Mapping the Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility Research (2015–2024): A Bibliometric Analysis Based on Scopus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v12i2.25936Keywords:
Corporate social responsibility, Bibliometric analysis, Research trendsAbstract
This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) research published between 2015 and 2024, drawing on 624 articles indexed in the Scopus database. The objective is to map the intellectual evolution of CSR scholarship by identifying key thematic shifts, dominant theoretical frameworks, and methodological patterns. Using VOSviewer as the primary visualization tool, the study explores research networks, keyword co-occurrences, and temporal transitions in CSR literature over the past decade. The analysis reveals a notable progression in CSR themes, moving from early emphases on business ethics and corporate governance toward sustainability, stakeholder engagement, ESG integration, and digital transformation. Stakeholder Theory, Legitimacy Theory, and Institutional Theory emerge as the most influential conceptual foundations, shaping both normative debates and strategic implementation. While quantitative approaches continue to dominate, the growing adoption of qualitative and mixed-method designs reflects a deeper inquiry into CSR’s societal relevance and ethical dimensions. Geographically, CSR research remains concentrated in developed countries such as the United States, China, the United Kingdom, and Australia, although contributions from emerging economies are steadily increasing. Despite the expansion of the field, gaps persist in the standardization of CSR metrics and in evaluating its long-term social impacts beyond corporate financial performance. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of bibliometric mapping with theoretical synthesis to provide a holistic, data-driven perspective on the evolution of CSR research over the past decade, offering fresh insights into future research directions aligned with sustainable development, inclusive governance, and cross-sector collaboration.
References
Afridi, S. A., Afsar, B., Shahjehan, A., Khan, W., Rehman, Z. U., & Khan, M. A. S. (2023). Impact of corporate social responsibility attributions on employee’s extra‐role behaviors: Moderating role of ethical corporate identity and interpersonal trust. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2017
Almutairi, A. M., & Abdelazim, S. I. (2024). The Impact of CSR on Tax Avoidance: The Moderating Role of Political Connections. Sustainability, 17(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010195
Athanasopoulou, A., Marti, E., Risi, D., & Schlindwein, E. (2025). How Companies Restrain Means–Ends Decoupling: A Comparative Case Study of CSR Implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 62(1), 214–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13043
Behnam, M., Anagnostopoulos, C., Byers, T., & Papadimitriou, D. A. (2023). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on value-in-use through customer engagement in non-profit sports clubs: the moderating role of co-production. European Sport Management Quarterly, 23(3), 789–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2021.1929375
Brinette, S., Sonmez, F. D., & Tournus, P. S. (2024). ESG Controversies and Firm Value: Moderating Role of Board Gender Diversity and Board Independence. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 4298–4307. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3236667
Cao, S., Yao, H., & Zhang, M. (2023). CSR gap and firm performance: An organizational justice perspective. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113692
Chan, T. J., Huam, H. T., Wong, S. Y., Samson, J., & Fadzilah, A. H. H. (2025). The impact of corporate social responsibility practices on customer purchase intention of clothing industry: An integration of triple bottom line and ISO2600. Decision Science Letters, 14(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2024.11.001
Choi, J. J., Kim, J., & Shenkar, O. (2023). Temporal Orientation and Corporate Social Responsibility: Global Evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 60(1), 82–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12861
Coelho, R., Jayantilal, S., & Ferreira, J. J. (2023). The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1535–1560. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2446
Cucari, N., Tutore, I., Montera, R., & Profita, S. (2023). A bibliometric performance analysis of publication productivity in the corporate social responsibility field: Outcomes of SciVal analytics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2346
Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 49–77). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n2
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Du, S., El Akremi, A., & Jia, M. (2023). Quantitative Research on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Quest for Relevance and Rigor in a Quickly Evolving, Turbulent World. Journal of Business Ethics, 187(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05297-6
Fandella, P., Sergi, B. S., & Sironi, E. (2023). Corporate social responsibility performance and the cost of capital in BRICS countries. The problem of selectivity using environmental, social and governance scores. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1712–1722. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2447
Farooq, M., Ahmed, A., Khan, I., & Munir, M. (2025). Impact of dividend policy on corporate social responsibility: the role of board governance mechanism. Journal of Global Responsibility, 16(1), 52–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-08-2023-0135
Fatima, T., & Elbanna, S. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Implementation: A Review and a Research Agenda Towards an Integrative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05047-8
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Corporate Views of the Public Interest.
