EFEKTIVITAS TIPE-TIPE SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA DI INDONESIA

Nenny Hendajany

Abstract


Abstract: Public schools in Indonesia has the advantage of better student input. Almost all secondary schools in the country, especially big cities limit the national test scores (formerly pure Ebtanas value) Primary School as a condition of entry. This paper uses data from IFLS3 and IFLS4 which form the polling cross section for the estimation of the effectiveness of education junior high school in Indonesia. Measures of effectiveness are earnings in the labor market. Empirical results show that the log earnings in the labor market for graduates of public schools is higher than 13.3 percent of graduates of private secular and 30.8 percent higher than the Islamic private school graduates. As for the non-Islamic private school graduates although not significant, but has a positive sign or higher compared to public school graduates. These results do not involve selection bias, involving the presence of selection bias after log earnings differences between graduates of public schools with private graduates enjoyed by graduates of private higher by 51.9 percent, the difference in log earnings between graduates of public schools with graduates of Islamic private higher enjoyed by the country graduate amounted to 84.5 percent, while for log income difference between public school graduates with graduates of other private higher enjoyed by other private graduates by 76.1 percent, although not significantly.

Abstrak: Sekolah negeri di Indonesia memiliki keuntungan dalam input siswa yang lebih baik. Hampir seluruh sekolah menengah pertama negeri khususnya di kota besar membatasi nilai ujian nasional (dahulu nilai ebtanas murni) Sekolah Dasar sebagai syarat masuk. Paper ini menggunakan data IFLS3 dan IFLS4 yang membentuk polling cross section untuk es­timasi efektivitas pendidikan sekolah menengah pertama di Indonesia. Ukuran efekti­vitas yang diambil adalah pendapatan di pasar tenaga kerja. Hasil empiris memperlihatkan bahwa log pendapatan di pasar tenaga kerja bagi lulusan sekolah negeri lebih tinggi 13,3 persen diban­dingkan lulusan swasta sekuler dan 30,8 persen lebih tinggi dibandingkan lulusan sekolah swasta Islam. Sementara untuk lulusan sekolah swasta non Islam meskipun tidak signifikan tetapi memiliki tanda positif atau lebih tinggi dibandingkan lulusan sekolah negeri. Hasil tersebut belum melibatkan selection bias, setelah melibatkan adanya selection bias perbedaan log pendapatan antara lulusan sekolah negeri dengan lulusan swasta dinikmati lebih tinggi oleh lulusan swasta sebesar 51,9 persen, perbedaan log pendapatan antara lulusan sekolah negeri dengan lulusan swasta Islam dinikmati lebih tinggi oleh lulusan negeri sebesar 84,5 persen, sementara untuk perbedaan log pendapatan antara lulusan sekolah negeri dengan lulusan swasta lain dinikmati lebih tinggi oleh lulusan swasta lain sebesar 76,1 persen walau tidak signifikan.

 


Keywords


public schools; private schools; private islamic schools; non-islamic religious private schools

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bedi, A., and Garg, A. (2000). The effectiveness of private versus public schools: the case of Indonesia. Journal of Development Econo¬mics 61(2):463-94.

Card, D. and Krueger, A. (1994). The economic return to school quality: A partial survey. Working Papers 713, Princeton Univer¬sity, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section.

Cox, D., and Jimenez, E., (1991). The relative effectiveness of private and public schools: evidence from two developing countries. Journal of Development Econo-mics 34(l-2), pp 99-121.

Evans, W.N., Schwab, R.M., (1995). Finishing high school and starting college: do catholic school sma a difference? Quart-erly Journal of Economics 105, 941–974.

Fahmi, M., (2009a). The effectiveness of private versus public schools in Indonesia: Com¬ment, working paper in Economics and Development Studies Padjadjaran Univer¬sityNo. 200913.

Fahmi, M., (2009b). School choice and earnings: a case of Indonesia, working paper in Economics and Development Studies Padjadjaran University No. 200914.

Figlio, D.N., Stone, J.A., (1997). School choice and student performance, Are private schools reallybetter? Discussion Paper No. 1141-97, Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madi-son.

James, Estelle, Elizabeth King, and Asep Surya¬hadi. (1996). Finance, management and costs of public and private schools in Indonesia. Economics of Education Review 15(4): 387-398.

Jann, B., (2008). A stata implementation of the Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition. ETH Zurich Sociology Working Paper No. 5

Kim, Y., Liu, C., dan Rhee, S.G. (2003). The effect of firm size on earning manage-ment. Journal College of Business Adminis-tration University of Hawai.Vol. 6 pp. 1-30.

Lee, L.F., (1983). Generalized econometric models with selectivity. Econometrica Vol 51 No.2, pp 507-512.

Medoff, J.L., Abraham, K.G., (1980). Experience, performance and earnings, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. XCV, No. 4, pp. 703-736.

Neal, D., (1997). The effect of catholic secondary schooling on educational attainment. Jour¬nal of LaborEconomics 15, 98–123.

Newhouse, D., Beegle, K., (2006). The effect of school type on academic achievement: evi¬dence from Indonesia. Journal of Human Resources, Vol 41. No.3, 529 – 557

Oaxaca, R., (1973). Male–female differentials in urban labor markets. International Econo-mic Review 3, 693–709.

Reimers, C. W. (1983). Labor market discrimi-nation against hispanic and black men. The Review of Economics and Statistics 65: 570–579

Strauss, John, Kathleen Beegle, Agus Dwiyanto, Yulia Herawati, Daan Pattinasarany, Elan Satriawan, Bondan Sikoki, Sukamdi, Firman Witoelar. (2004). Indonesian living standards: before and after the financial crisis. Rand Corporation, USA, and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan




 

Office:
Redaksi JESP UMY, Gedung E2 Lantai 2, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Jalan Brawijaya, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55183
Telp: (0274) 387656 ext.184
Fax: (0274) 387646
Email: jesp@umy.ac.id


Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan (JESP) is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.