Mapping the Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility Research (2015–2024): A Bibliometric Analysis Based on Scopus

Cristyano Cristyano; Suryadi Suryadi; Riyanto Riyanto

doi:10.18196/jgpp.v12i2.25936

Authors

Cristyano Cristyano Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Suryadi Suryadi Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Riyanto Riyanto Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v12i2.25936

Keywords:

Corporate social responsibility, Bibliometric analysis, Research trends

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) research published between 2015 and 2024, drawing on 624 articles indexed in the Scopus database. The objective is to map the intellectual evolution of CSR scholarship by identifying key thematic shifts, dominant theoretical frameworks, and methodological patterns. Using VOSviewer as the primary visualization tool, the study explores research networks, keyword co-occurrences, and temporal transitions in CSR literature over the past decade. The analysis reveals a notable progression in CSR themes, moving from early emphases on business ethics and corporate governance toward sustainability, stakeholder engagement, ESG integration, and digital transformation. Stakeholder Theory, Legitimacy Theory, and Institutional Theory emerge as the most influential conceptual foundations, shaping both normative debates and strategic implementation. While quantitative approaches continue to dominate, the growing adoption of qualitative and mixed-method designs reflects a deeper inquiry into CSR’s societal relevance and ethical dimensions. Geographically, CSR research remains concentrated in developed countries such as the United States, China, the United Kingdom, and Australia, although contributions from emerging economies are steadily increasing. Despite the expansion of the field, gaps persist in the standardization of CSR metrics and in evaluating its long-term social impacts beyond corporate financial performance. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of bibliometric mapping with theoretical synthesis to provide a holistic, data-driven perspective on the evolution of CSR research over the past decade, offering fresh insights into future research directions aligned with sustainable development, inclusive governance, and cross-sector collaboration.

References

Afridi, S. A., Afsar, B., Shahjehan, A., Khan, W., Rehman, Z. U., & Khan, M. A. S. (2023). Impact of corporate social responsibility attributions on employee’s extra‐role behaviors: Moderating role of ethical corporate identity and interpersonal trust. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2017

Almutairi, A. M., & Abdelazim, S. I. (2024). The Impact of CSR on Tax Avoidance: The Moderating Role of Political Connections. Sustainability, 17(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010195

Athanasopoulou, A., Marti, E., Risi, D., & Schlindwein, E. (2025). How Companies Restrain Means–Ends Decoupling: A Comparative Case Study of CSR Implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 62(1), 214–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13043

Behnam, M., Anagnostopoulos, C., Byers, T., & Papadimitriou, D. A. (2023). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on value-in-use through customer engagement in non-profit sports clubs: the moderating role of co-production. European Sport Management Quarterly, 23(3), 789–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2021.1929375

Brinette, S., Sonmez, F. D., & Tournus, P. S. (2024). ESG Controversies and Firm Value: Moderating Role of Board Gender Diversity and Board Independence. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 4298–4307. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3236667

Cao, S., Yao, H., & Zhang, M. (2023). CSR gap and firm performance: An organizational justice perspective. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113692

Chan, T. J., Huam, H. T., Wong, S. Y., Samson, J., & Fadzilah, A. H. H. (2025). The impact of corporate social responsibility practices on customer purchase intention of clothing industry: An integration of triple bottom line and ISO2600. Decision Science Letters, 14(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2024.11.001

Choi, J. J., Kim, J., & Shenkar, O. (2023). Temporal Orientation and Corporate Social Responsibility: Global Evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 60(1), 82–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12861

Coelho, R., Jayantilal, S., & Ferreira, J. J. (2023). The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1535–1560. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2446

Cucari, N., Tutore, I., Montera, R., & Profita, S. (2023). A bibliometric performance analysis of publication productivity in the corporate social responsibility field: Outcomes of SciVal analytics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2346

Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 49–77). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n2

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Du, S., El Akremi, A., & Jia, M. (2023). Quantitative Research on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Quest for Relevance and Rigor in a Quickly Evolving, Turbulent World. Journal of Business Ethics, 187(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05297-6

Fandella, P., Sergi, B. S., & Sironi, E. (2023). Corporate social responsibility performance and the cost of capital in BRICS countries. The problem of selectivity using environmental, social and governance scores. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1712–1722. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2447

Farooq, M., Ahmed, A., Khan, I., & Munir, M. (2025). Impact of dividend policy on corporate social responsibility: the role of board governance mechanism. Journal of Global Responsibility, 16(1), 52–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-08-2023-0135

Fatima, T., & Elbanna, S. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Implementation: A Review and a Research Agenda Towards an Integrative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05047-8

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Corporate Views of the Public Interest.

