Motif Da’i Berdakwah di Kota Ambon

Authors

  • SULAEMAN SULAEMAN Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ambon
  • IRTA SULASTRI Universitas Islam Negeri Padang,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v13i2.4211

Keywords:

Preaching, preacher motive, social action and symbolic perspec-tive.

Abstract

This paper describes and explains the self experience of motive behind the preacher choosing to preach. Preaching experiences in Ambon City still get scorn, insult, ridicule from multicultural environment. Environment treats them with apathy, lack of acceptance, recognition, and less respected in preaching. The preacher conveys communication message of Islam, it is still not able to open mind and awareness, in fact, there are many muslims still follow their ancestor doctrines and cannot think crtically. Messages of religious communication should be communicated sympathetically and rationally. This research used subjective interpretive method with phenomenology approach. Researchers explored self experience preacher, conducted by using data collection through in-depth inter-views and participatory observation with supporting data based on social action perspective. The results showed that the subject interpreted himself choosing preacher as profession for reason and purpose motive in preaching communica-tion. Preacher communication action is not “single,” there is another phenom-enon shows the double motive of preaching, though the phenomenon is not likely to appear.

References

Abdulkhaliq, Abdurrahman. 1998. Metode dan Strategi Dakwah Islam. Jakarta:

Pustaka al-Kautsar.

——————. 1991. Dasar-Dasar Dakwah: Generasi Islam Pertama. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Hidayah.

Ahmad, A.S., (Makalah) “Dakwah-Misi dan Komunikasi”. Disajikan pada Lokakarya Ilmu Komunikasi Jurusan Komunikasi UNHAS Makassar, 28 Mei 2000.
al-Qur’an dan Terjemahnya.

Arifin, Anwar. 2011. Dakwah Kontemporer: Sebuah Studi Komunikasi. Jakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Annuar, M. F. Adam dan Ali AH. 2014. “The Use of Blog as a Medium of Is-lamic Da’wah in Malaysia.” International Journal of Sustainable Human Develop-ment, 2 (2), pp. 74-80.

Berger, Peter Ludwiq and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in The Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books. ——————. 1990. Tafsir Sosial Atas Kenyataan: Risalah Tentang Sosiologi Pengetahuan.

Terjemahan Hasan Basari. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Bukhari. 2009. “Dakwah Ahlulbait Kajian Kang Jalal.” Disertasi. Universitas Is-lam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.

Burns, R.B. 1979. The Self Concept in Theory, Measurement, Development and Behav-ior. London: Longman Group Limited.

Creswell, John W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among

Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: CA. Sage Publication Inc.

Given, M. Lisa. 2008. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Vol-ume 1 and 2. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

Ilaihi, Wahyu. 2010. Komunikasi Dakwah. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Kusnawan, Aep. 2004. Ilmu Dakwah (Kajian Berbagai Aspek). Bandung: Pustaka Bani Quraisy.

Kuswarno, Engkus. 2009. Fenomenologi, Metodologi Penelitian Komunikasi, Konsepsi, Pedoman, dan Contoh Penelitian. Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.

Lindlof, Thomas R. 1995. Qualitative Communication Research Methods, Califor-nia USA, Sage Publications.

Little John, W. Stephen and Karen A. Foss. 2009. Encyclopedia of Communication Theories. University of New Mexico: SAGE Reference Publication, In.

Mahadi, Ujan. 2012. “Komunikasi Dakwah Kaum Migran-Studi Komunikasi Antar Budaya dengan Pendekatan Fenomenologi pada Dai Kaum Migran dalam Dakwah Islam di Kota Bengkulu.” Disertasi, Program Studi Ilmu

Komunikasi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung. Ma’arif, S. Bambang. 2010. Komunikasi Dakwah: Paradigma Untuk Aksi. Cet. I,

Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moustakas, Clark. 1994. Phenomenological Research Methods. London: Sage Publi-cations.

Mulkan, Abdul Munir. 1996. Idiologisasi Gerakan Dakwah-Episode Kehidupan M.

Natsir dan Ahmad Azhar Basyir. Yogyakarta: Sipress.

Mulkan, Dede. 2014. “Islamic Preaching (Da’wa) Portrait In Television (Indone-sian Cases).” The International Journal of Social Sciences (TIJOSS). Vol.19 No.1, ISSN 2305-4557, pp. 176-189.

Mulyana, Deddy. 2010. Metode penelitian Kualitatif, Paradigma Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

———,. 2015. Komunikasi Media dan Masyarakat: Membedah Absurditas Budaya Indo-

nesia. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Radford, Gary. P. 2005. On The Philosophy of Communication. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Schutz, Alfred. 1972. The Phenomenology of the Social World. London: Heinemann Educational Book.

Sulaeman. 2014. “Konstruksi Makna dan Perilaku Komunikasi Penyandang Oligodaktili: Studi Fenomenologi Penyandang Oligodaktili di Kampung Ulutaue Kabupaten Bone.” Disertasi, Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Pro-gram Pascasarjana Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung.
Supartra, Munzier. 2003. Metode Dakwah. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Syahputra, Iswandi. 2007. Komunikasi Profetik-Konsep dan Pendekatannya. Bandung:

Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Syaiful Ma’arif, Bambang. 2008. “Pola Komunikasi Dakwah KH. Abdullah Gymnastiar dan KH. Jalaluddin Rakhmat dalam Membina Kehidupan Beragama Jemaahnya di Bandung.” Disertasi, Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung.

West, R., & Turner, L. H. 2007. Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and

Application. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

Wood, Julia T. 1997. Communication Theories In Action. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-09

How to Cite

SULAEMAN, S., & SULASTRI, I. (2017). Motif Da’i Berdakwah di Kota Ambon. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 13(2), 240–264. https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v13i2.4211

Issue

Section

Articles