KEBIJAKAN LUAR NEGERI DAN KEMAKMURAN EKONOMI
Main Article Content
Abstract
A foreign policy of a nation determined by policy capacity. The policy capacity indicators include: a) they whom related in decision making which try to develop national consensus about a goal and a way to reach the goal, focuses systematic understanding in policy making process, avoid doubtful in taking the policy; b) focuses a patience in waiting for results; c) look at other countries which are not as a unity; d) continuously increase policy capacity.
As developing country, the Indonesia‘s foreign policy was become a tool for increasing welfare. A measure of success in Indonesia‘s foreign policy have to be linked to achievements of Indonesia’s welfare during the government’s period. The president’s ability in increasing policy capacity and bargaining is vital. In other words, foreign policy by economic approach is real practice by sharpening vision continuously to get a better result.
Article Details
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Bantarto Bandoro, “Democracy and Foreign Policy: Outlook for 2005,” The Jakarta Post, 30 Desember 2004.
Davis B. Bobrow and Steve Chan, “Understanding Anomalous Successes: Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea,” dalam buku, New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, diedit oleh Charles E Herman, Charles W. Kegley Jr., JamesN. Rosenau, Boston: Allen & Unwin Inc., 1987, hal 111.
George A. Lopez and Michael S. Stohl, International Relations: Contemporary Theory and Practice, Washington D.C., Congressional Quarterly Press, 1989, hal. 5.
Hadi Soesastro, “Indonesia’s Evolving Foreign Policy and ASEAN Leadership,” USINDO Open Forum, Washington D.C., April 22, 2003.
Hans J. Morgenthau, Politik Antar Bangsa, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. 1990, hal. 41.
John Funston, “Malaysia: Developmental State Challenged,” dalam Government and Politics in Southeast Asia, John Funston (ed), Singapore: Institute of southeast Asian Studies, 2001, hal. 170
Joseph Chin Yong Liow,” Malaysia-China Relations in the 1990s: The Maturing of a Partnership,” Asian Survey (July/August 2000), hal. 674.
Jerel Rosati and Stephen Twing, “The Presidency and U.S. Foreign Policy after the Cold War,” dalam James M. Scott, Making U.S. Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War World, Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1998, hal. 38
K.J. Hoisti, “The Comparative Analysis of Foreign Policy: Some Notes on the Pitfalls and Paths to Theory,” dalam buku The Political Economy of Foreign Policy in Southeast Asia, diedit oleh David Wurfel dan Bruce Burton, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, The Macmillan Press, Ltd, 1990, hal. 13-14.
Lee H. Hamilton, “A Democract Looks At Foreign Policy,” Foreign Policy (Summer 1992), hal. 36.
Stanley B. Greenberg,”The Mythology of Centrism: Why Clinton and Blair Really Won? The American Prospect, (September 1 — October 1, 1997).
Referensi terkait:
http ://www. df at. goy. aulaib/australia_foreign_trade_policy. html
http://www.kln.gov.my/englishlforeignaffairs/foreignpolicy/myforeign.htm
Kompas, 20 Mei 2005.
The Jakarta Post, 6 Oktober 2003.
The Jakarta Post, Economic Outlook 2005.
The Jakarta Post, 23 Pebruari 2005