Freeman, R. E. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2001). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263514

Frerichs, I. M., & Teichert, T. (2023). Research streams in corporate social responsibility literature: a bibliometric analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 73(1), 231–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00237-6

Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889

Gupta, P., Singh, S., Broccardo, L., & Alzeiby, E. A. (2025). Examining the link between CSR perceptions and employee advocacy through organizational justice: Can corporate hypocrisy mitigate? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2969

Hasan, M. M., & Jiang, H. (2023). Political sentiment and corporate social responsibility. The British Accounting Review, 55(1), 101170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101170

Hassan, M. K., Rabbani, M. R., Brodmann, J., Bashar, A., & Grewal, H. (2023). Bibliometric and Scientometric analysis on CSR practices in the banking sector. Review of Financial Economics, 41(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1171

He, H., & Harris, L. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of Business Research, 116, 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.030

Hu, J., Xue, N. (Iris), & Wan, L. C. (2025). When less is more: The numerical format effect of tourism corporate donations. Annals of Tourism Research, 110, 103864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2024.103864

Jiang, S., Bibi, S., Lyu, J., Khan, A., & Li, Z. (2025). Corporate social responsibility needs base philosophy: An integrative multidimensional approach to hospitality employees’ green innovative behaviors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 124, 103943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103943

Kong, D., & Liu, B. (2023). Digital Technology and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(9), 2967–2993. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2199122

Kot, S. (2023). Development insights on supply chain management in small and medium-sized enterprises. Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH.

Le, T. T. (2023). The association of corporate social responsibility and sustainable consumption and production patterns: The mediating role of green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137435

Liu, P., Tse, E. C.-Y., & He, Z. (2024). Influence of Customer Satisfaction, Trust, and Brand Awareness in Health-related Corporate Social Responsibility Aspects of Customers Revisit Intention: A Comparison between US and China. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 25(4), 700–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2022.2135163

Mariani, M. M., Al-Sultan, K., & De Massis, A. (2023). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(3), 1192–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955122

Martínez‐Falcó, J., Marco‐Lajara, B., Zaragoza‐Sáez, P., & Millán‐Tudela, L. A. (2023). Analyzing the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Green Innovation Performance in the Spanish wine industry: A structural equation modeling analysis. Agribusiness, 39(4), 985–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21820

Piantoni, G., Arena, M., & Azzone, G. (2025). Innovation ecosystems and Corporate Social Responsibility: Which dynamic capabilities are needed? Journal of Cleaner Production, 486, 144594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144594

Rau, P. R., & Yu, T. (2024). A survey on ESG: investors, institutions and firms. China Finance Review International, 14(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-12-2022-0260

Ren, S., Huang, M., Liu, D., & Yan, J. (2023). Understanding the Impact of Mandatory CSR Disclosure on Green Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms. British Journal of Management, 34(2), 576–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12609

Shah, S. H. A., Al-Ghazali, B. M., Bhatti, S., Aman, N., Fahlevi, M., Aljuaid, M., & Hasan, F. (2023). The Impact of Perceived CSR on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors: The Mediating Effects of Environmental Consciousness and Environmental Commitment. Sustainability, 15(5), 4350. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054350

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Strazzullo, S., Mauriello, R., Corvello, V., Cricelli, L., & Grimaldi, M. (2025). How open innovation can improve companies’ corporate social responsibility performance? Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 34(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12535

Uyar, A., Gerged, A. M., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2024). Do CSR performance and reporting facilitate access to debt financing in emerging markets? The role of asset structure and firm performance. Review of Accounting and Finance, 23(2), 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-01-2023-0020

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Wei, Y., & Lin, C. (2025). The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility and Confucian ethics on psychological meaningfulness and employee engagement: A moderated‐mediation study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 806–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2965

Yuan, B., & Cao, X. (2022). Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability. Technology in Society, 68, 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101868

Zhang, Q., Oo, B. L., & Lim, B. T.-H. (2023). Key practices and impact factors of corporate social responsibility implementation: Evidence from construction firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(5), 2124–2154. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2020-0973

Zhao, L., Yang, M. M., Wang, Z., & Michelson, G. (2023). Trends in the Dynamic Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Leadership: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(1), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05035-y