APLIKASI INDIVIDUAL TRAVEL COST METHOD DI AREA PUBLIK

Evi Gravitiani

Abstract


Public areas useful to meet the inner needs with recreational facilities and educational facilities. Development of public areas to provide additional public welfare or detrimental to society. The public welfare increased if the development was provide benefit larger compared by the cost to be borne, plus loss of benefit for development in the state of being old. The public welfare indicated by the magnitude of the consumer surplus acquired. Individual
travel cost method (ITCM) is used as a model that describes the number of visits and is a function of travel costs, time needed to travel, where replacement and income. The number of visits to the Taman Pintar positively and significantly influenced by the total cost of a visit to Taman Pintar, the total cost of visits to alternative places other than Taman Pintar, and visitor revenue. The correlation between the visits of the total costs a visit to Taman Pintar, the total costs a visit to place a substitute for other than Taman Pintar, and visitors income are very strong.

Keywords


public services, quality of service, institutional capacity, public area, investment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bennet, Jeff. 2008.Valuation Tools in Environmental Economics. EEPSEA Module. Thailand.

Caulkins, P.P., Richard C. Bishop dan Nicolaas W.Bouwes, Sr. 1986. The Travel Cost Model for Lake Recreation: A Comparison of Two Methods for Incorporating Site Quality and Subtitution Effect. Amer. J.Agr. Econ. Mei.

Common, M 1996. Environmental and Resources Economics, An Introduction. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Publishing.

Kling, C.L. 1988. The Reliability of Estimates of Environmental Benefit from Recreation Demand Models, Amer. J. Agr. Econ., November.

Lee, James A. 1999. Natural Resources and Environmental Economic, 2nd Edition, London: Pearson Education Limited.

Reksohadiprodjo, S. dan A.B. Purnomo. 1992. Ekonomi Lingkungan, Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM.

Saptono, Chairul Agus. 2000. Valuasi Ekonomi Area Publik: Studi Kasus Stadion Manahan di Solo, Tesis Program Pascasarjana Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, tidak dipublikasikan.

Seller, C., John R. Stoll dan Jean-Paul Chavas. 1985. Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change: A Comparison of Nonmarket

Techniques. Land Economics, 61(2).

Smith, V.K. 1988. Selection and Recreation Demand.

America Journal of Agro Economics.

Smith, V.K., William H. Desvousges dan Ann Fisher. 1986. A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Methods for Estimating Environmental Benefit. America Journal of Agro Economics, Mei.

Tientenberg, Tom. 1992. Environment and Natural Resources Economics, Third Edition, New York: Harper Collins Publisher.

Trochim, William M. 2002. The Research Methods Knowledge Base. http:// trochim.human.cornell.edu/kb/index.htm

Watson, C.J., P. Ballingsley., D.J Croft., and D.V. Hundsberger. 1993. Statistic for Management and Economics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, Inc.

World Bank. 2001.The Quality of Growth.New York: Oxford University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 JESP: Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan



 

Office:
Redaksi JESP UMY, Gedung E2 Lantai 2, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Jalan Brawijaya, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55183
Telp: (0274) 387656 ext.184
Fax: (0274) 387646
Email: jesp@umy.ac.id


Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan (JESP) is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.