Email this article 
Behavior dynamics faultline in auditing educator: role conflict, proactive personality, and group switching in standards acceptance
Abstract
Research aims: This study investigates auditing educators’ (AE) behavior in switching to accounting standard acceptance's fault lines and achieving task performance due to role conflicts and proactive personalities.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This research used a 2X2 matrix to categorize role conflict (high vs. low) and proactive personality (transform vs. confront). Then, the data were processed using the ANOVA difference test.
Research findings: This study uncovered that AEs with high-role conflict and confront-proactive personalities intend to switch to another group. This research firstly intersects the constructive factors of the role conflict’s level and proactive personalities to explain the AEs’ switching intentions and performance achievement behavior. It also indicates that role conflict could affect AEs’ switching intentions and whether proactive personalities occupy the group memberships. Secondly, this study considers whether the broaden-and-build theory can explain the combination of (high-low) role conflict and (confront-transform) proactive characters. Finally, it describes different AE behaviors when switching intention and achieving the desired task performance. Thirdly, the authors revealed the AEs’ behavior in setting an accounting standard acceptance fault line, an open group that AEs choose due to personal goals.
Theoretical Contribution/Originality: This research contributes to the two conceptual contents of role conflict and proactive personalities and accounts for the broaden-and-build theory. Therefore, the fault lines’ members would maintain their membership in a group with positive emotions.
Practitioner/Policy Implications: This research implies that group development should include shared emotional values as an antecedent factor for group cohesiveness.
Research limitation: The limitation of this study is that the members of the matrix design fault lines did not consider regulations to limit their behavior.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abramis, D. J. (1994). Work role ambiguity, job satisfaction, and job performance: Meta-analyses and review. Psychological Reports, 75(3_suppl), 1411-1433. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.75.3f.1411
Aggarwal, I., & Woolley, A. W. (2013). Do you see what I see? The effect of members’ cognitive styles on team processes and errors in task execution. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 122(1), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.04.003
Alikaj, A., Ning, W., & Wu, B. (2021). Proactive personality and creative behavior: examining the role of thriving at work and high-involvement HR practices. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(5), 857-869. https://doi.org/0.1007/s10869-020-09704-5
Allen, D. G., Weeks, K. P., & Moffitt, K. R. (2005). Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: the moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 980. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.980
Antino, M., Rico, R., & Thatcher, S. M. (2019). Structuring reality through the faultlines lens: The effects of structure, fairness, and status conflict on the activated faultlines–performance relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1444-1470. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0054
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human relations, 65(10), 1359-1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of organizational behavior, 14(2), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202
Bendersky, C., & Hays, N. A. (2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23(2), 323-340. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0734
Bezrukova, K., Spell, C. S., Caldwell, D., & Burger, J. M. (2016). A multilevel perspective on faultlines: Differentiating the effects between group-and organizational-level faultlines. Journal of applied psychology, 101(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000039
Bhattacherjee, A., Limayem, M., & Cheung, C. M. (2012). User switching of information technology: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test. Information & Management, 49(7-8), 327-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.06.002
Braun, M. T., Kozlowski, S. W., Brown, T. A., & DeShon, R. P. (2020). Exploring the dynamic team cohesion–performance and coordination–performance relationships of newly formed teams. Small group research, 51(5), 551-580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420907157
Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 62(3), 713. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044721
Calvo-Porral, C., & Lévy-Mangin, J.-P. (2015). Switching behavior and customer satisfaction in mobile services: Analyzing virtual and traditional operators. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 532-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.057
Chen, H., Jiao, J., Yang, N., & Wang, X.-H. (2021). How identity conflict and identity synergy influence innovative performance of employees with multiple team membership. Psychological Reports, 124(2), 792-808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120916863
Cooper, D., Patel, P. C., & Thatcher, S. M. (2014). It depends: Environmental context and the effects of faultlines on top management team performance. Organization Science, 25(2), 633-652. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0855
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of management, 26(3), 435-462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304
DeLeskey, K. (2003). Factors affecting nurses' decisions to join and maintain membership in professional associations. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 18(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1053/jpan.2003.18030008
Dey, B. L., Al-Karaghouli, W., Minov, S., Babu, M. M., Ayios, A., Mahammad, S. S., & Binsardi, B. (2020). The Role of Speed on Customer Satisfaction and Switching Intention: A Study of the UK Mobile Telecom Market. Information Systems Management, 37(1), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1696526
Dwivedi, Y. K., Papazafeiropoulou, A., Brinkman, W.-P., & Lal, B. (2010). Examining the influence of service quality and secondary influence on the behavioural intention to change internet service provider. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(2), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9074-7
Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and economic behavior, 54(2), 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of general psychology, 2(3), 300-319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). The value of positive emotions: The emerging science of positive psychology is coming to understand why it's good to feel good. American scientist, 91(4), 330-335. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27858244
Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367-1377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512
Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological science, 13(2), 172-175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00431
Fredrickson, B. L., Mancuso, R. A., Branigan, C., & Tugade, M. M. (2000). The undoing effect of positive emotions. Motivation and emotion, 24(4), 237-258. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010796329158
George, J. M. (1995). Asymmetrical effects of rewards and punishments: The case of social loafing. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68(4), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1995.tb00591.x
Ghorpade, J., Lackritz, J., & Singh, G. (2011). Personality as a moderator of the relationship between role conflict, role ambiguity, and burnout. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1275-1298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00763.x
Greguras, G. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2010). Why does proactive personality predict employee life satisfaction and work behaviors? A field investigation of the mediating role of the self‐concordance model. Personnel Psychology, 63(3), 539-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01180.x
Hogg, M. A., & Hardie, E. A. (1992). Prototypicality, conformity and depersonalized attraction: A self‐categorization analysis of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1992.tb00954.x
Homan, A. C., Van Kleef, G. A., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2016). Team members’ emotional displays as indicators of team functioning. Cognition and Emotion, 30(1), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1039494
Horne, C. (2001). The enforcement of norms: Group cohesion and meta-norms. Social psychology quarterly, 253-266. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090115
Hsieh, J.-K., Hsieh, Y.-C., Chiu, H.-C., & Feng, Y.-C. (2012). Post-adoption switching behavior for online service substitutes: A perspective of the push–pull–mooring framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1912-1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.010
Huang, C.-C. (2009). Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(11), 786-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.003
Hung, W.-H., Chen, K., & Lin, C.-P. (2015). Does the proactive personality mitigate the adverse effect of technostress on productivity in the mobile environment? Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.06.002
Jehn, K. A., & Bezrukova, K. (2010). The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 112(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.008
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative science quarterly, 44(4), 741-763. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667054
Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86(1), 99-130. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2974
Kianto, A., Vanhala, M., & Heilmann, P. (2016). The impact of knowledge management on job satisfaction. Journal of knowledge management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0398
Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1995). " The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception": Correction. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.579
Lai, F.-Y., Lin, C.-C., Lu, S.-C., & Chen, H.-L. (2021). The Role of Team–Member Exchange in Proactive Personality and Employees’ Proactive Behaviors: The Moderating Effect of Transformational Leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15480518211034847. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211034847
Lam, A., & Lambermont‐Ford, J. P. (2010). Knowledge sharing in organisational contexts: a motivation‐based perspective. Journal of knowledge management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015561
Lam, W., Lee, C., Taylor, M. S., & Zhao, H. H. (2018). Does proactive personality matter in leadership transitions? Effects of proactive personality on new leader identification and responses to new leaders and their change agendas. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0503
Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533229
Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (2005). Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 645-659. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17843943
Lee, P., Gillespie, N., Mann, L., & Wearing, A. (2010). Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. Management learning, 41(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507610362036
Liang, D., Ma, Z., & Qi, L. (2013). Service quality and customer switching behavior in China's mobile phone service sector. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1161-1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.03.012
Liu, M.-L., Hsieh, M.-W., Hsiao, C., Lin, C.-P., & Yang, C. (2020). Modeling knowledge sharing and team performance in technology industry: the main and moderating effects of happiness. Review of Managerial Science, 14(3), 587-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0301-4
Liu, Y., Li, H., Xu, X., Kostakos, V., & Heikkilä, J. (2016). Modeling consumer switching behavior in social network games by exploring consumer cognitive dissonance and change experience. Industrial Management & Data Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2015-0170
Long, J. H., Mertins, L., & Vansant, B. (2015). The Effects of Firm-Provided Measure Weightings on Evaluators' Incorporation of Non-Contractible Information. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50837
Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological bulletin, 64(4), 259. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022386
Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of applied psychology, 91(4), 927. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.927
Martins, L. L., Schilpzand, M. C., Kirkman, B. L., Ivanaj, S., & Ivanaj, V. (2013). A contingency view of the effects of cognitive diversity on team performance: The moderating roles of team psychological safety and relationship conflict. Small group research, 44(2), 96-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412466921
McCormick, B. W., Guay, R. P., Colbert, A. E., & Stewart, G. L. (2019). Proactive personality and proactive behaviour: Perspectives on person–situation interactions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(1), 30-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12234
McGowan, M., Shiu, E., & Hassan, L. M. (2017). The influence of social identity on value perceptions and intention. Journal of consumer behaviour, 16(3), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1627
