MAMPUKAH PDB HIJAU MENGAKOMODASI DEGRADASI LINGKUNGAN DAN KESEJAHTERAAN MASYARAKAT?

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Apr 1, 2009
Keywords:
Green GDP, chocolate GDP, welfare society, environmental degradation

Main Article Content

Suryanto .
Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Abstract

Economic theories, especially theories of development evolves from the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to the sustainable economic development. But the scenario toward economic sustainability is still characterized various opinions on the implementation of green GDP. There is the notion that environmental impacts will be reduced automatically if the level of public welfare has been achieved. While other opinion says that there is no positive relationship between economic growth by improving environmental quality. This paper presents the arguments of these two opinions. This paper concludes with reviews of green GDP concept is associated with environmental degradation, and welfare of the community. Green GDP growth rates have economic consequences that low since corrected by environmental constraints. However, improved environmental quality and provide hope for humans to live sustainable. Problem that must be addressed along with the implementation of green GDP is to do redefinition of welfare.

 

Article Details

How to Cite
., S. (2009). MAMPUKAH PDB HIJAU MENGAKOMODASI DEGRADASI LINGKUNGAN DAN KESEJAHTERAAN MASYARAKAT?. Jurnal Ekonomi &Amp; Studi Pembangunan, 10(1), 99–109. Retrieved from https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/esp/article/view/1278
Issue
JESP Volume 10 Nomor 1, April 2009
Section
Articles

License

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., Jansson, B.-O., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Perrings, C., & Pimentel, D. 1995. Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment. Science, 268, 520-521.

Arsyad, Lincoln, 1988. Ekonomi Pembangunan, Yogyakarta: Bagian Penerbitan STIE YKPN.

Askary, M. 2003. “Valuasi Ekonomi dalam Kebijakan Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Hidup”. Dipresentasikan pada Seminar Nasional III Neraca Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan di Baturraden, Purwokerto pada 12-14 Desember 2003.

Beckerman, W. 1992. Economic Growth and the Environment: Whose Growth! Whose Environment? World Development, 20, 481-496.

Bhagwati, J. 1993. The Case for Free Trade, Scientific American (pp. 42-49).

Daly, H. E. 1977. Steady-state Economics: the Economics of Biophysical Equilibrium and Moral Growth. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

Djojohadikusumo, Sumitro, 1981. Indonesia dalam Perkembangan Dunia: Kini dan Masa Datang, Jakarta: LP3ES.

Ekins, P. 1997. The Kuznets Curve for the Environment and Economic Growth: Examining the Evidence. Environment and Planning A, pp. 29.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Hettige, H., Lucas, R. E. B., & Wheeler, D. 1992. The Toxic Intensity of Industrial Production: Global Patterns, Trends and Trade Policy. American Economic Review, 82,478-481.

Hettige, H., Mani, M., & Wheeler, D. 1997. Industrial Pollution in Economic Development: Kuznets revisited. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, Development Research Group.

Munasinghe, M and Cruz, W. 1995. “Economy wide Policies and the Environment: Lesson from Experience”, World Bank Environment Paper No 10.

Panayotou, T. 1993. Empirical tests and policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development. Geneva: International Labor Office, Technology and Employment Programme.

Stagl, Sigrid, 1999. Delinking Economic Growth From Environmental Degradation? A Literature Survey on the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien (Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration). Wiena.

Stern, D. I., Common, M. S., & Barbier, E. B. 1996. Economic growth and Environmental Degradation: The environmental Kuznets Curve and Sustainable Development. World Development, 24, 1151-1160.

Suhartono, Suparlan. 2005. Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan, Jogjakarta: AR Ruzz.

Suparmoko. 2006. PDRB Hijau (Konsep Dan Metodologi), Materi disampaikan pada Pelatihan Penyusunan PDRB Hijau dan Perencanaan Kehutanan Berbasis Penataan Ruang, Jakarta.

Suparmoko dan Maria R Suparmoko, 2000. “Ekonomika Lingkungan”, Edisi pertama,Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Todaro. M.P .1994. Pembangunan Ekonomi di Dunia Ketiga. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.