Freeman, R. E. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2001). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263514
Frerichs, I. M., & Teichert, T. (2023). Research streams in corporate social responsibility literature: a bibliometric analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 73(1), 231–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00237-6
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
Gupta, P., Singh, S., Broccardo, L., & Alzeiby, E. A. (2025). Examining the link between CSR perceptions and employee advocacy through organizational justice: Can corporate hypocrisy mitigate? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2969
Hasan, M. M., & Jiang, H. (2023). Political sentiment and corporate social responsibility. The British Accounting Review, 55(1), 101170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101170
Hassan, M. K., Rabbani, M. R., Brodmann, J., Bashar, A., & Grewal, H. (2023). Bibliometric and Scientometric analysis on CSR practices in the banking sector. Review of Financial Economics, 41(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1171
He, H., & Harris, L. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of Business Research, 116, 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.030
Hu, J., Xue, N. (Iris), & Wan, L. C. (2025). When less is more: The numerical format effect of tourism corporate donations. Annals of Tourism Research, 110, 103864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2024.103864
Jiang, S., Bibi, S., Lyu, J., Khan, A., & Li, Z. (2025). Corporate social responsibility needs base philosophy: An integrative multidimensional approach to hospitality employees’ green innovative behaviors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 124, 103943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103943
Kong, D., & Liu, B. (2023). Digital Technology and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(9), 2967–2993. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2199122
Kot, S. (2023). Development insights on supply chain management in small and medium-sized enterprises. Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH.
Le, T. T. (2023). The association of corporate social responsibility and sustainable consumption and production patterns: The mediating role of green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137435
Liu, P., Tse, E. C.-Y., & He, Z. (2024). Influence of Customer Satisfaction, Trust, and Brand Awareness in Health-related Corporate Social Responsibility Aspects of Customers Revisit Intention: A Comparison between US and China. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 25(4), 700–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2022.2135163
Mariani, M. M., Al-Sultan, K., & De Massis, A. (2023). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(3), 1192–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955122
Martínez‐Falcó, J., Marco‐Lajara, B., Zaragoza‐Sáez, P., & Millán‐Tudela, L. A. (2023). Analyzing the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Green Innovation Performance in the Spanish wine industry: A structural equation modeling analysis. Agribusiness, 39(4), 985–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21820
Piantoni, G., Arena, M., & Azzone, G. (2025). Innovation ecosystems and Corporate Social Responsibility: Which dynamic capabilities are needed? Journal of Cleaner Production, 486, 144594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144594
Rau, P. R., & Yu, T. (2024). A survey on ESG: investors, institutions and firms. China Finance Review International, 14(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-12-2022-0260
Ren, S., Huang, M., Liu, D., & Yan, J. (2023). Understanding the Impact of Mandatory CSR Disclosure on Green Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms. British Journal of Management, 34(2), 576–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12609
Shah, S. H. A., Al-Ghazali, B. M., Bhatti, S., Aman, N., Fahlevi, M., Aljuaid, M., & Hasan, F. (2023). The Impact of Perceived CSR on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors: The Mediating Effects of Environmental Consciousness and Environmental Commitment. Sustainability, 15(5), 4350. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054350
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Strazzullo, S., Mauriello, R., Corvello, V., Cricelli, L., & Grimaldi, M. (2025). How open innovation can improve companies’ corporate social responsibility performance? Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 34(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12535
Uyar, A., Gerged, A. M., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2024). Do CSR performance and reporting facilitate access to debt financing in emerging markets? The role of asset structure and firm performance. Review of Accounting and Finance, 23(2), 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-01-2023-0020
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wei, Y., & Lin, C. (2025). The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility and Confucian ethics on psychological meaningfulness and employee engagement: A moderated‐mediation study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 806–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2965
Yuan, B., & Cao, X. (2022). Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability. Technology in Society, 68, 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101868
Zhang, Q., Oo, B. L., & Lim, B. T.-H. (2023). Key practices and impact factors of corporate social responsibility implementation: Evidence from construction firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(5), 2124–2154. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2020-0973
Zhao, L., Yang, M. M., Wang, Z., & Michelson, G. (2023). Trends in the Dynamic Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Leadership: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(1), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05035-y
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Governance and Public Policy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
With the receipt of the article by the Editorial Board of the Journal of Governance and Public Policy and it was decided to be published, then the copyright regarding the article will be diverted to Journal of Governance and Public Policy.
We hold the copyright regarding all the published articles and have the right to multiply and distribute the article under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (CC BY NC).
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM
The Copyright Transfer Agreement can be downloaded HERE.
please fill, sign, scan and send it back in PDF format to jgpp@umy.university.