Mello, A. L., & Rentsch, J. R. (2015). Cognitive diversity in teams: A multidisciplinary review. Small group research, 46(6), 623-658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496415602558
Molleman, E. (2005). Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning? Group decision and Negotiation, 14(3), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-6490-7
Nason, R. S., Bacq, S., & Gras, D. (2018). A behavioral theory of social performance: Social identity and stakeholder expectations. Academy of Management Review, 43(2), 259-283. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0081
Nordbäck, E. S., & Espinosa, J. A. (2019). Effective coordination of shared leadership in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(1), 321-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1558943
Norris, D. R., & Niebuhr, R. E. (1984). Professionalism, organizational commitment and job satisfaction in an accounting organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(84)90029-1
Onyemah, V. (2008). Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and Performance: Empirical Evidence of an Inverted‑U Relationship. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 28(3), 299-313. https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134280306
Ou, A. Y., Seo, J., Choi, D., & Hom, P. W. (2017). When can humble top executives retain middle managers? The moderating role of top management team faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1915-1931. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1072
Pan, J., Liu, S., Ma, B., & Qu, Z. (2018). How does proactive personality promote creativity? A multilevel examination of the interplay between formal and informal leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(4), 852-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12221
Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615-631. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.6.615
Qi, M., & Armstrong, S. J. (2019). The influence of cognitive style diversity on intra-group relationship conflict, individual-level organizational citizenship behaviors and the moderating role of leader-member-exchange. International Journal of Conflict Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-09-2018-0105
Ren, H., Gray, B., & Harrison, D. A. (2015). Triggering faultline effects in teams: The importance of bridging friendship ties and breaching animosity ties. Organization Science, 26(2), 390-404. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0944
Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 150-163. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391486
Roth, J., Steffens, M. C., & Vignoles, V. L. (2018). Group membership, group change, and intergroup attitudes: a recategorization model based on cognitive consistency principles. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 479. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00479
Rowley, T., Balk, J., Guo, J.-W., & Wallace, A. S. (2020). Factors influencing nurse practitioners' decisions to join nurse practitioner associations. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 32(2), 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000231
Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of applied psychology, 84(3), 416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416
Shin, S. J., Kim, T.-Y., Lee, J.-Y., & Bian, L. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0270
Srivastava, K., & Sharma, N. K. (2013). Service quality, corporate brand image, and switching behavior: The mediating role of customer satisfaction and repurchase intention. Services Marketing Quarterly, 34(4), 274-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2013.827020
Sriwidharmanely, S., Sumiyana, S., Mustakini, J. H., & Nahartyo, E. (2021). Encouraging positive emotions to cope with technostress’s adverse effects: insights into the broaden-and-build theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1955008
Sumiyana, S., & Sriwidharmanely, S. (2020). Mitigating the harmful effects of technostress: inducing chaos theory in an experimental setting. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(10), 1079-1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1641229
Tasheva, S., & Hillman, A. J. (2019). Integrating diversity at different levels: Multilevel human capital, social capital, and demographic diversity and their implications for team effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 746-765. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0396
Thatcher, S., & Patel, P. C. (2011). Demographic faultlines: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of applied psychology, 96(6), 1119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024167
Tian, Y., Tuttle, B. M., & Xu, Y. (2016). Using incentives to overcome the negative effects of faultline conflict on individual effort. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 28(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51147
Turner, J. C. (2010). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior.
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x
Van Kleef, G. A., & Fischer, A. H. (2016). Emotional collectives: How groups shape emotions and emotions shape groups. Cognition and Emotion, 30(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1081349
Van Peteghem, M., Bruynseels, L., & Gaeremynck, A. (2018). Beyond diversity: A tale of faultlines and frictions in the board of directors. The Accounting Review, 93(2), 339-367. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51818
Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Thomas, C. L., Yu, J., & Spitzmueller, C. (2017). Explaining benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of engagement, team proactivity composition and perceived organizational support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 101, 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.04.002
Yousef, D. A. (2000). The interactive effects of role conflict and role ambiguity on job satisfaction and attitudes toward organizational change: A moderated multiple regression approach. International Journal of Stress Management, 7(4), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009593913606
Zhang, A., Li, X., & Guo, Y. (2021). Proactive Personality and Employee Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Model of Multisource Information Exchange and LMX. Frontiers in psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.552581
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v25i2.20853
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Office:
Ruang Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMY
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id
Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
View My Stats