Penggunaan Paradigma Integrasi-Interkoneksi dalam Proses Pembelajaran di Program Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Authors

  • AHMAD IZUDIN Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v13i1.4205

Keywords:

critical thinking, integrative and inter-connective paradigm, learn-ing process

Abstract

This article analyzes the utilization of integrative and inter-connective con-cepts in the learning process of Islamic studies at the graduate program in State Islamic University of Sunan Kalijaga. This study explores the experiences of lec-turers and students at the interdisciplinary Islamic studies at the graduate pro-gram. Based on the interview and observation, the author highlights two types of learning processes. First, lecturer at UIN Sunan Kalijaga have inserted notions integrative and inter-connective concepts as well as Islamic values and interdisci-plinary approach in their syllabus and learning plan. Second, students have given various responses to the way lecturers teach in the class. According to students, lecturers graduated from western educational institutions, either Europe or America, stimulated students to think critically use interdisciplinary approach in resolving the problems. There are also some lecturers who use a normative ap-proach in conceiving the debates and critical thinking in Islamic studies.

References

Abdullah, M. Amin. 2012. Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Abdullah, M. Amin, dkk. 2006. Kerangka Dasar Keilmuan dan Pengembangan Kurikulum Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga. Yogyakarta: Pokja Akademik UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Abdullah, M. Amin. 2006. Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Abdullah, M. Amin, dkk. 2003. Rekonstruksi Metodologi Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman.

Yogyakarta: Suka-Press.

al-Farabi. Ihsha al-‘Ulum. Paris: Dar Biblion.

Al-Ghazali. Ihya ‘Ulum al-Din, juz 1.

Ali, Mukti. 1987. Beberapa Persoalan Agama Dewasa Ini. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. Ali, Mukti. 1991. Memahami Beberapa Aspek Ajaran Islam. Bandung: Mizan. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Cetakan
ke-12. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Ausburg, Tanya. 2006. Becoming Interdisciplinary: An Introduction to Interdiscipli-

nary Studies, 2nd edition. New York: Hunt Publishing.

Bakar, Osman. 1992. Classification of Knowlwdge in Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Insti-tute for Policy Reaserch.

Benson, C. Thomas. 1982. “Five Argument Againts Interdisciplinary Studies.” Issues in Integrative Studies, No. 1.

Biber and Leavy. 2006. The Practice of Qualititative Research. Thousand Oak. Cali-fornia: Sage Publication.

Creswell, J.W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Reseacrh Design: Choosing Among Five

Traditions. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.

Faiz, Fahrudin. 2007. “Mengawal Perjalanan Sebuah Paradigma” dalam Fahrudin Faiz (ed.), Islamic Studies dalam Paradigma Integrasi-Interkoneksi. Yogyakarta: SUKA Press.

Ibn Khaldun, Muqaddimah, terj. Franz Rozenth.

Kartanegara, Mulyadi. 2005. Integrasi Ilmu. Bandung: Arasy Mizan.

Klein, J. T., & Newell, W.H. 1997. “Advancing Interdisciplinary Studies” in Jerry Gaff & James Ratcliff (eds.). Handbook of the Undergraduate Curriculum: A Comprehensive Guide tu Purposes, Structure, Practices and Change. (San Francisco: Josse –Bass.

Klein, Julie Thompson. 1990. Interdisciplinarity; History, Theory and Practice. De-troit: Wayne State University.

Madjid, Nurcholis. 2000. Islam Doktrin dan Peradaban Sebuah Telaah Kritis tentang Masalah Keimanan, Kemanusiaan, dan Kemodernan. Jakarta: Yayasan Wakaf Paramadina.

Mansilla, Veronica Boix. 2005. “Assessing Student Work at Disciplinary Cross-road”. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning.

Merriam, S.B. 2002. Qualitative Reseacrh in Practice: Example for Duscussion and

Analisys. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.

Miles and Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analisys. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

Moran, Joe. 2010. Interdisciplinary (The New Critical Idiom). New York: Routledge.

Moran, Lexy J. X. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasution, Harun. 2001. “Klasifikasi Ilmu dan Tradisi Penelitian Islam: Sebuah Perspektif,” dalam M. Deden Ridwan (Ed.). Tradisi Baru Penelitian Agama Is-lam: Tinjauan Antardisiplin Ilmu. Bandung: Yayasan Nuansa Cendekia.

Repko, f. Allen. 2010. Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. Routledge. Siswanto. 2013. “Perspektif Amin Abdullah Tentang Integrasi Interkoneksi dalam

Kajian Islam”, Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam, Volume 3 Nomor 2 Desember.

Stake, R.E. 1995. The Art of Case Study. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication. Stember, M. 1991. “Advancing the Social Sciences through the Interdisciplinary
Enterprise”. The Social Science Journal, 28(1).

Sugiyono. 2013. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprayoga, Iman dan Tobroni. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial-Agama. Bandung:

PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-22

How to Cite

IZUDIN, A. (2017). Penggunaan Paradigma Integrasi-Interkoneksi dalam Proses Pembelajaran di Program Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 13(1), 110–140. https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v13i1.4205

Issue

Section

Articles