Optimizing Public Policy Evaluation Using Data and Evidence-Based Approaches for Sunan Kuning Semarang, Indonesia Closure

Isnaeni Yuliani; Amrizarois Ismail; Ainun Nazriah; Robe'ah Yusuf

doi:10.18196/jgpp.v12i2.22299

Authors

Isnaeni Yuliani Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Law, Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia
Amrizarois Ismail Department of Infrastructure and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Science and Technology, Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata, Indonesia
Ainun Nazriah Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Indonesia
Robe'ah Yusuf Languages and Communication, Faculty of Language and Communication, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v12i2.22299

Keywords:

Public policy evaluation, Evidence-Based policy, Policy optimization, Sunan Kuning Semarang

Abstract

Since the closure of the Sunan Kuning (Argorejo) localization area in Semarang in 2019, a range of secondary issues have emerged, including not only morality concerns but also impacts on economic cycles, public health, and social structures. The closure, part of a national initiative to eliminate prostitution, aimed to address moral and health concerns but unintentionally led to challenges such as the displacement of sex workers and the shift of prostitution to online platforms. This study aims to evaluate the policy surrounding closure using Robert E. Stake’s Countenance Model (1967), which includes three stages: (1) antecedent, (2) transactions, and (3) outcomes. A qualitative approach was adopted, with purposive sampling to select stakeholders for Delphi interviews, supplemented by a literature review. Data analysis followed an interactive model comprising data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. These processes were conducted simultaneously to enable structured and focused data collection. The findings indicated that the policy has not been optimally implemented. Key recommendations include the necessity of strong political will by the government in every stage of the policy process and the importance of incorporating insights from prior research and past policy experiences. The study’s main contribution lies in developing innovative strategies for the systematic involvement of stakeholders, ensuring that public policy is both data-driven and responsive to the real-world challenges affected communities face. This research offers a novel framework for integrating qualitative policy evaluation with participatory stakeholder engagement in post-localization contexts.

References

Adam, A. (2020). Implementasi Model Penyaluran Program Bantuan Sosial Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Untuk Petani Serai Wangi Di Kabupaten Gayo Lues Provinsi Aceh. PERSPEKTIF, 9(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v9i1.2950

Amrianto, A. D., Putri, M. K. A., Yusup, A., & Putra, I. P. A. D. (2023). Kriminalisasi dan Reformulasi Perbuatan Prostitusi dalam Hukum Pidana: Catatan Kritis atas Minimnya Pengaturan Perbuatan Prostitusi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 4(2), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v4i2.18091

Amy, P., & Julius, C. (2005). How civil society organizations use evidence to influence policy processes : a literature review.

An, Y., & Liu, X. (2023). Analysis of Public Policy Formulation Process Based on Information System. 2023 International Conference on Integrated Intelligence and Communication Systems (ICIICS), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIICS59993.2023.10421426

Aragona, B., & De Rosa, R. (2019). Big data in policy making. Mathematical Population Studies, 26(2), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08898480.2017.1418113

Asmara, A. Y., & Handoyo, S. (2015). Pembuatan Kebijakan Berbasis Bukti: Studi Pada Proses Pembuatan Kebijakan Standardisasi Alat dan Mesin Pertanian di Indonesia. STI Policy and Management Journal, 13(1), 38–57.

Broman, D. (2021). Interactive Programmatic Modeling. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 20(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3431387

Cairney, P., & Oliver, K. (2020). How Should Academics Engage in Policymaking to Achieve Impact? Political Studies Review, 18(2), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918807714

Casañ, R. R., & Ariño, A. (2025). Prostitution in the Digital Age: Analyzing Data from Spanish Online Platforms. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/8xzh5

Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(4), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715614171

Cookson, R. (2005). Evidence-based policy making in health care: what it is and what it isn’t. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(2), 118–121.

Darniyus, A. A., & Warsono, H. (2020). Collaboration between Universities and Governments In Realizing Quality Policies, (Evidence-Based Policy). Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.71118

Gabby, M. (2015). Prinsip Evidence Based Policy Making Dalam Konteks Audit Pendahuluan Operasional BPJS Kesehatan. 2nd Conference in Business, Accounting, and Management 2015, 301–308.

Giest, S. (2017). Big data for policymaking: fad or fasttrack? Policy Sciences, 50(3), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9293-1

Head, B. W. (2015). Policy Analysis: Evidence Based Policy-Making. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 281–287). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.75030-6

Kilbourne, A. M., Garrido, M. M., & Brown, A. F. (2022). Translating research into policy and action. In Health Services Research (Vol. 57, Issue S1, pp. 5–8). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13980

Lasswell, H. D., & Lerner, D. (1951). The policy orientation. Communication researchers and policy–making.

