, M., Dziemianowicz, R., & Kargol-Wasiluk, A. (2020). Good Governance and Institutional Quality of Public Sector: Theoretical and Empirical Implications. European Research Studies Journal, XXIII(Issue 2), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1608

Pribadi, U., Iqbal, M., & Restiane, F. (2021). Factors Affecting Trust in E-Government Ulung. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 5(2), 263–276.

Purwanto, A., Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2020). Citizens’ Trust in Open Government Data: A Quantitative Study about the Effects of Data Quality, System Quality and Service Quality. The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 20, 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396958

Putri Khasanah, R., & Purwaningsih, T. (2021). Analisis Collaborative Governance Dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Psbb Pada Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19 Di Dki Jakarta Tahun 2020. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Kebijakan (JPK), 2(3), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.18196/jpk.v2i3.12792

Quah, J. S. T. (2021). Breaking the cycle of failure in combating corruption in Asian countries. Public Administration and Policy, 24(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-05-2021-0034

Quazi, R. M. (2014). Corruption and foreign direct investment in East Asia and South Asia: An econometric study. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(2), 231–242.

Rahman, A. (2022). Revisiting the Relationship between E-Government and Corruption: An Empirical Investigation. Athens Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 1–16. https://www.athensjournals.gr/social/2021-4381-AJSS-POL-Rahman-05.pdf

Rahman, A., Satispi, E., & Adiyasha, D. L. (2020). Perbandingan E-Government Antara Singapura Dan Jepang: Perspektif Determinan Dan Perannya Dalam Mengefektifkan Pemerintahan Dan Mengendalikan Korupsi. Kolaborasi : Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 6(2), 178–199.

Rama, M. dela, & Lester, M. (2019). Anti-corruption commissions: lessons for the Asia-Pacific region from a proposed Australian federal anti-corruption watchdog. Asia Pacific Business Review, 25(4), 571–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2019.1589971

Reinsberg, B., Stubbs, T., Kentikelenis, A., & King, L. (2020). Bad governance: How privatization increases corruption in the developing world. Regulation and Governance, 14(4), 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12265

Rousseau, D. (2022). Rule of Law: Access Code for a Continuous Democracy. Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria Do Direito, 14(2), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2022.142.01

Sadik-Zada, E. R., Gatto, A., & Niftiyev, I. (2022). E-government and petty corruption in public sector service delivery. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2067037

Saha, S., & Sen, K. (2021). The corruption-growth relationship: Does the political regime matter? Journal of Institutional Economics, 17(2), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000375

Saputra, R., & Dhianty, R. (2022). Investment License and Environmental Sustainability in Perspective of Law Number 11 The Year 2020 Concerning Job Creation. Administrative and Environmental Law Review, 3(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v3i1.2472

Sari, B. S. N., & Rosdianae, H. (2021). Evaluation of the Implementation of Collaborative Governance in the Optimization of DKI Jakarta Regional Tax Revenues. Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2019), 558(Aprish 2019), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210531.037

Sri, A., Yasin, Y., Anwar, A., & Sagena, U. W. (2024). Analisis Kebijakan Publik Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance. Jurnal Ilmiah Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 17(2), 410–418. https://doi.org/10.51903/kompak.v17i2.2142

Suharto, Y., & Hariadi, E. (2021). Analisis Kualitas Website Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Menggunakan Metode Webqual 4.0. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Organisasi, 12(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.29244/jmo.v12i2.33917

Sunaryo, S., & Nur, A. I. (2022). Legal Policy of Anti-Corruption Supervisor Design: A New Anti-Corruption Model in Indonesia. Bestuur, 10(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v10i2.65105

Sundari, E., & Retnowati, A. (2021). The Weakness of The Control System for Fighting Corruption in The Judicial Process: The Case of Indonesia. International Journal Of Social Policy And Law, 2(1), 93–102.

Taylor, I. W., Ullah, M. A., Koul, S., & Ulloa, M. S. (2022). Evaluating the Impact of Institutional Improvement on Control of Corruption—A System Dynamics Approach. Systems, 10(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10030064

Triatmanto, B., & Bawono, S. (2023). The interplay of corruption, human capital, and unemployment in Indonesia: Implications for economic development. Journal of Economic Criminology, 2(September), 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100031

Utomo, A. (2023). The Impact of Human Capital, and Corruption on ICOR in ASEAN Countries. EFFICIENT Indonesian Journal of Development Economics, 6(12), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.15294/efficient.v6i2.59541

Vian, T. (2020). Anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in health: concepts, frameworks, and approaches. Global Health Action, 13(sup1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1694744

Waheduzzaman, W., & Khandaker, S. (2022). E-participation for combating corruption, increasing voice and accountability, and developing government effectiveness: A cross-country data analysis. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 81(4), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12544

Wibowo, E. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Pemerintahan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Asean. Pengetahuan Dan Sikap Dalam Penelitian Kesehatan, 11150331000034, 1–147.

Wijanarko, A., & Sajili, M. (2023). Analisis Theory of Planned Behavior pada Perilaku Anti-Korupsi Mahasiswa Universitas Paramadina. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 9(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v9i1.1148

Žuffová, M. (2020). Do FOI laws and open government data deliver as anti-corruption policies? Evidence from a cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101480

Downloads

Published

2025-02-27

How to Cite

Nur, U., Mutiarin, D., Jovita, H. D., Palomares, P. P., & Isolana, J. B. (2025). The Role of Good Governance Indicators in Controlling Corruption. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 12(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v12i1.22287