Liu, S., Wang, X., Liu, M., & Zhu, J. (2017). Towards better analysis of machine learning models: A visual analytics perspective. Visual Informatics, 1(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2017.01.006

Marston, G., & Watts, R. (2003). Tampering With the Evidence: A Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based PolicyMaking. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241578701

Mergel, I., Rethemeyer, R. K., & Isett, K. (2016). Big Data in Public Affairs. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 928–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12625

Mufrohim, O. (2020). Kebijakan Hukum Penutupan Lokalisasi Sunan Kuning Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Prostitusi Online di Kota Semarang. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v3i1.992

Mufrohim, O., & Setiyono, J. (2021). Kebijakan Hukum Penutupan Lokalisasi Sunan Kuning dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Prostitusi Online Di Kota Semarang. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v4i2.2265

Muliawaty, L., & Hendryawan, S. (2020). PERANAN E-GOVERNMENT DALAM PELAYANAN PUBLIK (STUDI KASUS: MAL PELAYANAN PUBLIK KABUPATEN SUMEDANG). Kebijakan : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 11(2), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.23969/kebijakan.v11i2.2898

Naisola-Ruiter, V. (2022). The Delphi technique: a tutorial. Research in Hospitality Management, 12(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/22243534.2022.2080942

OECD Public Governance Reviews. (2020). Improving Governance with Policy Evaluation. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/89b1577d-en

Osborne, C. (2024). Part of the process: Using evidence to shape policy development. Social Policy Report, 37(1), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/sop2.33

Pandey, A., & Shukla, S. P. (2022). Analysis of Concepts Affecting the Public Policies. Middle East Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 05(02), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.46431/mejast.2022.5204

Pemerintah Kota Semarang. (2017). Naskah Akademik Penutupan Sunan Kuning Semarang.

Picard, R. G. (2020). Politics in the Pursuit of Policy Outcomes. In Media and Communications Policy Making (pp. 47–70). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35173-1_3

Prasetiamartati, B., Carden, F., Ruhanawati, S., Rakhmani, I., & Nugroho, Y. (2018). Linking academic research and policymaking. In Knowledge, Politics and Policymaking in Indonesia (pp. 13–30). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0167-4_2

Priyanto, H. (2018). Tinjauan Peraturan Bupati Nomor: 45 Tahun 2015 Tentang tata Cara Pencegahan dan Penanggulangan HIV/AIDS terhadap Perkembangan Prostitusi Kabupaten Banyuwangi. 7(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/welfare.2018.071-03

Ratnasari, D. (2017). Perilaku Kesehatan Reproduksi Pekerja Seks Komersial (Psk) Pasca Penutupan Lokalisasi Dupak Bangunsari Surabaya. Universitas Airlangga.

Rezania Dewantary, Z., Citra, A., & Larasathy Pinkan Prameshwary, N. L. (2023). Disbanding Prostitution Localization is Violating Female Sex Workers’ Rights: A Case of Indonesia. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), 8(1), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v8i1.39679

Riswanda, McIntyre-Mills, J., & Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (2017). Prostitution and Human Rights in Indonesia: A Critical Systemic Review of Policy Discourses and Scenarios. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(3), 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9393-4

Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2003). Evaluation: A systematic approach. SAGE.

Sabatier, Paul. A. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press.

Sardini, N. H., & Mukti, A. (2021). Kebijakan Penutupan Lokalisasi Sunan Kuning Kota Semarang Tahun 2019. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 11(1), 300–317.

Sarjito, A. (2024). Efektivitas Kebijakan Sosial dalam Mengurangi Ketimpangan Pendapatan dan Angka Kemiskinan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Politik Dan Humaniora, 6(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.36624/jisora.v6i2.90

Shariff, N. J. (2015). Utilizing the Delphi Survey Approach: A Review. Journal of Nursing & Care, 04(03). https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1168.1000246

Shi, J., Ai, X., & Cao, Z. (2017). Can big data improve public policy analysis? Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 552–561. https://doi.org/10.1145/3085228.3085319

Sibuea, H. Y. (2015). Penegakan Hukum Prostitusi di Indonesia. Info Singkat Hukum: Kajian Singkat Terhadap Isu Aktual Stategis, 7.

Sudarmo, S.-. (2019). Community Governance of Prostitution: Social Rehabilitation for Sex Workers through Social Capital. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 15(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v15i2.446

Sumiar, H. R. (2019). Front Matter JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik). JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 23(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.46695

Supriyanto, E. E., & Saputra, J. (2022). Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Policy Making: A Mini-Review Approach. International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.56225/ijassh.v1i2.40

Tomova, T. (2022). Managing the Policy Process: from Legitimacy to Effectiveness and Back. Filosofiya-Philosophy, 31(4), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.53656/phil2022-04-05

V Kurien, V. T., Shamsuddeen, S., Mahitha, M. C., & Rasheed, D. S. (2022). Evidence-Based Decision-Making. Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons, 10(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_5_22

Verhulst, S. G., Engin, Z., & Crowcroft, J. (2019). Data & Policy : A new venue to study and explore policy–data interaction . Data & Policy, 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2019.2

Whitford, A. (2012). The policy-making process. In Routledge Handbook of Public Policy (pp. 35–46). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097571-8

Widiharti, W., Tola, B., & Supriyat, Y. (2019). Evaluation of Principal Partnership Programs in the Directorate of Education Management - The Application of Kirkpartick and Countenance Stake Evaluation Model. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9A), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071609

Wignjosasono, K. W. (2022). Transformasi Sosial Budaya Masyarakat Pasca Pandemi Covid 19. Sebatik, 26(1), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v26i1.1855